Galilei, Galileo Discourse concerning the natation of bodies 1663 London Thomas Salusbury en galil_natat_074_en_1663.xml 074.xml

A DISCOURSE PRESENTEDTO THE MOST SERENE Don Co&longs;imo II. GREAT DUKE OFTUSCANY, CONCERNING The NATATION of BODIES Vpon, And SUBMERSION In, THE WATER.

By GALILEUS GALILEI: Philo&longs;opher and Mathematician, unto His mo&longs;t Serene Highne&longs;&longs;e.

Engli&longs;hed from the Second Edition of the ITALIAN, compared with the Manu&longs;cript Copies, and reduced into PROPOSITIONS: By THOMAS SALUSBURY, E&longs;que

LONDON: Printed by WILLIAM LEYBOURN: M D C LXIII.

A DISCOVRSE Pre&longs;ented to the Mo&longs;t Serene DON COSIMO II. GREATDUKE of TUSC ANY:CONCERNINGThe Natation of BODIES Upon, or Submer&longs;ion In, the WATER.

Con&longs;idering (Mo&longs;t Serene Prince) that the publi&longs;hing this pre&longs;ent Treati&longs;e, of &longs;o different an Argument from that which many expect, and which according to the intentions I propo&longs;ed in my ^{*} A&longs;tronomi­call Advi&longs;o, I &longs;hould before this time have put forth, might peradventure make &longs;ome thinke, either that I had wholly relinqui&longs;hed my farther imployment about the new Cele&longs;tiall Ob&longs;ervations, or that, at lea&longs;t, I handled them very remi&longs;&longs;ely; I have judged fit to render an account, a&longs;well of my deferring that, as of my writing, and publi&longs;hing this treati&longs;e.

His Nuncio Sl­derio.

As to the fir&longs;t, the la&longs;t di&longs;coveries of Saturn to be tricorporeall, and of the mutations of Figure in Venus, like to tho&longs;e that are &longs;een in the Moon, together with the Con&longs;equents depending thereupon, have not &longs;o much occa&longs;ioned the demur, as the inve&longs;tigation of the times of the Conver&longs;ions of each of the Four Medicean Planets about Ju­ piter, which I lighted upon in April the year pa&longs;t, 1611, at my being in Rome; where, in the end, I a&longs;&longs;ertained my &longs;elfe, that the fir&longs;t and neere&longs;t to Jupiter, moved about 8 gr. & 29 m. of its Sphere in an houre, make­ ing its whole revolution in one naturall day, and 18 hours, and almo&longs;t an halfe. The &longs;econd moves in its Orbe 14 gr. 13 min. or very neer, in an hour, and its compleat conver&longs;ion is con&longs;ummate in 3 dayes, 13 hours, and one third, or thereabouts. The third pa&longs;&longs;eth in an hour, 2 gr. 6 min. little more or le&longs;s of its Circle, and mea&longs;ures it all in 7 dayes, 4 hours, or very neer. The fourth, and more remote than the re&longs;t, goes in one houre, o gr 54 min. and almo&longs;t an halfe of its Sphere, and fini&longs;heth it all in 16 dayes, and very neer 18 hours. But be­ cau&longs;e the exce&longs;&longs;ive velocity of their returns or re&longs;titutions, requires a mo&longs;t &longs;crupulous preci&longs;ene&longs;&longs;e to calculate their places, in times pa&longs;t and future, e&longs;pecially if the time be for many Moneths or Years; I am therefore forced, with other Ob&longs;ervations, and more exact than the former, and in times more remote from one another, to correct the Tables of &longs;uch Motions, and limit them even to the &longs;horte&longs;t mo­ ment: for &longs;uch exactne&longs;&longs;e my fir&longs;t Ob&longs;ervations &longs;uffice not; not only in regard of the &longs;hort intervals of Time, but becau&longs;e I had not as then found out a way to mea&longs;ure the di&longs;tances between the &longs;aid Planets by any In&longs;trument: I Ob&longs;erved &longs;uch Intervals with &longs;imple relation to the Diameter of the Body of Jupiter; taken, as we have &longs;aid, by the eye, the which, though they admit not errors of above a Minute, yet they &longs;uffice not for the determination of the exact greatne&longs;s of the Spheres of tho&longs;e Stars. But now that I have hit upon a way of ta­ king &longs;uch mea&longs;ures without failing, &longs;carce in a very few Seconds, I will continue the ob&longs;ervation to the very occultation of JVPITER, which &longs;hall &longs;erve to bring us to the perfect knowledge of the Moti­ ons, and Magnitudes of the Orbes of the &longs;aid Planets, together al&longs;o with &longs;ome other con&longs;equences thence ari&longs;ing. I adde to the&longs;e things the ob&longs;ervation of &longs;ome ob&longs;cure Spots, which are di&longs;cover­ ed in the Solar Body, which changing, po&longs;ition in that, propounds to our con&longs;ideration a great argument either that the Sun revolves in it &longs;elfe, or that perhaps other Starts, in like manner as Venus and Mercury, revolve about it, invi&longs;ible in other times, by rea&longs;on of their &longs;mall digre&longs;&longs;ions, le&longs;&longs;e than that of Mercury, and only vi&longs;ible when they interpo&longs;e between the Sun and our eye, or el&longs;e hint the truth of both this and that; the certainty of which things ought not to be contemned, nor omitted.

The Authors Ob&longs;ervations of the Solar Spots.

Continuall ob&longs;ervation hath at la&longs;t a&longs;&longs;ured me that the&longs;e Spots are matters contiguous to the Body of the Sun, there continually produced in great number, and afterwards di&longs;&longs;olved, &longs;ome in a &longs;horter, &longs;ome in a longer time, and to be by the Conver&longs;ion or Revolution of the Sun in it &longs;elfe, which in a Lunar Moneth, or thereabouts, fini&longs;heth its Period, caried about in a Circle, an accident great of it &longs;elfe, and greater for its Con&longs;equences.

The occa&longs;ion in­ ducing the Au­ thor to write this Treati&longs;e.

As to the other particular in the next place. ^{*} Many cau&longs;es have moved me to write the pre&longs;ent Tract, the &longs;ubject whereof, is the Di&longs;pute which I held &longs;ome dayes &longs;ince, with &longs;ome learned men of this City, about which, as your Highne&longs;&longs;e knows, have followed many Di&longs;cour&longs;es: The principall of which Cau&longs;es hath been the Intimation of your Highne&longs;&longs;e, having commended to me Writing, as a &longs;ingular means to make true known from fal&longs;e, reall from appa­ rent Rea&longs;ons, farr better than by Di&longs;puting vocally, where the one or the other, or very often both the Di&longs;putants, through too greate heate, or exalting of the voyce, either are not under&longs;tood, or el&longs;e being tran&longs;ported by o&longs;tentation of not yeilding to one ano­ ther, farr from the fir&longs;t Propo&longs;ition, with the novelty, of the various Propo&longs;als, confound both them&longs;elves and their Auditors.

Moreover, it &longs;eemed to me convenient to informe your High­ ne&longs;&longs;e of all the &longs;equell, concerning the Controver&longs;ie of which I treat, as it hath been adverti&longs;ed often already by others: and becau&longs;e the Doctrine which I follow, in the di&longs;cu&longs;&longs;ion of the point in hand, is different from that of Ari&longs;totle; and interferes with his Principles, I have con&longs;idered that again&longs;t the Authority of that mo&longs;t famous Man, which among&longs;t many makes all &longs;u&longs;pected that comes not from the Schooles of the Peripateticks, its farr better to give ones Rea&longs;ons by the Pen than by word of mouth and therfore I re&longs;olved to write the pre&longs;ent di&longs;cour&longs;e: in which yet I hope to demon&longs;trate that it was not out of capritiou&longs;ne&longs;&longs;e, or for that I had not read or under&longs;tood Ari&longs;totle, that I &longs;ometimes &longs;werve from his opinion, but becau&longs;e &longs;everall Rea&longs;ons per&longs;wade me to it, and the &longs;ame Ari&longs;totle hath

tought me to fix my judgment on that which is grounded upon Rea&longs;on, and not on the bare Authority of the Ma&longs;ter; and it is mo&longs;t certaine according to the &longs;entence of Alcinoos, that philo&longs;opha­ ting &longs;hould be free. Nor is the re&longs;olution of our Que&longs;tion in my judgment without &longs;ome benefit to the Univer&longs;all, fora&longs;much as treating whether the figure of Solids operates, or not, in their going, or not going to the bottome in Water, in occurrences of building Bridges or other Fabricks on the Water, which happen commonly in affairs of grand import, it may be of great availe to know the truth.

Ari&longs;totle prefers Rea&longs;on to the Authority ofan Author.

The benefit of this Argument.

I &longs;ay therfore, that being the la&longs;t Summer in company with certain Learned men, it was &longs;aid in the argumentation; That Conden&longs;ation was the propriety of Cold, and there was alledged for in&longs;tance, the example of Ice: now I at that time &longs;aid, that, in my judgment, the Ice &longs;hould be rather Water rarified than conden&longs;ed, and my rea&longs;on was, becau&longs;e Conden&longs;ation begets diminution of Ma&longs;s, and augmentation of gravity, and Rarifaction cau&longs;eth greater Lightne&longs;s, and augmentarion of Ma&longs;&longs;e: and Water in freezing, encrea&longs;eth in Ma&longs;&longs;e, and the Ice made thereby is lighter than the Water on which it &longs;wimmeth.

Conden&longs;ation the Propriety of Cold, according to the Peripate­ ticks.

Ice rather water rarified, than conden&longs;ed, and why:

What I &longs;ay, is manife&longs;t, becau&longs;e, the medium &longs;ubtracting from the whole Gravity of Sollids the weight of &longs;uch another Ma&longs;&longs;e of the &longs;aid Medium; was Archimedes proves in his ^{*} Fir&longs;t Booke De In&longs;identibus Humido; when ever the Ma&longs;&longs;e of the &longs;aid Solid encrea&longs;eth by Di&longs;traction, the more &longs;hall the Medium detract from its entire Gravity; and le&longs;&longs;e, when by Compre&longs;&longs;ion it &longs;hall be conden&longs;ed and reduced to a le&longs;&longs;e Ma&longs;&longs;e.

In lib: 1. of Na­ tation of Bodies Prop. 7.

Figure operates not in the Nata­ tion of Sollids.

It was an&longs;wered me, that that proceeded not from the greater Levity; but from the Figure, large and flat, which not being able to pene­ trate the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Water, is the cau&longs;e that it &longs;ubmergeth not. I replied, that any piece of Ice, of what&longs;oever Figure, &longs;wims upon the Water, a manife&longs;t &longs;igne, that its being never &longs;o flat and broad, hath not any part in its floating: and added, that it was a manife&longs;t proofe hereof to &longs;ee a piece of Ice of very broad Figure being thru&longs;t to the botome of the Water, &longs;uddenly return to flote atoppe, which had it been more grave, and had its &longs;wimming proceeded from its Forme, unable to penetrate the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Medium, that would be altogether impo&longs;&longs;ible; I concluded therefore, that the Figure was in &longs;ort a Cau&longs;e of the Natation or Submer&longs;ion of Bodies, but the greater or le&longs;&longs;e Gravity in re&longs;pect of the Water: and there­ fore all Bodyes heavier than it of what Figure &longs;oever they be, indiffe­ rently go to the bottome, and the lighter, though of any figure, float indifferently on the top: and I &longs;uppo&longs;e that tho&longs;e which hold other­ wi&longs;e, were induced to that beliefe, by &longs;eeing how that diver&longs;ity of Formes or Figures, greatly altereth the Velo&longs;ity, and Tardity of Motion; &longs;o that Bodies of Figure broad and thin, de&longs;cend far more lea&longs;urely into the Water, than tho&longs;e of a more compacted Figure, though both made of the &longs;ame Matter: by which &longs;ome might be induced to believe that the Dilatation of the Figure might reduce it to &longs;uch amplene&longs;&longs;e that it &longs;hould not only retard but wholly impede and take away the Motion, which I hold to be fal&longs;e. Upon this Conclu&longs;ion, in many dayes di&longs;cour&longs;e, was &longs;poken much, and many things, and divers Experiments produced, of which your Highne&longs;&longs;e heard, and &longs;aw &longs;ome, and in this di&longs;cour&longs;e &longs;hall have all that which hath been produced again&longs;t my A&longs;&longs;ertion, and what hath been &longs;ugge&longs;ted to my thoughts on this matter, and for con­ firmation of my Conclu&longs;ion: which if it &longs;hall &longs;uffice to remove that (as I e&longs;teem hitherto fal&longs;e) Opinion, I &longs;hall thinke I have not unprofitably &longs;pent my paynes and time. and although that come not to pa&longs;&longs;e, yet ought I to promi&longs;e another benefit to my &longs;elfe, namely, of attaining the knowledge of the truth, by hearing my Fallacyes confuted, and true demon&longs;trations produced by tho&longs;e of the contrary opinion.

And to proceed with the greate&longs;t plainne&longs;s and per&longs;picuity that I can po&longs;&longs;ible, it is, I conceive, nece&longs;&longs;ary, fir&longs;t of all to declare what is the true, intrin&longs;ecall, and totall Cau&longs;e, of the a&longs;cending of &longs;ome Sollid Bodyes in the Water, and therein floating; or on the contrary, of their &longs;inking. and &longs;o much the rather in a&longs;much as I cannot &longs;atisfie my &longs;elfe in that which Ari&longs;totle hath left written on this Subject.

The cau&longs;e of the Natation & &longs;ub­

I &longs;ay then the Cau&longs;e why &longs;ome Sollid Bodyes de&longs;cend to the Bottom of Water, is the exce&longs;&longs;e of their Gravity, above the Gravity of the Water; and on the contrary, the exce&longs;s of the Waters Gravity above the Gravity of tho&longs;e, is the Cau&longs;e that others do not de&longs;cend, rather that they ri&longs;e from the Bottom, and a&longs;cend to the Surface. This was &longs;ubtilly demon&longs;trated by Archimedes in his Book Of the NATATION of BODIES: Conferred afterwards by a very grave Author, but, if I erre not invi&longs;ibly, as below for defence of him, I &longs;hall endeavour to prove.

mer&longs;ion of Sol­ ids in the Wa­ ter.

I, with a different Method, and by other meanes, will endeavour to demon&longs;trate the &longs;ame, reducing the Cau&longs;es of &longs;uch Effects to more intrin&longs;ecall and immediate Principles, in which al&longs;o are di&longs;co­ vered the Cau&longs;es of &longs;ome admirable and almo&longs;t incredible Acci­ dents, as that would be, that a very little quantity of Water, &longs;hould be able, with its &longs;mall weight, to rai&longs;e and &longs;u&longs;tain a Solid Body, an hundred or a thou&longs;and times heavier than it.

And becau&longs;e demon&longs;trative Order &longs;o requires, I &longs;hall define cer­ tain Termes, and afterwards explain &longs;ome Propo&longs;itions, of which, as of things true and obvious, I may make u&longs;e of to my pre&longs;ent pur­ po&longs;e.

DEFINITION I.

I then call equally Grave in &longs;pecie, tho&longs;e Matters of which equall Ma&longs;&longs;es weigh equally.

As if for example, two Balls, one of Wax, and the other of &longs;ome Wood of equall Ma&longs;&longs;e, were al&longs;o equall in Weight, we &longs;ay, that &longs;uch Wood, and the Wax are in &longs;pecie equally grave.

DEFINITION II.

But equally grave in Ab&longs;olute Gravity, we call two Sollids, weighing equally, though of Ma&longs;s they be unequall.

As for example, a Ma&longs;s of Lead, and another of Wood, that weigh each ten pounds, I call equall in Ab&longs;olute Gravity, though the Ma&longs;s of the Wood be much greater then that of the Lead.

And, con&longs;equently, le&longs;s Grave in &longs;pecie.

DEFINITION III.

I call a Matter more Grave in &longs;pecie than another, of which a Ma&longs;s, equall to a Ma&longs;s of the other, &longs;hall weigh more.

And &longs;o I &longs;ay, that Lead is more grave in &longs;pecie than Tinn, becau&longs;e if you take of them two equall Ma&longs;&longs;es, that of the Lead weigheth more.

DEFINITION IV.

But I call that Body more grave ab&longs;olutely than this, if that weigh more than this, without any re&longs;pect had to the Ma&longs;&longs;es.

And thus a great piece of Wood is &longs;aid to weigh more than a little lump of Lead, though the Lead be in &longs;pecie more heavy than the Wood. And the &longs;ame is to be under&longs;tood of the le&longs;s grave in &longs;pecie, and the le&longs;s grave ab&longs;olutely.

The&longs;e Termes defined, I take from the Mechanicks two Princi­ ples: the fir&longs;t is, that

AXIOME. I.

Weights ab&longs;olutely equall, moved with equall Velocity, are of equall Force and Moment in their operations.

DEFINITION V.

Moment, among&longs;t Mechanicians, &longs;igrifieth that Vertue, that Force, or that Efficacy, with which the Mover moves, and the Moveable re&longs;i&longs;ts.

Which Vertue dependes not only on the &longs;imple Gravity, but on the Velocity of the Motion, and on the diver&longs;e Inclinations of the Spaces along which the Motion is made: For a de&longs;cending Weight makes a greater Impetus in a Space much declining, than in one le&longs;s declining; and in &longs;umme, what ever is the occa&longs;ion of &longs;uch Vertue, it ever retaines the name of Moment; nor in my Judgement, is this &longs;ence new in our Idiome, for, if I mistake not, I think we often &longs;ay; This is a weighty bu&longs;ine&longs;&longs;e, but the other is of &longs;mall moment: and we con&longs;ider lighter mat­ ters and let pa&longs;s tho&longs;e of Moment; a Metaphor, I &longs;uppo&longs;e, taken from the Mechanicks.

As for example, two weights equall in ab&longs;olute Gravity, being put into a Ballance of equall Arms, they &longs;tand in Equilibrium, nei­ ther one going down, nor the other up: becau&longs;e the equality of the Di&longs;tances of both, from the Centre on which the Ballance is &longs;uppor­ ted, and about which it moves, cau&longs;eth that tho&longs;e weights, the &longs;aid Ballance moving, &longs;hall in the &longs;ame Time move equall Spaces, that is, &longs;hall move with equall Velocity, &longs;o that there is no rea&longs;on for which this Weight &longs;hould de&longs;cend more than that, or that more than this; and therefore they make an Equilibrium, and their Moments continue of &longs;emblable and equall Vertue.

The &longs;econd Principle is; That

AXIOME II.

The Moment and Force of the Gravity, is encrea&longs;ed by the Velocity of the Motion.

So that Weights ab&longs;olutely equall, but conjoyned with Velocity unequall, are of Force, Moment and Vertue unequall: and the more potent, the more &longs;wift, according to the proportion of the Ve­ locity of the one, to the Velocity of the other. Of this we have a very pertinent example in the Balance or Stiliard of unequall Arms, at which Weights ab&longs;olutely equall being &longs;u&longs;pended, they do not weigh down, and gravitate equally, but that which is at a greater di&longs;tance from the Centre, about which the Beam moves, de&longs;cends, rai&longs;ing the other, and the Motion of this which a&longs;cends is &longs;low, and the other &longs;wift: and &longs;uch is the Force and Vertue, which from the Velocity of the Mover, is conferred on the Moveable, which receives it, that it can exqui&longs;itely compen&longs;ate, as much more Weight added to the other &longs;lower Moveable: &longs;o that if of the Arms of the Balance, one were ten times as long as the other, whereupon in the Beames moving about the Centre, the end of that would go ten times as far as the end of this, a Weight &longs;u&longs;pended at the greater di&longs;tance, may &longs;u&longs;tain and poy&longs;e another ten times more grave ab&longs;olutely than it: and that becau&longs;e the Stiliard moving, the le&longs;&longs;er Weight &longs;hall move ten times fa&longs;ter than the bigger. It ought alwayes therefore to be under&longs;tood, that Motions are according to the &longs;ame Inclinations, namely, that if one of the Moveables move perpendicularly to the Horizon, then the other makes its Motion by the like Perpendicular; and if the Motion of one were to be made Horizontally; that then the other is made along the &longs;ame Horizontall plain: and in &longs;umme, alwayes both in like Inclinations. This proportion between the Gravity and Velocity is found in all Mechanicall In&longs;truments: and is con&longs;idered by Ari&longs;totle, as a Principle in his Mechanicall Que&longs;tions; whereupon we al&longs;o may take it for a true A&longs;&longs;umption, That

AXIOME III.

Weights ab&longs;olutely unequall, do alternately counterpoy&longs;e and become of equall Moments, as oft as their Gravi­ ties, with contrary proportion, an&longs;wer to the Velocity of their Motions.

That is to &longs;ay, that by how much the one is le&longs;s grave than the other, by &longs;o much is it in a con&longs;titution of moving more &longs;wiftly than that.

Having prefatically explicated the&longs;e things, we may begin to en­ quire, what Bodyes tho&longs;e are which totally &longs;ubmerge in Water, and go to the Bottom, and which tho&longs;e that by con&longs;traint float on the top, &longs;o that being thru&longs;t by violence under Water, they return to &longs;wim, with one part of their Ma&longs;s vi&longs;ible above the Surface of the Water: and this we will do by con&longs;idering the re&longs;pective operati­ on of the &longs;aid Solids, and of Water: Which operation followes the Submer&longs;ion and &longs;inking; and this it is, That in the Submer&longs;ion that the Solid maketh, being depre&longs;&longs;ed downwards by its proper Gravity, it comes to drive away the water from the place where it &longs;ucce&longs;&longs;ively &longs;ubenters, and the water repul&longs;ed ri&longs;eth and a&longs;cends above its fir&longs;t levell, to which A&longs;cent on the other &longs;ide it, as being a grave Body of its own nature, re&longs;i&longs;ts: And becau&longs;e the de&longs;cending Solid more and more immerging, greater and greater quantity of Water a&longs;cends, till the whole Sollid be &longs;ubmerged; its nece&longs;&longs;ary to compare the Moments of the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the water to A&longs;cen&longs;ion, with the Moments of the pre&longs;&longs;ive Gravity of the Solid: And if the Moments of the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the water, &longs;hall equalize the Moments of the Solid, before its totall Immer&longs;ion; in this ca&longs;e doubtle&longs;s there &longs;hall be made an Equilibrium, nor &longs;hall the Body &longs;ink any farther. But if the Moment of the Solid, &longs;hall alwayes exceed the Moments wherewith the repul&longs;ed water &longs;ucce&longs;&longs;ively makes Re&longs;i&longs;tance, that Solid &longs;hall not only wholly &longs;ubmerge under water, but &longs;hall de&longs;cend to the Bottom. But if, la&longs;tly, in the in&longs;tant of totall Submer&longs;ion, the equality &longs;hall be made between the Moments of the prement Solid, and the re&longs;i&longs;ting Water; then &longs;hall re&longs;t en&longs;ue, and the &longs;aid Solid &longs;hall be able to re&longs;t indifferently, in what&longs;oever part of the water. By this time is manife&longs;t the nece&longs;&longs;ity of comparing the Gravity of the water, and of the Solid; and this compari&longs;on might at fir&longs;t &longs;ight &longs;eem &longs;ufficient to conclude and determine which are the Solids that float a-top, and which tho&longs;e that &longs;ink to the Bottom in the water, a&longs;&longs;erting that tho&longs;e &longs;hall float which are le&longs;&longs;e grave in &longs;pecie than the water, and tho&longs;e &longs;ubmerge, which are in &longs;pecie more grave. For it &longs;eems in appearance, that the Sollid in &longs;inking continually, rai&longs;eth &longs;o much Water in Ma&longs;s, as an&longs;wers to the parts of its own Bulk &longs;ubmerged: whereupon it is impo&longs;&longs;ible, that a Solid le&longs;s grave in &longs;pecie, than water, &longs;hould wholly &longs;ink, as being unable to rai&longs;e a weight greater than its own, and &longs;uch would a Ma&longs;s of water equall to its own Ma&longs;s be. And likewi&longs;e it &longs;eems nece&longs;&longs;ary, that the graver Solids do go to the Bottom, as being of a Force more than &longs;ufficient for the rai&longs;ing a Ma&longs;&longs;e of water, equall to its own, though inferiour in weight. Neverthele&longs;s the bu&longs;ine&longs;s &longs;ucceeds otherwi&longs;e: and though the Conclu&longs;ions are true, yet are the Cau&longs;es thus a&longs;&longs;igned deficient, nor is it true, that the Solid in &longs;ubmerging, rai&longs;eth and repul&longs;eth Ma&longs;&longs;es of Water, equall to the parts of it &longs;elf &longs;ubmerged; but the Water repul&longs;ed, is alwayes le&longs;s than the parts of the Solid &longs;ubmerged: and &longs;o much the more by how much the Ve&longs;&longs;ell in which the Water is contained is narrower: in &longs;uch manner that it hinders not, but that a Solid may &longs;ubmerge all under Water, with­ out rai&longs;ing &longs;o much Water in Ma&longs;s, as would equall the tenth or twentieth part of its own Bulk: like as on the contrary, a very &longs;mall quantity of Water, may rai&longs;e a very great Solid Ma&longs;s, though &longs;uch Solid &longs;hould weigh ab&longs;olutely a hundred times as much, or more, than the &longs;aid Water, if &longs;o be that the Matter of that &longs;ame Solid be in &longs;pecie le&longs;s grave than the Water. And thus a great Beam, as &longs;uppo&longs;e of a 1000 weight, may be rai&longs;ed and born afloat by Water, which weighs not 50: and this happens when the Mo­ ment of the Water is compen&longs;ated by the Velocity of its Motion.

How the &longs;ub­ mer&longs;ion of So­ lids in the Wa­ ter, is effected.

What Solids &longs;hall float on the Water.

What Solids &longs;hall &longs;inke to the botome.

What Solids &longs;hall re&longs;t in all places of the Wa­ ter.

The Gravitie of the Water and Solid mu&longs;t be compared in all Problems, of Na­ tation of Bodies.

The water re­ pul&longs;ed is ever le&longs;s than the parts of the Sollid &longs;ub­ merged.

A &longs;mall quantity of water, may float a very great Solid Ma&longs;s.

But becau&longs;e &longs;uch things, propounded thus in ab&longs;tract, are &longs;ome­ what difficult to be comprehended, it would be good to demon&longs;trate them by particular examples; and for facility of demon&longs;tration, we will &longs;uppo&longs;e the Ve&longs;&longs;els in which we are to put the Water, and place the Solids, to be inviron'd and included with &longs;ides erected perpendi­ cular to the Plane of the Horizon, and the Solid that is to be put into &longs;uch ve&longs;&longs;ell to be either a &longs;treight Cylinder, or el&longs;e an upright Pri&longs;me

The which propo&longs;ed and declared, I proceed to demonstrate the truth of what hath been hinted, forming the en&longs;uing Theoreme.

THEOREME I.

The Ma&longs;s of the Water whicha&longs;cends in the &longs;ub­ merging of a Solid, Pri&longs;me or Cylinder, or that aba&longs;eth in taking it out, is le&longs;s than the Ma&longs;s of the &longs;aid Solid, &longs;o depre&longs;&longs;ed or advanced: and hath to it the &longs;ame proportion, that the Surface of the Water circumfu&longs;ing the Solid, hath to the &longs;ame circumfu&longs;ed Surface, together with the Ba&longs;e of the Solid.

The Proportion of the water rai­ &longs;ed to the Solid &longs;ubmerged.

Let the Ve&longs;&longs;ell be A B C D, and in it the Water rai&longs;ed up to the Levell E F G, before the Solid Pri&longs;me H I K be therein immerged; but after that it is depre&longs;&longs;ed under Water, let the Water be rai&longs;ed as high as the Levell L M, the Solid H I K &longs;hall then be all under Water, and the Ma&longs;s of the elevated Water &longs;hall be L G, which is le&longs;s than the

Ma&longs;&longs;e of the Solid depre&longs;&longs;ed, namely of H I K, being equall to the only part E I K, which is contained under the fir&longs;t Levell E F G. Which is manife&longs;t, becau&longs;e if the Solid H I K be taken out, the Water I G &longs;hall return into the place occupied by the Ma&longs;s E I K, where it was continuate be­ fore the &longs;ubmer&longs;ion of the Pri&longs;me. And the Ma&longs;s L G being equall to the Ma&longs;s E K: adde thereto the Ma&longs;s E N, and it &longs;hall be the whole Ma&longs;s E M, compo&longs;ed of the parts of the Pri&longs;me E N, and of the Water N F, equall to the whole Solid H I K: And, there­ fore, the Ma&longs;s L G &longs;hall have the &longs;ame proportion to E M, as to the Ma&longs;s H I K: But the Ma&longs;s L G hath the &longs;ame proportion to the Ma&longs;s E M, as the Surface L M hath to the Surface M H: Therefore it is ma­ nife&longs;t, that the Ma&longs;s of Water repul&longs;ed L G, is in proportion to the Ma&longs;s of the Solid &longs;ubmerged H I K; as the Surface L M, namely, that of the Water ambient about the Sollid, to the whole Surface H M, compounded of the &longs;aid ambient water, and the Ba&longs;e of the Pri&longs;me H N. But if we &longs;uppo&longs;e the fir&longs;t Levell of the Water the according to the Surface H M, and the Pri&longs;me allready &longs;ubmerged H I K; and after to be taken out and rai&longs;ed to E A O, and the Water to be faln from the fir&longs;t Levell H L M as low as E F G; It is manife&longs;t, that the Pri&longs;me E A O being the &longs;ame with H I K, its &longs;uperiour part H O, &longs;hall be equall to the inferiour E I K: and remove the common part E N, and, con&longs;equently, the Ma&longs;s of the Water L G is equall to the Ma&longs;s H O; and, therefore, le&longs;s than the Solid, which is without the Water, namely, the whole Pri&longs;me E A O, to which likewi&longs;e, the &longs;aid Ma&longs;s of Water abated L G, hath the &longs;ame propor­ tion, that the Surface of the Waters circumfu&longs;ed L M hath to the &longs;ame circumfu&longs;ed Surface, together with the Ba&longs;e of the Pri&longs;me A O: which hath the &longs;ame demon&longs;tration with the former ca&longs;e above.

And from hence is inferred, that the Ma&longs;s of the Water, that ri&longs;eth in the immer&longs;ion of the Solid, or that ebbeth in elevating it, is not equall to all the Ma&longs;s of the Solid, which is &longs;ubmerged or elevated, but to that part only, which in the immer&longs;ion is under the fir&longs;t Levell of the Water, and in the elevation remaines above the fir&longs;t Levell: Which is that which was to be demon&longs;trated. We will now pur&longs;ue the things that remain.

And fir&longs;t we will demon&longs;trate that,

THEOREME II.

When in one of the above &longs;aid Ve&longs;&longs;els, of what ever breadth, whether wide or narrow, there is placed &longs;uch a Pri&longs;me or Cylinder, inviron'd with Water, if we ele­ vate that Solid perpendicularly, the Water circumfu­ &longs;ed &longs;hall abate, and the Abatement of the Water, &longs;hall have the &longs;ame proportion to the Elevation of the Pri&longs;me, as one of the Ba&longs;es of the Pri&longs;me, hath to the Surface of the Water Circumfu&longs;ed.

The proportion of the water aba­ ted, to the Solid rai&longs;ed.

Imagine in the Ve&longs;&longs;ell, as is afore&longs;aid, the

Pri&longs;me A C D B to be placed, and in the re&longs;t of the Space the Water to be dif­ fu&longs;ed as far as the Levell E A: and rai­ &longs;ing the Solid, let it be transferred to G M, and let the Water be aba&longs;ed from E A to N O: I &longs;ay, that the de&longs;cent of the Water, mea&longs;ured by the Line A O, hath the &longs;ame proportion to the ri&longs;e of the Pri&longs;me, mea&longs;ured by the Line G A, as the Ba&longs;e of the Solid G H hath to the Surface of the Water N O. The which is manife&longs;t: becau&longs;e the Ma&longs;s of the Solid G A B H, rai&longs;ed above the fir&longs;t Levell E A B, is equall to the Ma&longs;s of Water that is aba&longs;ed E N O A. Therefore, E N O A and G A B H are two equall Pri&longs;mes; for of equall Pri&longs;mes, the Ba&longs;es an&longs;wer contrarily to their heights: There­ fore, as the Altitude A O is to the Altitude A G, &longs;o is the Superfi­ cies or Ba&longs;e G H to the Surface of the Water N O. If therefore, for example, a Pillar were erected in a wa&longs;te Pond full of Water, or el&longs;e in a Well, capable of little more then the Ma&longs;s of the &longs;aid Pillar, in elevating the &longs;aid Pillar, and taking it out of the Water, according as it ri&longs;eth, the Water that invirons it will gradually abate, and the aba&longs;ement of the Water at the in&longs;tant of lifting out the Pillar, &longs;hall have the &longs;ame proportion, that the thickne&longs;s of the Pillar hath to the exce&longs;s of the breadth of the &longs;aid Pond or Well, above the thickne&longs;s of the &longs;aid Pillar: &longs;o that if the breadth of the Well were an eighth part larger than the thickne&longs;s of the Pillar, and the breadth of the Pond twenty five times as great as the &longs;aid thickne&longs;s, in the Pillars a&longs;cending one foot, the water in the Well &longs;hall de&longs;cend &longs;even foot, and that in the Pond only 1/25 of a foot.

Why a Solid le&longs;s grave in &longs;pe­ cie than water, &longs;tayeth not un­ der water, in ve­ ry &longs;mall depthst.

This Demon&longs;trated, it will not be difficult to &longs;hew the true cau&longs;e, how it comes to pa&longs;s, that,

THEOREME III.

A Pri&longs;me or regular Cylinder, of a &longs;ub&longs;tance &longs;pecifically le&longs;s grave than Water, if it &longs;hould be totally &longs;ubmerged in Water, &longs;tayes not underneath, but ri&longs;eth, though the Water circumfu&longs;ed be very little, and in ab&longs;olute Gravity, never &longs;o much inferiour to the Gravity of the &longs;aid Pri&longs;me.

Let then the Pri&longs;me A E F B, be put into the Ve&longs;&longs;ell C D F B, the &longs;ame being le&longs;s grave in &longs;pecie than the Water: and let the Water infu&longs;ed ri&longs;e to the height of the Pri&longs;me: I &longs;ay, that the Pri&longs;me left at liberty, it &longs;hall ri&longs;e, being born up by the Water circumfu&longs;ed C D E A. For the

Water C E being &longs;pecifically more grave than the Solid A F, the ab&longs;olute weight of the water C E, &longs;hall have greater proportion to the ab&longs;o­ lute weight of the Pri&longs;me A F, than the Ma&longs;s C E hath to the Ma&longs;s A F (in regard the Ma&longs;s hath the &longs;ame proportion to the Ma&longs;s, that the weight ab&longs;olute hath to the weight ab&longs;olute, in ca&longs;e the Ma&longs;&longs;es are of the &longs;ame Gravity in &longs;pecie.) But the Ma&longs;s C E is to the Ma&longs;s A F, as the Surface of the water A C, is to the Superficies, or Ba&longs;e of the Pri&longs;me A B; which is the &longs;ame pro­ portion as the a&longs;cent of the Pri&longs;me when it ri&longs;eth, hath to the de&longs;cent of the water circumfu&longs;ed C E.

Therefore, the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the water C E, hath greater proportion to the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the Pri&longs;me A F; than the A&longs;cent of the Pri&longs;me A F, hath to the de&longs;cent of the &longs;aid water C E. The Moment, therefore, compounded of the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the water C E, and of the Velocity of its de&longs;cent, whil&longs;t it forceably repul&longs;eth and rai&longs;eth the Solid A F, is greater than the Moment compounded of the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the Pri&longs;me A F, and of the Tardity of its a&longs;cent, with which Moment it contra&longs;ts and re­ fi&longs;ts the repul&longs;e and violence done it by the Moment of the water: Therefore, the Pri&longs;me &longs;hall be rai&longs;ed.

The Proportion according to which the Sub­ mer&longs;ion & Na tation of Solids is made.

It followes, now, that we proceed forward to demon&longs;trate more particularly, how much &longs;uch Solids &longs;hall be inferiour in Gravity to the water elevated; namely, what part of them &longs;hall re&longs;t &longs;ubmerged, and what &longs;hall be vi&longs;ible above the Surface of the water: but fir&longs;t it is nece&longs;&longs;ary to demon&longs;trate the &longs;ub&longs;equent Lemma.

LEMMA I.

The ab&longs;olute Gravities of Solids, have a proportion com-

pounded of the proportions of their &longs;pecificall Gravities, and of their Ma&longs;&longs;es.

The ab&longs;olute Gravity of So­ lids, are in a pro­ portion com­ pounded of their Specifick Gravi­ ties, and of their Ma&longs;&longs;es.

Let A and B be two Solids. I &longs;ay, that the Ab&longs;olute Gravity of A, hath to the Ab&longs;olute Gravity of B, a proportion com­ pounded of the proportions of the &longs;pecificall Gravity of A, to the Specificall Gravity of B, and of the Ma&longs;s A to the Ma&longs;s B. Let the Line D have the

&longs;ame proportion to E, that the &longs;pecifick Gravity of A, hath to the &longs;pecifick Gravity of B; and let E be to F, as the Ma&longs;s A to the Ma&longs;s B: It is manife&longs;t, that the proportion of D to F, is compounded of the proportions D and E; and E and F. It is requi&longs;ite, therefore, to demon&longs;trate, that as D is to F, &longs;o the ab&longs;olute Gravity of A, is to the ab&longs;olute Gravity of B. Take the Solid C, equall in Ma&longs;s to the Solid A, and of the &longs;ame Gravity in &longs;pecie with the Solid B. Becau&longs;e, therefore, A and C are equall in Ma&longs;s, the ab&longs;olute Gravity of A, &longs;hall have to the ab&longs;olute Gravity of C, the &longs;ame pro­ portion, as the &longs;pecificall Gravity of A, hath to the &longs;pecificall Gravity of C, or of B, which is the &longs;ame in &longs;pecie; that is, as D is to E. And, be­ cau&longs;e, C and B are of the &longs;ame Gravity in &longs;pecie, it &longs;hall be, that as the ab&longs;olute weight of C, is to the ab&longs;olute weight of B, &longs;o the Ma&longs;s C, or the Ma&longs;s A, is to the Ma&longs;s B; that is, as the Line E to the Line F. As therefore, the ab&longs;olute Gravity of A, is to the ab&longs;olute Gravity of C, &longs;o is the Line D to the Line E: and, as the ab&longs;olute Gravity of C, is to the ab&longs;olute Gravity of B, &longs;o is the Line E to the Line F: Therefore, by Equality of proportion, the ab&longs;olute Gra­ vity of A, is to the ab&longs;olute Gravity of B, as the Line D to the Line F: which was to be demon&longs;trated. I proceed now to demon­ &longs;trate, how that,

THEOREME IV.

The proportion of water requi­ &longs;ite to make a Solid &longs;wim.

If a Solid, Cylinder, or Pri&longs;me, le&longs;&longs;e grave &longs;pecifically than the Water, being put into a Ve&longs;&longs;el, as above, of what&longs;oever greatne&longs;&longs;e, and the Water, be afterwards infu&longs;ed, the Solid &longs;hall re&longs;t in the bottom, unrai&longs;ed, till the Water arrive to that part of the Altitude, of the &longs;aid Pri&longs;me, to which its whole Altitude hath the &longs;ame proportion, that the Specificall Gravity of the Water, hath to the Specificall Gravity of the &longs;aid Solid: but infu&longs;ing more Water, the Solid &longs;hall a&longs;cend.

Let the Ve&longs;&longs;ell be M L G N of any bigne&longs;s, and let there be pla­ ced in it the Solid Pri&longs;me D F G E, le&longs;s grave in &longs;pecie than the water; and look what proportion the Specificall Gravity of the water, hath to that of the Pri&longs;me, &longs;uch let the Altitude D F, have to the Altitude F B. I &longs;ay, that infu&longs;ing water to the Altitude F B, the Solid D G &longs;hall not float, but &longs;hall &longs;tand in Equilibrium, &longs;o, that that every little quantity of water, that is infu&longs;ed, &longs;hall rai&longs;e it. Let the water, therefore, be infu&longs;ed to the Levell A B C, and, becau&longs;e the Specifick Gravity of the Solid D G, is to the Specifick Gravity of the water, as the altitude B F is to the altitude F D; that is, as the Ma&longs;s B G to the Ma&longs;s G D; as the proportion of the Ma&longs;s B G is to the Ma&longs;s G D, as the proportion of the Ma&longs;s G D is to the Ma&longs;s A F, they compo&longs;e the Proportion of the Ma&longs;s B G to the Ma&longs;s A F. Therefore, the Ma&longs;s B G is to the Ma&longs;s A F, in a proportion compounded of the proportions of the Specifick Gravity of the Solid G D, to the Speci­ fick Gravity of the water, and of the Ma&longs;s G D to the Ma&longs;s A F: But the &longs;ame proportions

of the Specifick Gravity of G D, to the Specifick Gravity of the water, and of the Ma&longs;s G D to the Ma&longs;s A F, do al&longs;o by the precedent Lemma, compound the proportion of the ab&longs;olute Gra­ vity of the Solid D G, to the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the Ma&longs;s of the water A F: Therefore, as the Ma&longs;s B G is to the Ma&longs;s A F, &longs;o is the Ab&longs;olute Gravity of the Solid D G, to the Ab­ &longs;olute Gravity of the Ma&longs;s of the water A F. But as the Ma&longs;s B G is to the Ma&longs;s A F; &longs;o is the Ba&longs;e of the Pri&longs;me D E, to the Surface of the water AB; and &longs;o is the de&longs;cent of the water A B, to the Elevation of the Pri&longs;me D G; Therefore, the de&longs;cent of the water is to the elevation of the Pri&longs;me, as the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the Pri&longs;me, is to the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the water: Therefore, the Moment re&longs;ulting from the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the water A F, and the Velocity of the Motion of declination, with which Moment it forceth the Pri&longs;me D G, to ri&longs;e and a&longs;cend, is equall to the Moment that re&longs;ults from the ab&longs;olute Gravity of the Pri&longs;me D G, and from the Velocity of the Motion, wherewith being rai&longs;ed, it would a&longs;cend: with which Moment it re&longs;i&longs;ts its being rai&longs;ed: becau&longs;e, therefore, &longs;uch Moments are equall, there &longs;hall be an Equilibrium between the water and the Solid. And, it is manife&longs;t, that putting a little more water unto the other A F, it will increa&longs;e the Gravity and Moment, whereupon the Pri&longs;me D G, &longs;hall be overcome, and elevated till that the only part B F remaines &longs;ubmerged. Which is that that was to be demon&longs;trated.

COROLLARY I.

By what hath been demon&longs;trated, it is manife&longs;t, that Solids le&longs;s grave

in &longs;pecie than the water, &longs;ubmerge only &longs;o far, that as much water in Ma&longs;s, as is the part of the Solid &longs;ubmerged, doth weigh ab&longs;olutely as much as the whole Solid.

How far Solids le&longs;s grave in &longs;pe­ cie than water, do &longs;ubmerge.

For, it being &longs;uppo&longs;ed, that the Specificall Gravity of the water, is to the Specificall Gravity of the Pri&longs;me D G, as the Altitude D F, is to the Altitude F B; that is, as the Solid D G is to the Solid B G; we might ea&longs;ily demon&longs;trate, that as much water in Ma&longs;s as is equall to the Solid B G, doth weigh ab&longs;olutely as much as the whole Solid D G; For, by the Lemma foregoing, the Ab&longs;olute Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water, equall to the Ma&longs;s B G, hath to the Ab­ &longs;olute Gravity of the Pri&longs;me D G, a proportion compounded of the proportions, of the Ma&longs;s B G to the Ma&longs;s G D, and of the Specifick Gravit 7 of the water, to the Specifick Gravity of the Pri&longs;me: But the Gravity in &longs;pecie of the water, to the Gravity in &longs;pecie of the Pri&longs;me, is &longs;uppo&longs;ed to be as the Ma&longs;s G D to the Ma&longs;s G B. There­ fore, the Ab&longs;olute Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water, equall to the Ma&longs;s B G, is to the Ab&longs;olute Gravity of the Solid D G, in a proportion compounded of the proportions, of the Ma&longs;s B G to the Ma&longs;s G D, and of the Ma&longs;s D G to the Ma&longs;s G B; which is a proportion of equalitie. The Ab&longs;olute Gravity, therefore, of a Ma&longs;s of Water equall to the part of the Ma&longs;s of the Pri&longs;me B G, is equall to the Ab­ &longs;olute Gravity of the whole Solid D G.

COROLLARY II.

A Rule to equi­ librate Solids in the water.

It followes, moreover, that a Solid le&longs;s grave than the water, being put into a Ve&longs;&longs;ell of any imaginable greatne&longs;s, and water being circumfu&longs;ed about it to &longs;uch a height, that as much water in Ma&longs;s, as is the part of the Solid &longs;ubmerged, doth/> weigh ab&longs;olutely as much as the whole Solid; it &longs;hall by that water be ju&longs;tly &longs;u&longs;tained, be the circumfu&longs;ed Water in quantity greater or le&longs;&longs;er.

For, if the Cylinder or Pri&longs;me M, le&longs;s grave than the water, v. gra. in Sub&longs;equiteriall proportion, &longs;hall be put into the capaci­ ous Ve&longs;&longs;ell A B C D, and the water rai&longs;ed about it, to three quarters of its height, namely, to its Levell A D: it &longs;hall be &longs;u&longs;tained and exactly poy&longs;ed in Equi­ librium. The &longs;ame will hap­ pen, if the Ve&longs;&longs;ell E N S F

were very &longs;mall, &longs;o, that be­ tween the Ve&longs;&longs;ell and the So­ lid M, there were but a very narrow &longs;pace, and only capable of &longs;o much water, as the hundredth part of the Ma&longs;s M, by which it &longs;hould be likewi&longs;e rai&longs;ed and erected, as before it had been elevated to three fourths of the height of the Solid: which to many at the fir&longs;t &longs;ight, may &longs;eem a notable Paradox, and beget a conceit, that the Demon&longs;tration of the&longs;e effects, were &longs;ophi&longs;ticall and fallacious: but, for tho&longs;e who &longs;o repute it, the Ex­ periment is a means that may fully &longs;atisfie them. But he that &longs;hall but comprehend of what Importance Velocity of Motion is, and how it exactly compen&longs;ates the defect and want of Gravity, will cea&longs;e to wonder, in con&longs;idering that at the elevation of the Solid M, the great Ma&longs;s of water A B C D abateth very little, but the little Ma&longs;s of water E N S F decrea&longs;eth very much, and in an in&longs;tant, as the Solid M before did li&longs;e, howbeit for a very &longs;hort &longs;pace: Whereupon the Moment, compounded of the &longs;mall Ab&longs;olute Gravity of the water E N S F, and of its great Velocity in ebbing, equalizeth the Force and and Moment, that re&longs;ults from the compo&longs;icion of the immen&longs;e Gra­ vity of the water A B C D, with its great &longs;lowne&longs;&longs;e of ebbing; &longs;ince that in the Elevation of the Sollid M, the aba&longs;ement of the le&longs;­

&longs;er water E S, is performed ju&longs;t &longs;o much more &longs;wiftly than the great Ma&longs;s of water A C, as this is more in Ma&longs;s than that which we thus demon&longs;trate.

The proportion according to which water ri­ &longs;eth and falls in different Ve&longs;&longs;els at the Immer&longs;i­ on and Elevati­ on of solids.

In the ri&longs;ing of the Solid M, its elevation hath the &longs;ame proportion to the circumfu&longs;ed water E N S F, that the Surface of the &longs;aid water, hath to the Superficies or Ba&longs;e of the &longs;aid Solid M; which Ba&longs;e hath the &longs;ame proportion to the Surface of the water A D, that the aba&longs;e­ ment or ebbing of the water A C, hath to the ri&longs;e or elevation of the &longs;aid Solid M. Therefore, by Perturbation of proportion, in the a&longs;cent of the &longs;aid Solid M, the aba&longs;ement of the water A B C D, to the aba&longs;ement of the water E N S F, hath the &longs;ame proportion, that the Surface of the water E F, hath to the Surface of the water A D; that is, that the whole Ma&longs;s of the water E N S F, hath to the whole Ma&longs;s A B C D, being equally high: It is manife&longs;t, therefore, that in the expul&longs;ion and elevation of the Solid M, the water E N S F &longs;hall exceed in Velocity of Motion the water A B C D, a&longs;much as it on the other &longs;ide is exceeded by that in quantity: whereupon their Moments in &longs;uch operations, are mutually equall.

And, for ampler confirmation, and clearer explication of this, let us con&longs;ider the pre&longs;ent Figure, (which if I be not deceived, may &longs;erve to detect the errors of &longs;ome Practick Mechanitians, who upon a fal&longs;e founda­ tion &longs;ome times attempt impo&longs;&longs;ible enterprizes,) in which, unto the large Ve&longs;&longs;ell E I D F, the narrow Funnell or Pipe I C A B is continued, and &longs;up­ po&longs;e water infu&longs;ed into them, unto the Levell L G H, which water &longs;hall re&longs;t in this po&longs;ition, not without admiration in &longs;ome, who cannot conceive

how it can be, that the heavie charge of the great Ma&longs;s of water G D, pre&longs;&longs;ing downwards, &longs;hould not elevate and repul&longs;e the little quantity of the other, contained in the Funnell or Pipe C L, by which the de&longs;cent of it is re&longs;isted and hindered: But &longs;uch wonder &longs;hall cea&longs;e, if we begin to &longs;uppo&longs;e the water G D to be aba&longs;ed only to Q D, and &longs;hall afterwards con&longs;ider, what the water C L hath done, which to give place to the other, which is de&longs;cended from the Levell G H, to the Levell Q O, &longs;hall of nece&longs;&longs;ity have a&longs;cended in the &longs;ame time, from the Levell Lunto A B. And the a&longs;cent L B, &longs;hall be &longs;o much greater than the de­ &longs;cent G Q, by how much the breadth of the Ve&longs;&longs;ell G D, is greater than that of the Funnell I C; which, in &longs;umme, is as much as the water G D, is more than the water L C: but in regard that the Moment of the Velocity of the Motion, in one Moveable, compen&longs;ates that of the Gravity of ano­ ther, what wonder is it, if the &longs;wift a&longs;cent of the le&longs;&longs;er Water C L, &longs;hall re&longs;i&longs;t the &longs;low de&longs;cent of the greater G D?

The &longs;ame, therefore, happens in this operation, as in the Stilliard, in which a weight of two pounds counterpoy&longs;eth an other of 200, asoften as that &longs;hall move in the &longs;ame time, a &longs;pace 100 times great­ er than this: which falleth out when one Arme of the Beam is an hundred times as long as the other. Let the erroneous opinion o tho&longs;e therefore cea&longs;e, who hold that a Ship is better, and ea&longs;ter born up in a great abundance of water, then in a le&longs;&longs;er quantity, (this was believed by Ari&longs;totle in his Problems, Sect. 23, Probl. 2.) it being or the contrary true, that its po&longs;&longs;ible, that a Ship may as well float in ten Tun of water, as in an Ocean.

A &longs;hip flotes as well in ten Tun of water as in an Ocean.

A Solid &longs;peci­ fiaclly graver than the water, cannot be born up by any quan­ tity of it.

But following our matter, I &longs;ay, that by what hath been hitherto demon&longs;trated, we may under&longs;tand how, that

COROLLARY III.

One of the above named Solids, when more grave in &longs;pecie than the water, can never be &longs;u&longs;tained, by any whatever quantity of it.

For having &longs;een how that the Moment wherewith &longs;uch a Solid as grave in &longs;pecie as the water, contra&longs;ts with the Moment of any Ma&longs;s of water what&longs;oever, is able to retain it, even to its totall Submer&longs;ion: without its ever a&longs;cending; it remaineth, manife&longs;t, that the water is far le&longs;s able to rai&longs;e it up, when it exceeds the &longs;ame in &longs;pecie: &longs;o, that though you infu&longs;e water till its totall Submer&longs;ion, it &longs;hall &longs;till &longs;tay at the Bottome, and with &longs;uch Gravity, and Re&longs;i&longs;tance to Eleva­ tion, as is the exce&longs;s of its Ab&longs;olute Gravity, above the Ab&longs;olute Gra­ vity of a Ma&longs;s equall to it, made of water, or of a Matter in &longs;pecie equally grave with the water: and, though you &longs;hould moreover adde never &longs;o much water above the Levell of that which equalizeth the Altitude of the Solid, it &longs;hall not, for all that, encrea&longs;e the Pre&longs;&longs;ion or Gravitation, of the parts circumfu&longs;ed about the &longs;aid Solid, by which greater pre&longs;&longs;ion, it might come to be repul&longs;ed, becau&longs;e, the Re&longs;i&longs;tance is not made, but only by tho&longs;e parts of the water, which at the Motion of the &longs;aid Solid do al&longs;o move, and the&longs;e are tho&longs;e only, which are comprehended by the two Superficies equidi&longs;tant to the Horizon, and their parallels, that comprehend the Altitude of the Solid immerged in the water.

I conceive, I have by this time &longs;ufficiently declared and opened the way to the contemplation of the true, intrin&longs;ecall and proper Cau&longs;es of diver&longs;e Motions, and of the Re&longs;t of many Solid Bodies in diver&longs;e Mediums, and particularly in the water, &longs;hewing how all ii effect, depend on the mutuall exce&longs;&longs;es of the Gravity of the Movea­ bles and of the Mediums: and, that which did highly import, re­ moving the Objection, which peradventure would have begotter much doubting, and &longs;cruple in &longs;ome, about the verity of my Con­ clu&longs;ion, namely, how that notwith&longs;tanding, that the exce&longs;s of the Gravity of the water, above the Gravity of the Solid, demitted into it, be the cau&longs;e of its floating and ri&longs;ing from the Bottom to the Sur­ face, yet a quantity of water, that weighs not ten pounds, can rai&longs;e Solid that weighs above 100 pounds: in that we have demon&longs;tra­ ted, That it &longs;ufficeth, that &longs;uch difference be found between the Specificall Gravities of the Mediums and Moveables, let the particular and ab&longs;olute Gravities be what they will: in&longs;omuch, that a Solid, provided that it be Specifically le&longs;s grave than the water, although its ab&longs;olute weight were 1000 pounds, yet may it be born up and elevated by ten pounds of water, and le&longs;s: and on the contrary, a­ nother Solid, &longs;o that it be Specifically more grave than the water, though in ab&longs;olute Gravity it were not above a pound, yet all the water in the Sea, cannot rai&longs;e it from the Bottom, or float it. This &longs;ufficeth me, for my pre&longs;ent occa&longs;ion, to have, by the above declared Examples, di&longs;covered and demon&longs;trated, without extending &longs;uch matters farther, and, as I might have done, into a long Treati&longs;e: yea, but that there was a nece&longs;&longs;ity of re&longs;olving the above propo&longs;ed doubt, I &longs;hould have contented my &longs;elf with that only, which is demon&longs;trated by Archimedes, in his fir&longs;t Book De In&longs;identibus hu­ mido: where in generall termes he infers and confirms the &longs;ame

Conclu&longs;ions, namely, that Solids (a) le&longs;s grave than water, &longs;wim or float upon it, the (b) more grave go to the Bottom, and the (c) e­ qually grave re&longs;t indifferently in all places, yea, though they &longs;hould be wholly under water.

Of Natation

(a) Lib. 1. Prop. 4.

(b) Id. Lib. 1. Prop. 3.

(c) Id. Lib. 1. Prop. 3.

But, becau&longs;e that this Doctrine of Archimedes, peru&longs;ed, tran&longs;cri­ bed and examined by Signor France&longs;co Buonamico, in his fifth Book of Motion, Chap. 29, and afterwards by him confuted, might by the Authority of &longs;o renowned, and famous a Philo&longs;opher, be rendered dubious, and &longs;u&longs;pected of fal&longs;ity; I have judged it nece&longs;&longs;ary to de­ fend it, if I am able &longs;o to do, and to clear Archimedes, from tho&longs;e cen&longs;ures, with which he appeareth to be charged. Buonamico re­ jecteth the Doctrine of Archimedes, fir&longs;t, as not con&longs;entaneous with the Opinion of Aristotle, adding, that it was a &longs;trange thing to him, that the Water &longs;hould exceed the Earth in Gravity, &longs;eeing on the contrary, that the Gravity of water, increa&longs;eth, by means of the parti­ cipation of Earth. And he &longs;ubjoyns pre&longs;ently after, that he was not &longs;atisfied with the Rea&longs;ons of Archimedes, as not being able with that Doctrine, to a&longs;&longs;ign the cau&longs;e whence it comes, that a Boat and a Ve&longs;&longs;ell, which otherwi&longs;e, floats above the water, doth &longs;ink to the Bottom, if once it be filled with water; that by rea&longs;on of the e­ quality of Gravity, between the water within it, and the other water without, it &longs;hould &longs;tay a top; but yet, neverthele&longs;s, we &longs;ee it to go to the Bottom.

The Authors defence of Ar­ chimedes his Do­ ctrine, again&longs;t the oppo&longs;itions of Buonamico.

His fir&longs;t Objecti­ on again&longs;t the Doctrine of Ar­ chimedes.

His Second Ob­ jection.

His third Obje­ ction.

His &longs;ourth Ob­ jection.

He farther addes, that Ari&longs;totle had clearly confuted the Ancients, who &longs;aid, that light Bodies moved upwards, driven by the impul&longs;e

of the more grave Ambient: which if it were &longs;o, it &longs;hould &longs;eem of nece&longs;&longs;ity to follow, that all naturall Bodies are by nature heavy, and none light: For that the &longs;ame would befall the Fire and Air, if put in the Bottom of the water. And, howbeit, Ari&longs;totle grants a Pul&longs;ion in the Elements, by which the Earth is reduced into a Sphe­ ricall Figure, yet neverthele&longs;s, in his judgement, it is not &longs;uch that it can remove grave Bodies from their naturall places, but rather, that it &longs;end them toward the Centre, to which (as he &longs;omewhat ob&longs;curely continues to &longs;ay,) the water principally moves, if it in the interim meet not with &longs;omething that re&longs;i&longs;ts it, and, by its Gravity, thru&longs;ts it out of its place: in which ca&longs;e, if it cannot directly, yet at lea&longs;t as well as it can, it tends to the Centre: but it happens, that light Bodies by &longs;uch Impul&longs;ion, do all a&longs;cend upward: but this properly they have by nature, as al&longs;o, that other of &longs;wimming. He concludes, la&longs;tly, that he concurs with Archimedes in his Conclu&longs;ions; but not in the Cau&longs;es, which he would referre to the facile and difficult Sepa­ ration of the Medium, and to the predominance of the Elements, &longs;o that when the Moveable &longs;uperates the power of the Medium; as for example, Lead doth the Continuity of water, it &longs;hall move thorow it, el&longs;e not.

The Ancients denved Ao&longs;olute Levity.

The cau&longs;es of Natation & Sub­ mer&longs;ion, accord­ ing to the Peri­ pateticks.

This is all that I have been able to collect, as produced again&longs;t Archimedes by Signor Buonamico: who hath not well ob&longs;erved the Principles and Suppo&longs;itions of Archimedes; which yet mu&longs;t be fal&longs;e, if the Doctrine be fal&longs;e, which depends upon them; but is contented to alledge therein &longs;ome Inconveniences, and &longs;ome Repug­ nances to the Doctrine and Opinion of Ari&longs;totle. In an&longs;wer to which Objections, I &longs;ay, fir&longs;t, That the being of Archimedes Doctrine, &longs;im­ ply different from the Doctrine of Ari&longs;totle, ought not to move any to &longs;u&longs;pect it, there being no cau&longs;e, why the Authority of this &longs;hould be preferred to the Authority of the other: but, becau&longs;e, where the decrees of Nature are indifferently expo&longs;ed to the intellectuall eyes of each, the Authority of the one and the other, lo&longs;eth all anthentical­ ne&longs;s of Per&longs;wa&longs;ion, the ab&longs;olute power re&longs;iding in Rea&longs;on; therefore I pa&longs;s to that which he alledgeth in the &longs;econd place, as an ab&longs;urd con­ &longs;equent of the Doctrine of Archimedes, namely, That water &longs;hould be more grave than Earth. But I really find not, that ever Archi­ medes &longs;aid &longs;uch a thing, or that it can be rationally deduced from his Conclu&longs;ions: and if that were manife&longs;t unto me, I verily believe, I &longs;hould renounce his Doctrine, as mo&longs;t erroneous. Perhapsthis Dedu­ ction of Buonamico, is founded upon that which he citeth of the Ve­ &longs;&longs;el, which &longs;wims as long as its voyd of water, but once full it &longs;inks to the Bottom, and under&longs;tanding it of a Ve&longs;&longs;el of Earth, he infers again&longs;t Archimedes thus: Thou &longs;ay&longs;t that the Solids which &longs;wim, are le&longs;s grave than water: this Ve&longs;&longs;ell &longs;wimmeth: therefore, this Ve&longs;&longs;ell is le&longs;&longs;e grave than water. If this be the Illation. I ea&longs;ily an&longs;wer, granting that this Ve&longs;&longs;ell is le&longs;&longs;e grave than water, and denying the other con&longs;equence, namely, that Earth is le&longs;s Grave than Water. The Ve&longs;&longs;el that &longs;wims occupieth in the water, not only a place equall to the Ma&longs;s of the Earth, of which it is formed; but equall to the Earth and to the Air together, contained in its concavity. And, if &longs;uch a Ma&longs;s compoun­ ded of Earth and Air, &longs;hall be le&longs;s grave than &longs;uch another quantity of water, it &longs;hall &longs;wim, and &longs;hall accord with the Doctrine of Archi­ medes; but if, again, removing the Air, the Ve&longs;&longs;ell &longs;hall be filled with water, &longs;o that the Solid put in the water, be nothing but Earth, nor occupieth other place, than that which is only po&longs;&longs;e&longs;t by Earth, it &longs;hall then go to the Bottom, by rea&longs;on that the Earth is heavier than the water: and this corre&longs;ponds well with the meaning of Archimedes. See the &longs;ame effect illu&longs;trated, with &longs;uch another Experiment, In pre&longs;&longs;ing a Viall Gla&longs;s to the Bottom of the water, when it is full of Air, it will meet with great re&longs;i&longs;tance, becau&longs;e it is not the Gla&longs;s alone, that is pre&longs;&longs;ed under water, but together with the Gla&longs;s a great Ma&longs;s of Air, and &longs;uch, that if you &longs;hould take as much water, as the Ma&longs;s of the Gla&longs;s, and of the Air contained in it, you would have a weight much greater than that of the Viall, and of its Air: and, therefore, it will not &longs;ubmerge without great violence: but if we demit only the Gla&longs;s into the water, which &longs;hall be when you &longs;hall fill the Gla&longs;s with water, then &longs;hall the Gla&longs;s de&longs;cend to the Bottom; as &longs;uperiour in Gravity to the water.

The Authors an­ &longs;wer to the fir&longs;t Objection.

The Authors an­ &longs;wer to the &longs;e­ cond Objection.

Returning, therefore, to our fir&longs;t purpo&longs;e; I &longs;ay, that Earth is more grave than water, and that therefore, a Solid of Earth goeth to the bottom of it; but one may po&longs;&longs;ibly make a compo&longs;ition of Earth and Air, which &longs;hall be le&longs;s grave than a like Ma&longs;s of Water; and this &longs;hall &longs;wim: and yet both this and the other experiment &longs;hall very well accord with the Doctrine of Archimedes. But becau&longs;e that in my judgment it hath nothing of difficulty in it, I will not po&longs;itive­ ly affirme that Signor Buonamico, would by &longs;uch a di&longs;cour&longs;e object unto Archimedes the ab&longs;urdity of inferring by his doctrine, that Earth was le&longs;s grave than Water, though I know not how to conceive what other accident he could have induced thence.

Perhaps &longs;uch a Probleme (in my judgement fal&longs;e) was read by Signor Buonamico in &longs;ome other Author, by whom peradventure it was attributed as a &longs;ingular propertie, of &longs;ome particular Water, and &longs;o comes now to be u&longs;ed with a double errour in confutation of Ar­ chimedes, &longs;ince he &longs;aith no &longs;uch thing, nor by him that did &longs;ay it was it meant of the common Element of Water.

The third difficulty in the doctrine of Archimedes was, that he could not render a rea&longs;on whence it aro&longs;e, that a piece of Wood, and a Ve&longs;&longs;ell of Wood, which otherwi&longs;e floats, goeth to the bottom, if filled with Water. Signor Buonamico hath &longs;uppo&longs;ed that a Ver&longs;&longs;ell of Wood, and of Wood that by nature &longs;wims, as before is &longs;aid, goes to the bottom, if it be filled with water; of which he in the fol­ lowing Chapter, which is the 30 of the fifth Book copiou&longs;ly di&longs;cour&longs;­ eth: but I (&longs;peaking alwayes without diminution of his &longs;ingular Learning) dare in defence of Archimedes deny this experiment, being certain that a piece of Wood which by its nature &longs;inks not in Water, &longs;hall not &longs;inke though it be turned and converted into the forme of a­ ny Ve&longs;&longs;ell what&longs;oever, and then filled with Water: and he that would readily &longs;ee the Experiment in &longs;ome other tractable Matter, and that is ea&longs;ily reduced into &longs;everal Figures, may take pure Wax, and ma­ king it fir&longs;t into a Ball or other &longs;olid Figure, let him adde to it &longs;o much Lead as &longs;hall ju&longs;t carry it to the bottome, &longs;o that being a graine le&longs;s it could not be able to &longs;inke it, and making it afterwards into the forme of a Di&longs;h, and filling it with Water, he &longs;hall finde that with­ out the &longs;aid Lead it &longs;hall not &longs;inke, and that with the Lead it &longs;hall de­ &longs;cend with much &longs;lowne&longs;s: & in &longs;hort he &longs;hall &longs;atisfie him&longs;elf, that the Water included makes no alteration. I &longs;ay not all this while, but that its po&longs;&longs;ible of Wood to make Barkes, which being filled with water, &longs;inke; but that proceeds not through its Gravity, encrea&longs;ed by the Water, but rather from the Nailes and other Iron Workes, &longs;o that it no longer hath a Body le&longs;s grave than Water, but one mixt of Iron and Wood, more grave than a like Ma&longs;&longs;e of Water. Therefore let Signor Buonamico de&longs;i&longs;t from de&longs;iring a rea&longs;on of an effect, that is not in nature: yea if the &longs;inking of the Woodden Ve&longs;&longs;ell when its full of Water, may call in que&longs;tion the Doctrine of Archimedes, which he would not have you to follow, is on the contrary con&longs;onant and a­ greeable to the Doctrine of the Peripateticks, &longs;ince it aptly a&longs;&longs;ignes a rea&longs;on why &longs;uch a Ve&longs;&longs;ell mu&longs;t, when its full of Water, de&longs;cend to the bottom; converting the Argument the other way, we may with &longs;afety &longs;ay that the Doctrine of Archimedes is true, &longs;ince it aptly agre­ eth with true experiments, and que&longs;tion the other, who&longs;e Deducti­ ons are fa&longs;tened upon etroneou&longs;s Conclu&longs;ions. As for the other point hinted in this &longs;ame In&longs;tance, where it &longs;eemes that Benonamico under­ &longs;tands the &longs;ame not only of a piece of wood, &longs;haped in the forme of a Ve&longs;&longs;ell, but al&longs;o of ma&longs;&longs;ie Wood, which filled, &longs;cilicet, as I believe, he would &longs;ay, &longs;oaked and &longs;teeped in Water, goes finally to the bottom that happens in &longs;ome poro&longs;e Woods, which, while their Poro&longs;ity is re­ pleni&longs;hed with Air, or other Matter le&longs;s grave than Water, are Ma&longs;­ &longs;es &longs;pecificially le&longs;s grave than the &longs;aid Water, like as is that Viall of Gla&longs;s while&longs;t it is full of Air: but when, &longs;uch light Matter depart­ ing, there &longs;ucceedeth Water into the &longs;ame Poro&longs;ities and Cavities, there re&longs;ults a compound of Water and Gla&longs;s more grave than a like Ma&longs;s of Water: but the exce&longs;s of its Gravity con&longs;i&longs;ts in the Matter of the Gla&longs;s, and not in the Water, which cannot be graver than it &longs;elf: &longs;o that which remaines of the Wood, the Air of its Cavi­ ties departing, if it &longs;hall be more grave in &longs;pecie than Water, fil but its Poro&longs;ities with Water, and you &longs;hal have a Compo&longs;t of Water and of Wood more grave than Water, but not by vertue of the Water re­ ceived into and imbibed by the Poro&longs;ities, but of that Matter of the Wood which remains when the Air is departed: and being &longs;uch it &longs;hall, according to the Doctrine of Archimedes, goe to the bottom, like as before, according to the &longs;ame Doctrine it did &longs;wim.

The Authors an­ &longs;wer to the third Objection.

As to that finally which pre&longs;ents it &longs;elf in the fourth place, namely, that the Ancients have been heretofore confuted by Ari&longs;totle, who denying Po&longs;itive and Ab&longs;olute Levity, and truely e&longs;teeming all Bo­ dies to be grave, &longs;aid, that that which moved upward was driven by the circumambient Air, and therefore that al&longs;o the Doctrine of Archimedes, as an adherent to &longs;uch an Opinion was con­ victed and confuted: I an&longs;wer fir&longs;t, that Signor Buonamico in my judgement hath impo&longs;ed upon Archimedes, and deduced from his words more than ever he intended by them, or may from his Propo­ &longs;itions be collected, in regard that Archimedes neither denies, nor ad­ mitteth Po&longs;itive Levity, nor doth he &longs;o much as mention it: &longs;o that much le&longs;s ought Buonamico to inferre, that he hath denyed that it might be the Cau&longs;e and Principle of the A&longs;cen&longs;ion of Fire, and other Light Bodies: having but only demon&longs;trated, that Solid Bodies more grave than Water de&longs;cend in it, according to the exce&longs;s of their Gravity above the Gravity of that, he demon&longs;trates likewi&longs;e, how the le&longs;s grave a&longs;cend in the &longs;ame Water, accordng to its exce&longs;s of Gra­ ty, above the Gravity of them. So that the mo&longs;t that can be gather­ ed from the Dem on&longs;tration of Archimedes is, that like as the exce&longs;s of the Gravity of the Moveable above the Gravity of the Water, is the Cau&longs;e that it de&longs;cends therein, &longs;o the exce&longs;s of the Gravity of the water above that of the Moveable, is a &longs;ufficient Cau&longs;e why it de&longs;­ cends not, but rather betakes it &longs;elf to &longs;wim: not enquiring whe­ ther of moving upwards there is, or is not any other Cau&longs;e contrary to Gravity: nor doth Archimedes di&longs;cour&longs;e le&longs;s properly than if one &longs;hould &longs;ay: If the South Winde &longs;hall a&longs;&longs;ault the Barke with greater Impetus than is the violence with which the Streame of the River car­ ries it towards the South, the motion of it &longs;hall be towards the North: but if the Impetus of the Water &longs;hall overcome that of the Winde, its motion &longs;hall be towards the South. The di&longs;cour&longs;e is excellent and would be unworthily contradicted by &longs;uch as &longs;hould oppo&longs;e it, &longs;aying: Thou mi&longs;-alledge&longs;t as Cau&longs;e of the motion of the Bark towards the South, the Impetus of the Stream of the Water above that of the South Winde; mi&longs;-alledge&longs;t I &longs;ay, for it is the Force of the North Winde oppo&longs;ite to the South, that is able to drive the Bark towards the South. Such an Objection would be &longs;uperfluous, becau&longs;e he which alledgeth for Cau&longs;e of the Motion the &longs;tream of the Water, denies not but that the Winde oppo&longs;ite to the South may do the &longs;ame, but only affirmeth that the force of the Water prevailing over the South Wind, the Bark &longs;hall move towards the South: and &longs;aith no more than is true. And ju&longs;t thus when Archimedes &longs;aith, that the Gravity of the Water prevailing over that by which the moveable de&longs;cends to the Bottom, &longs;uch moveable &longs;hall be rai&longs;ed from the Bottom to the Sur­ face alledgeth a very true Cau&longs;e of &longs;uch an Accident, nor doth he af­ firm or deny that there is, or is not, a vertue contrary to Gravity, called by &longs;ome Levity, that hath al&longs;o a power of moving &longs;ome Matters up wards. Let therefore the Weapons of Signor Buonamico be directed a­ gain&longs;t Plato, and other Ancients, who totally denying Levity, and taking all Bodies to be grave, &longs;ay that the Motion upwards is made, not from an intrin&longs;ecal Principle of the Moveable, but only by the Im­ pul&longs;e of the Medium; and let Archimedes and his Doctrine e&longs;cape him, &longs;ince he hath given him no Cau&longs;e of quarelling with him But if this Apologie, produced in defence of Archimedes, &longs;hould &longs;een to &longs;ome in&longs;ufficient to free him from the Objections and Arguments produced by Ari&longs;totle again&longs;t Plato, and the other Ancients, as if they did al&longs;o fight again&longs;t Archimedes, alledging the Impul&longs;e of the Water as the Cau&longs;e of the &longs;wimming of &longs;ome Bodies le&longs;s grave than it, I would not que&longs;tion, but that I &longs;hould be able to maintaine the Doctrine of Plato and tho&longs;e others to be mo&longs;t true, who ab&longs;olutely deny Levity, and affirm no other Intrin&longs;ecal Principle of Motion to be in Elemen­ tary Bodies &longs;ave only that towards the Centre of the Earth, nor no other Cau&longs;e of moving upwards, &longs;peaking of that which hath the re­ &longs;emblance of natural Motion, but only the repul&longs;e of the Medium, &longs;luid, and exceeding the Gravity of the Moveable: and as to the Rea&longs;ons of Ari&longs;totle on the contrary, I believe that I could be able fully to an&longs;wer them, and I would a&longs;&longs;ay to do it, if it were ab&longs;olutely nece&longs;&longs;a­ ry to the pre&longs;ent Matter, or were it not too long a Digre&longs;&longs;ion for this &longs;hort Treati&longs;e. I will only &longs;ay, that if there were in &longs;ome of our Elle­ mentary Bodies an Intrin&longs;ecall Principle and Naturall Inclination to &longs;hun the Centre of the Earth, and to move towards the Concave of the Moon, &longs;uch Bodies, without doubt, would more &longs;wiftly a&longs;cend through tho&longs;e Mediums that lea&longs;t oppo&longs;e the Velocity of the Moveable, and the&longs;e are the more tenuous and &longs;ubtle; as is, for example, the Air in compari&longs;on of the Water, we daily proving that we can with farre more expeditious Velocity move a Hand or a Board to and a­ gain in one than in the other: neverthele&longs;s, we never could finde any Body, that did not a&longs;cend much more &longs;wiftly in the water than in the Air. Yea of Bodies which we &longs;ee continually to a&longs;cend in the Water, there is none that having arrived to the confines of the Air, do not whol­ ly lo&longs;e their Motion; even the Air it &longs;elf, which ri&longs;ing with great Ce­ lerity through the Water, being once come to its Region it lo&longs;eth all

The Authors an&longs;wer to the fourth Object­ ion.

Of Natation, Lib. 1. Prop. 7.

Of Natation, Lib. 1. Prop. 4.

Plato denyeth Po&longs;itive Levi­ ty.

The Authors defence of the doctrine of Plato and the Ancients, who ab&longs;olutely deny Levity:

According to Plato there is no Principle of the Motion of de­ &longs;cent in Naturall Bodies, &longs;ave that to the Centre.

No cau&longs;e of the motion of A cent, &longs;ave the Impul&longs;e of the Medium, exceed­ ing the Move­ able in Gravi­ tie.

Bodies a&longs;cend much &longs;wifter in the Water, than in the Air.

All Bodies a&longs;­ cending through Water, lo&longs;e their Motion, comming to the confines of the Air.

And, howbeit, Experience &longs;hewes, that the Bodies, &longs;ucce&longs;&longs;ively le&longs;s grave, do mo&longs;t expeditiou&longs;ly a&longs;cend in water, it cannot be doubt­ ed, but that the Ignean Exhalations do a&longs;cend more &longs;wiftly through the water, than doth the Air: which Air is &longs;een by Experi­ ence to a&longs;cend more &longs;wiftly through the Water, than the Fiery Exha­ lations through the Air: Therefore, we mu&longs;t of nece&longs;&longs;ity conclude, that the &longs;aid Exhalations do much more expeditiou&longs;ly a&longs;cend through the Water, than through the Air; and that, con&longs;equently, they are moved by the Impul&longs;e of the Ambient Medium, and not by an intrin­ &longs;ick Principle that is in them, of avoiding the Centre of the Earth; to which other grave Bodies tend.

The lighter Bodies al&longs;end more &longs;wiftly through Water.

Fiery Exhalati­ ons ascend tho­ row the Water more &longs;wiftly than doth the Air; & the Air a&longs;cends more &longs;wiftly thorow the Water, than Fire thorow the Air.

To that which for a finall conclu&longs;ion, Signor Buonamico produceth of going about to reduce the de&longs;cending or not de&longs;cending, to the ea&longs;ie and unea&longs;ie Divi&longs;ion of the Medium, and to the predominancy of the Elements: I an&longs;wer, as to the fir&longs;t part, that that cannot in any manner be admitted as a Cau&longs;e, being that in none of the Fluid Mediums, as the Air, the Water, and other Liquids, there is any Re&longs;i&longs;tance again&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, but all by every the lea&longs;t Force, are di­ vided and penetrated, as I will anon demon&longs;trate: &longs;o, that of &longs;uch Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion there can be no Act, &longs;ince it &longs;elf is not in be­ ing. As to the other part, I &longs;ay, that the predominancy of the Ele­ ments in Moveables, is to be con&longs;idered, as far as to the exce&longs;&longs;e or defect of Gravity, in relation to the Medium: for in that Action, the Elements operate not, but only, &longs;o far as they are grave or light: therefore, to &longs;ay that the Wood of the Firre &longs;inks not, becau&longs;e Air predominateth in it, is no more than to &longs;ay, becau&longs;e it is le&longs;s grave than the Water. Yea, even the immediate Cau&longs;e, is its being le&longs;s grave than the Water: and it being under the predominancy of the Air, is the Cau&longs;e of its le&longs;s Gravity: Therefore, he that alledgeth the predominancy of the Element for a Cau&longs;e, brings the Cau&longs;e of the Cau&longs;e, and not the neere&longs;t and immediate Cau&longs;e. Now, who knows not that the true Cau&longs;e is the immediate, and not the mediate? Moreover, he that alledgeth Gravity, brings a Cau&longs;e mo&longs;t per&longs;picuous to Sence: The cau&longs;e we may very ea&longs;ily a&longs;&longs;ertain our &longs;elves; whether Ebony, for example, and Firre, be more or le&longs;s grave than water: but whether Earth or Air predominates in them, who &longs;hall make that manife&longs;t? Certainly, no Experiment can better do it than to ob&longs;erve whether they &longs;wim or &longs;ink. So, that he who knows, not whether &longs;uch a Solid &longs;wims, unle&longs;s when he knows that Air pre­ dominates in it, knows not whether it &longs;wim, unle&longs;s he &longs;ees it &longs;wim, for then he knows that it &longs;wims, when he knows that it is Air that predominates, but knows not that Air hath the predominance, unle&longs;s he &longs;ees it &longs;wim: therefore, he knows not if it &longs;wims, till &longs;uch time as he hath &longs;een it &longs;wim.

The Authors confutation of the Peripateticks Cau&longs;es of Nata­ tion & Submer&longs;i­ on.

Water & other fluids void of Re&longs;i&longs;tance a­ gain&longs;t Divi&longs;ion.

The predomi­ nancy of Ele­ ments in Move­ ables to be con­ &longs;idered only in relation to their excefs or defect of Gravity in reference to the Medium.

The immedi­ ate Cau&longs;e of Na­ tation is that the Moveable is le&longs;s grave than the Water.

The Peripate­ ticks alledge for the rea&longs;on of Natation the Cau&longs;e of the Cau&longs;e.

Gravity a Cau&longs;e mo&longs;t per­ &longs;picuous to &longs;ence:

Let us not then de&longs;pi&longs;e tho&longs;e Hints, though very dark, which Rea&longs;on, after &longs;ome contemplation, offereth to our Intelligence, and lets be content to be taught by Archimedes, that then any Body &longs;hall &longs;ubmerge in water, when it &longs;hall be &longs;pecifically more grave than it and that if it &longs;hall be le&longs;s grave, it &longs;hall of nece&longs;&longs;ity &longs;wim, and that it will re&longs;t indifferently in any place under water, if its Gravity be perfectly like to that of the water.

Lib 1. of Na­ tation Prop. 7.

Id. Lib. 1. Prop. 4.

Id. Lib. 1: Prop. 3.

The&longs;e things explained and proved, I come to con&longs;ider that which offers it &longs;elf, touching what the Diver&longs;ity of figure given unto the &longs;aid Moveable hath to do with the&longs;e Motions and Re&longs;ts; and pro­ ceed to affirme, that,

THEOREME V.

The diver&longs;ity of Figures given to this or that Solid

cannot any way be a Cau&longs;e of its ab&longs;olute Sinking or Swimming.

Diver&longs;ity of Figure no Cau&longs;e of its ab&longs;olute Natation or Sub­ mer&longs;ion.

So that if a Solid being formed, for example, into a Spherical Figure, doth &longs;ink or &longs;wim in the water, I &longs;ay, that being formed into any other Figure, the &longs;ame figure in the &longs;ame water, &longs;hall &longs;ink or &longs;wim: nor can &longs;uch its Motion by the Expan&longs;ion or by o­ ther mutation of Figure, be impeded or taken away.

The Expan&longs;i­ on of Figure, re­ tards the Veloci­ ty of the a&longs;cent or de&longs;cent of the Moveable in the water; but doth not deprive it of all Motion.

The Expan&longs;ion of the Figure may indeed retard its Velocity, a&longs; well of a&longs;cent as de&longs;cent, and more and more according as the &longs;aid Fi­ gure is reduced to a greater breadth and thinne&longs;s: but that it may bere duced to &longs;uch a form as that that &longs;ame matter be wholly hindred from moving in the &longs;ame water, that I hold to be impo&longs;&longs;ible. In this I have met with great contradictors, who producing &longs;ome Experiments, and in perticular a thin Board of Ebony, and a Ball of the &longs;ame Wood and &longs;hewing how the Ball in Water de&longs;cended to the bottom, and the Board being put lightly upon the Water &longs;ubmerged not, but re&longs;t­ ed; have held, and with the Authority of Ari&longs;totle, confirmed them &longs;elves in their Opinions, that the Cau&longs;e of that Re&longs;t was the breadth of the Figure, u able by its &longs;mall weight to pierce and penetrate the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Waters Cra&longs;&longs;itude, which Re&longs;i&longs;tance is readily o­ vercome by the other Sphericall Figure.

This is the Principal point in the pre&longs;ent Que&longs;tion, in which I per­ &longs;wade my &longs;elf to be on the right &longs;ide.

Therefore, beginning to inve&longs;tigate with the examination of ex­ qui&longs;ite Experiments that really the Figure doth not a jot alter the de&longs;­ cent or A&longs;cent of the &longs;ame Solids, and having already demon&longs;tra­ ted that the greater or le&longs;s Gravity of the Solid in relation to the Gra­ vity of the Medium is the cau&longs;e of De&longs;cent or A&longs;cent: when ever we would make proof of that, which about this Effect the diver&longs;ity of Fi­ gure worketh, its nece&longs;&longs;ary to make the Experiment with Matter wherein variety of Gravities hath no place. For making u&longs;e of Mat­ ters which may be different in their Specifical Gravities, and meeting with varieties of effects of A&longs;cending and De&longs;cending, we &longs;hall al­ wayes be left un&longs;atisfied whether that diver&longs;ity derive it &longs;elf really from the &longs;ole Figure, or el&longs;e from the divers Gravity al&longs;o. We may remedy this by takeing one only Matter, that is tractable and ea&longs;ily reduceable into every &longs;ort of Figure. Moreover, it wil be an excellent expedient to take a kinde of Matter, exactly alike in Gravity unto the Water: for that Matter, as far as pertaines to the Gravity, is in­ different either to A&longs;cend or De&longs;cend; &longs;o that we may pre&longs;ently ob­ &longs;erve any the lea&longs;t difference that derives it &longs;elf from the diver&longs;ity of Figure.

Now to do this, Wax is mo&longs;t apt, which, be&longs;ides its incapacity of

receiveing any &longs;en&longs;ible alteration from its imbibing of Water, is duct­ ile or pliant, and the &longs;ame piece is ea&longs;ily reduceable into all Figures: and being in &longs;pecie a very incon&longs;iderable matter inferiour in Gravity to the Water, by mixing therewith a little of the fileings of Lead it is reduced to a Gravity exactly equall to that of the Water.

An Experi­ ment in Wax, that proveth Fi­ gute to have no Operation in Natation & Sub­ mer&longs;ion.

This Matter prepared, and, for example, a Ball being made there­ of as bigge as an Orange or biger, and that made &longs;o grave as to &longs;ink to the bottom, but &longs;o lightly, that takeing thence one only Grain of Lead, it returnes to the top, and being added, it &longs;ubmergeth to the bottom, let the &longs;ame Wax afterwards be made into a very broad and thin Flake or Cake; and then, returning to make the &longs;ame Ex­ periment, you &longs;hall &longs;ee that it being put to the bottom, it &longs;hall, with the Grain of Lead re&longs;t below, and that Grain deducted, it &longs;hall a&longs;cend to the very Surface, and added again it &longs;hall dive to the bottom. And this &longs;ame effect &longs;hall happen alwaies in all &longs;ort of Figures, as wel re­ gular as irregular: nor &longs;hall you ever finde any that will &longs;wim with­ out the removall of the Grain of Lead, or &longs;inke to the bottom unle&longs;s it be added: and, in &longs;hort, about the going or not going to the Bot­ tom, you &longs;hall di&longs;cover no diver&longs;ity, although, indeed, you &longs;hall about the quick and &longs;low de&longs;cent: for the more expatiated and di&longs;tended Figures move more &longs;lowly a&longs;wel in the diveing to the bottom as in the ri&longs;ing to the top; and the other more contracted and compact Fi­ gures, more &longs;peedily. Now I know not what may be expected from the diver&longs;ity of Figures, if the mo&longs;t contrary to one another operate not &longs;o much as doth a very &longs;mall Grain of Lead, added or removed.

Me thinkes I hear &longs;ome of the Adver&longs;aries to rai&longs;e a doubt upon my produced Experiment. And fir&longs;t, that they offer to my con&longs;idera­ tion, that the Figure, as a Figure &longs;imply, and disjunct from the Matter workes not any effect, but requires to be conjoyned with the Matter­ and, furthermore, not with every Matter, but with tho&longs;e only, wherewith it may be able ro execute the de&longs;ired operation. Like as we &longs;ee it verified by Experience, that the Acute and &longs;harp Angle is more apt to cut, than the Obtu&longs;e; yet alwaies provided, that both the one and the other, be joyned with a Matter apt to cut, as for example, with Steel. Therefore, a Knife with a fine and &longs;harp edge, cuts Bread or Wood with much ea&longs;e, which it will not do, if the edge be blunt and thick: but he that will in&longs;tead of Steel, take Wax, and mould it into a Knife, undoubtedly &longs;hall never know the effects of &longs;harp and blunt edges: becau&longs;e neither of them will cut, the Wax being unable by rea&longs;on of its flexibility, to overcome the hardne&longs;s of the Wood and Bread. And, therefore, applying the like di&longs;cour&longs;e to our purpo&longs;e, they &longs;ay, that the difference of Figure will &longs;hew different effects, touching Natation and Submer&longs;ion, but not conjoyned with any kind of Matter, but only with tho&longs;e Matters which, by their Gravity, are apt to re&longs;i&longs;t the Velocity of the water, whence he that would elect for the Matter, Cork or other light wood unable, through its Levity, to &longs;uperate the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water, and of that Matter &longs;hould forme Solids of divers Figures, woulld in vain &longs;eek to find out what operation Figure hath in Natation or Sub­ mer&longs;ion; becau&longs;e all would &longs;wim, and that not through any property of this or that Figure, but through the debility of the Matter, want­ ing &longs;o much Gravity, as is requi&longs;ite to &longs;uperate and overcome the Den&longs;ity and Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water.

An objection a­ gain&longs;t the Expe­ riment in Wax.

Its needfull, therefore, if wee would &longs;ee the effect wrought by the Diver&longs;ity of Figure, fir&longs;t to make choice of a Matter of its nature apt to penetrate the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water. And, for this effect, they have made choice of &longs;uch a Matter, as fit, that being readily re­ duced into Sphericall Figure, goes to the Bottom; and it is Ebony of which they afterwards making a &longs;mall Board or Splinter, as thin as a Lath, have illu&longs;trated how that this, put upon the Surface of the water, re&longs;ts there without de&longs;cending to the Bottom: and making, on the other&longs;ide, of the &longs;ame wood a Ball, no le&longs;s than a hazell Nut, they &longs;hew, that this &longs;wims not, but de&longs;cendes. From which Experi­ ment, they think they may frankly conclude, that the Breadth ofthe Figure in the flat Lath or Board, is the cau&longs;e of its not de&longs;cendingto the Bottom, fora&longs;much as a Ball of the &longs;ame Matter, not different from the Board in any thing but in Figure, &longs;ubmergeth in the &longs;ame water to the Bottom. The di&longs;cour&longs;e and the Experiment hath really &longs;o much of probability and likely hood of truth in it, that it would be no wonder, if many per&longs;waded by a certain cur&longs;ory ob&longs;ervation, &longs;hould yield credit to it; neverthele&longs;s, I think I am able to di&longs;cover, how that it is not free from falacy.

An Experi­ ment in Ebany, brought to di&longs;­ prove the Expe­ timent in Wax.

Beginning, therefore, to examine one by one, all the particulars that have been produced, I &longs;ay, that Figures, as &longs;imple Figures, not only operate not in naturall things, but neither are they ever &longs;eperated from the Corporeall &longs;ub&longs;tance: nor have I ever alledged them &longs;tript of &longs;en&longs;ible Matter, like as al&longs;o I freely admit, that in our endeavour­ ing to examine the Diver&longs;ity of Accidents, dependant upon the va­ riety of Figures, it is nece&longs;&longs;ary to apply them to Matters, which ob­ &longs;truct not the various operations of tho&longs;e various Figures: and I ad­ mit and grant, that I &longs;hould do very ill, if I would experiment the in­ fluence of Acutene&longs;&longs;e of edge with a Knife of Wax, applying it to cut an Oak, becau&longs;e there is no Acutene&longs;s in Wax able to cut that very hard wood. But yet &longs;uch an Experiment of this Knife, would not be be&longs;ides the purpo&longs;e, to cut curded Milk, or other very yielding Matter: yea, in &longs;uch like Matters, the Wax is more commodious than Steel; for finding the diver&longs;ity depending upon Angles, more or le&longs;s Acute, for that Milk is indifferently cut with a Rai&longs;or, and with a Knife, that hath a blunt edge. It needs, therefore, that regard be had, not only to the hardne&longs;s, &longs;olidity or Gravity of Bodies, which under divers figures, are to divide and penetrate &longs;ome Matters, but it forceth al&longs;o, that regard be had, on the other &longs;ide, to the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Matters, to be divided and penetrated. But &longs;ince I have in making the Experiment concerning our Conte&longs;t, cho&longs;en a Matter which penetrates the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the water; and in all figures de&longs;­ cendes to the Bottome, the Adver&longs;aries can charge me with no defect; yea, I have propounded &longs;o much a more excellent Method than they, in as much as I have removed all other Cau&longs;es, of de&longs;cending or not de&longs;cending to the Bottom, and retained the only &longs;ole and pure variety of Figures, demon&longs;trating that the &longs;ame Figures all de&longs;cende with the only alteration of a Grain in weight: which Grain being removed, they return to float and &longs;wim; it is not true, therefore, (re&longs;uming the Example by them introduced) that I have gon about to experiment the efficacy of Acutene&longs;s, in cutting with Matters un­ able to cut, but with Matters proportioned to our occa&longs;ion; &longs;ince they are &longs;ubjected to no other variety, then that alone which depends on the Figure more or le&longs;s a cute.

Figure is un­ &longs;eperable from Corporeall Sub­ &longs;tance.

The an&longs;wer to the Objection a­ gain&longs;t the Expe­ riment of the Wax.

But let us proceed a little farther, and ob&longs;erve, how that indeed the Con&longs;ideration, which, they &longs;ay, ought to be had about the Election of the Matter, to the end, that it may be proportionate for the ma­ king of our experiment, is needle&longs;ly introduced, declaring by the ex­ ample of Cutting, that like as Acutene&longs;s is in&longs;ufficient to cut, unle&longs;s when it is in a Matter hard and apt to &longs;uperate the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the wood or other Matter, which we intend to cut; &longs;o the aptitude of de&longs;cending or notde&longs;cending in water, ought and can only be known in tho&longs;e Matters, that are able to overcome the Renitence, and &longs;upe­ rate the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water. Unto which, I &longs;ay, that to make di&longs;tinction and election, more of this than of that Matter, on which to impre&longs;s the Figures for cutting or penetrating this or that Body, as the &longs;olidity or obduratene&longs;s of the &longs;aid Bodies &longs;hall be greater or le&longs;s, is very nece&longs;&longs;ary: but withall I &longs;ubjoyn, that &longs;uch di&longs;tinct­ ion, election and caution would be &longs;uperfluous and unprofitable, if the Body to be cut or penetrated, &longs;hould have no Re&longs;i&longs;tance, or &longs;hould not at all with&longs;tand the Cutting or Penitration: and if the Knife were to be u&longs;ed in cutting a Mi&longs;t or Smoak, one of Paper would be equally &longs;erviceable with one of Dama&longs;cus Steel: and &longs;o by rea&longs;on the water hath not any Re&longs;i&longs;tance again&longs;t the Penitration of any Solid Body, all choice of Matter is &longs;uperfluous and needle&longs;s, and the Election which I &longs;aid above to have been well made of a Matter reciprocall in Gravity to water, was not becau&longs;e it was ne­ ce&longs;&longs;ary, for the overcoming of the cra&longs;&longs;iitude of the water, but its Gravity, with which only it re&longs;i&longs;ts the &longs;inking of Solid Bodies: and for what concerneth the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the cra&longs;&longs;itude, if we narrowly con&longs;ider it, we &longs;hall find that all Solid Bodies, as well tho&longs;e that &longs;ink, as tho&longs;e that &longs;wim, are indifferently accomodated and apt to bring us to the knowledge of the truth in que&longs;tion. Nor will I be frighted out of the belief of the&longs;e Conclu&longs;ions, by the Experi­ ments which may be produced again&longs;t me, of many &longs;everall Woods, Corks, Galls, and, moreover, of &longs;ubtle &longs;lates and plates of all &longs;orts of Stone and Mettall, apt by means of their Naturall Gravity, to move towards the Centre of the Earth, the which, neverthele&longs;s, be­ ing impotent, either through the Figure (as the Adver&longs;aries thinke) or through Levity, to break and penetrate the Continuity of the parts of the water, and to di&longs;tract its union, do continue to &longs;wimm without &longs;ubmerging in the lea&longs;t: nor on the other &longs;ide, &longs;hall the Authority of Ari&longs;totle move me, who in more than one place, a&longs;&longs;ir­ meth the contrary to this, which Experience &longs;hews me.

No Solid of &longs;uch Levity, nor of &longs;uch Figure, but that it doth penetrate the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the Water.

I return, therefore, to a&longs;&longs;ert, that there is not any Solid of &longs;uch Levity, nor of &longs;uch Figure, that being put upon the water, doth not divide and penetrate its Cra&longs;&longs;itude: yea if any with a more per­ &longs;picatious eye, &longs;hall return to ob&longs;erve more exactly the thin Boards of Wood, he &longs;hall &longs;ee them to be with part of their thickne&longs;s under

water, and not only with their inferiour Superficies, to ki&longs;&longs;e the Superiour of the water, as they of nece&longs;&longs;ity mu&longs;t have believed, who have &longs;aid, that &longs;uch Boards &longs;ubmerge not, as not being able to di­ vide the Tenacity of the parts of the water: and, moreover, he &longs;hall &longs;ee, that &longs;ubtle &longs;hivers of Ebony, Stone or Metall, when they float, have not only broak the Continuity of the water, but are with all their thickne&longs;s, under the Surface of it; and more and more, according as the Matters are more grave: &longs;o that a thin Plate of Lead, &longs;hall be lower than the Surface of the circumfu&longs;ed water, by at lea&longs;t twelve times the thickne&longs;s of the Plate, and Gold &longs;hall dive below the Levell of the water, almo&longs;t twenty times the thickne&longs;s of the Plate, as I &longs;hall anon declare.

Bodies of all Figures, laid up­ on the water, do penetrate its Cra&longs;&longs;itude, and in what propor­ tion.

But let us proceed to evince, that the water yields and &longs;ufters it &longs;elf to be penetrated by every the lighte&longs;t Body; and therewithall demon&longs;trate, how, even by Matters that &longs;ubmerge not, we may come to know that Figure operates nothing about the going or not going to the Bottom, &longs;eeing that the water &longs;uffers it &longs;elf to be penetrated equally by every Figure.

Make a Cone, or a Piramis of Cypre&longs;s, of Firre, or of other Wood of like Gravity, or of pure Wax, and let its height be &longs;ome­ what great, namely a handfull, or more, and put it into the water with the Ba&longs;e downwards: fir&longs;t, you &longs;hall &longs;ee that it will penetrate the water, nor &longs;hall it be at all impeded by the largene&longs;s of the Ba&longs;e, nor yet &longs;hall it &longs;ink all under water, but the part towards the point &longs;hall lye above it: by which &longs;hall be manife&longs;t, fir&longs;t, that that Solid forbeares not to &longs;ink out of an inabillity to divide the Continuity of the water, having already divided it with its broad part, that in the opinion of the Adver&longs;aries is the le&longs;s apt to make the divi&longs;ion. The Piramid being thus fixed, note what part of it &longs;hall be &longs;ub­ merged, and revert it afterwards with the point downwards, and you &longs;hall &longs;ee that it &longs;hall not dive into the water more than before, but if you ob&longs;erve how far it &longs;hall &longs;ink, every per&longs;on expert in Geometry, may mea&longs;ure, that tho&longs;e parts that remain out of the water, both in the one and in the other Experiment are equall to an hair: whence he may manife&longs;tly conclude, that the acute Figure which &longs;eemed mo&longs;t apt to part and penetrate the water, doth not part or penetrate it more than the large and &longs;pacious.

The Experi­ ment of a Cone, demitted with its Ba&longs;e, and af­ ter with its Point down­ wards.

And he that would have a more ea&longs;ie Experiment, let him take two Cylinders of the &longs;ame Matter, one long and &longs;mall, and the o­ ther &longs;hert, but very broad, and let him put them in the water, not di&longs;tended, but erect and endways: he &longs;hall &longs;ee, if he diligently mea&longs;ure the parts of the one and of the other, that in each of them the part &longs;ubmerged, retains exactly the &longs;ame proportion to that out of the water, and that no greater part is &longs;ubmerged of that long and &longs;mall one, than of the other more &longs;pacious and broad: howbeit, this re&longs;ts upon a very large, and that upon a very little Superficies of water: therefore the diver&longs;ity of Figure, occa&longs;ioneth neither facility, nor difficulty, in parting and penetrating the Con­ tinuity of the water; and, con&longs;equently, cannot be the Cau&longs;e of the Natation or Submer&longs;ion. He may likewi&longs;e di&longs;cover the non­ operating of variety of Figures, in ari&longs;ing from the Bottom of the water, towards the Surface, by taking Wax, and tempering it with a competent quantity of the filings of Lead, &longs;o that it may become a con&longs;iderable matter graver than the water: then let him make it into a Ball, and thru&longs;t it unto the Bottom of the water; and fa&longs;ten to it as much Cork, or other light matter, as ju&longs;t &longs;erveth to rai&longs;e it, and draw it towards the Surface: for afterwards changing the &longs;ame Wax into a thin Cake, or into any other Figure, that &longs;ame Cork &longs;hall rai&longs;e it in the &longs;ame manner to a hair.

This &longs;ilenceth not my Antagoni&longs;ts, but they &longs;ay, that all the di&longs;cour&longs;e hitherto made by me little importeth to them, and that it &longs;erves their turn, that they have demon&longs;trated in one only parti­ cular, and in what matter, and under what Figure plea&longs;eth them, namely, in a Board and in a Ball of Ebony, that this put in the water, de&longs;cends to the Bottom, and that &longs;tays atop to &longs;wim: and the Matter being the &longs;ame, and the two Bodies differing in no­ thing but in Figure, they affirm, that they have with all per&longs;picuity demon&longs;trated and &longs;en&longs;ibly manife&longs;ted what they undertook; and la&longs;tly, that they have obtained their intent. Neverthele&longs;s, I believe, and thinke, I can demon&longs;trate, that that &longs;ame Experiment proveth nothing again&longs;t my Conclu&longs;ion.

And fir&longs;t, it is fal&longs;e, that the Ball de&longs;cends, and the Board not: for the Board &longs;hall al&longs;o de&longs;cend, if you do to both the Figures, as the words of our Que&longs;tion requireth; that is, if you put them both into the water.

In Experi­ ments of Nata­ tion, the Solid is to be put into, not upon the water.

The Que&longs;tion of Natation &longs;ta­ ted.

The words were the&longs;e. That the Antagoni&longs;ts having an opinion, that the Figure would alter the Solid Bodies, in relation to the de&longs;cending or not de&longs;cending, a&longs;cending or not a&longs;cending in the &longs;ame Medium, as v. gr. in the &longs;ame water, in &longs;uch &longs;ort, that, for Example, a Solid that being of a Sphericall Figure, &longs;hall de&longs;cend to the Bottom, being reduced into &longs;ome other Figure, &longs;hall not de&longs;cend: I holding the contrary, do affirm, that a Corporeall Solid Body, which reduced into a Sphericall Fi­ gure, or any other, &longs;hall go to the Bottom, &longs;hall do the like under what&longs;oever other Figure, &c.

But to be in the water, implies to be placed in the water, and by

Ari&longs;totles own Definition of place, to be placed, importeth to be in­ vironed by the Superficies of the Ambient Body, therefore, then &longs;hall the two Figures be in the water, when the Superficies of the water, &longs;hall imbrace and inviron them: but when the Adver&longs;aries &longs;hew the Board of Ebony not de&longs;cending to the Bottom, they put it not into the water, but upon the water, where being by a certain im­ pediment (as by and by we will &longs;hew) retained, it is invironed, part by water, and part by air, which thing is contrary to our agreement, that was, that the Bodies &longs;hould be in the water, and not part in water, and part in air.

Place defined according to Ari&longs;totle.

The which is again made manifest, by the que&longs;tions being put as well about the things which go to the Bottom, as tho&longs;e which ari&longs;e from the Bottom to &longs;wimme, and who &longs;ees not that things placed in the Bottom, mu&longs;t have water about them.

It is now to be noted, that the Board of Ebany and the Ball, put into the water, both &longs;ink, but the Ball more &longs;wiftly, and the Board more &longs;lowly; and &longs;lower and &longs;lower, according as it &longs;hall be more broad and thin, and of this Tardity the breadth of the Figure is the true Cau&longs;e: But the&longs;e broad Boards that &longs;lowly de&longs;cend, are the &longs;ame, that being put lightly upon the water, do &longs;wimm: Therefore, if that were true which the Adver&longs;aries affirm, the &longs;ame numerical Figure, would in the &longs;ame numericall water, cau&longs;e one while Re&longs;t, and another while Tardity of Motion, which is impo&longs;&longs;ible: for every per­ ticular Figure which de&longs;cends to the Bottom, hath of nece&longs;&longs;ity its own determinate Tardity and &longs;lowne&longs;s, proper and naturall unto it, accor­ ding to which it moveth, &longs;o that every other Tardity, greater or le&longs;&longs;er is improper to its nature: if, therefore, a Board, as &longs;uppo&longs;e of a foot &longs;quare, de&longs;cendeth naturally with &longs;ix degrees of Tardity, it is impo&longs;&longs;i­ ble, that it &longs;hould de&longs;cend with ten or twenty, unle&longs;s &longs;ome new impe­ diment do arre&longs;t it. Much le&longs;s can it, by rea&longs;on of the &longs;ame Figure re&longs;t, and wholly cea&longs;e to move; but it is nece&longs;&longs;ary, that when ever it re&longs;teth, there do &longs;ome greater impediment intervene than the breadth of the Figure. Therefore, it mu&longs;t be &longs;omewhat el&longs;e, and not the Fi­ gure, that &longs;tayeth the Board of Ebany above water, of which Eigure the only Effect is the retardment of the Motion, according to which it de&longs;cendeth more &longs;lowly than the Ball. Let it be confe&longs;&longs;ed, there­ fore, rationally di&longs;cour&longs;ing, that the true and &longs;ole Cau&longs;e of the Ebanys going to the Bottom, is the exce&longs;s of its Gravity above the Gravity of the water: and the Cau&longs;e of the greater or le&longs;s Tardity, the breadth of this Figure, or the contractedne&longs;s of that: but of its Re&longs;t, it can by no means be allowed, that the quallity of the Figure, is the Cau&longs;e thereof: a&longs;well, becau&longs;e, making the Tardity greater, according as the Figure more dilateth, there cannot be &longs;o immen&longs;e a Dilatation, to which there may not be found a corre&longs;pondent immence Tardity. without redu&longs;ing it to Nullity of Motion; as, becau&longs;e the Figures produced by the Antagoni&longs;ts for effecters of Re&longs;t, are the &longs;elf &longs;ame that do al&longs;o go to the Bottom.

The con&longs;utati­ on of the Expe­ riment in the Ebany.

Every perticular Figure hath its own peculiat Tardity.

* The Figure & Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Medium a­ gain&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, have nothing to do with the Ef­ fect of Natation or Submer&longs;ion, by an Experi­ ment in Wall­ nut tree,

I will not omit another rea&longs;on, founded al&longs;o upon Experience, and if I deceive not my &longs;elf, manife&longs;tly concluding, how that the Intro­ ducton of the breadth or amplitude of Figure, and the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the water again&longs;t penetration, have nothing to do in the Effect of de­ &longs;cending, or a&longs;cending, or re&longs;ting in the water. ^{*}Take a piece of wood or other Matter, of which a Ball a&longs;cends from the Bottom of the water to the Surface, more &longs;lowly than a Ball of Ebony of the &longs;ame bigne&longs;&longs;e, &longs;o that it is manife&longs;t, that the Ball of Ebony more readily divideth the water in de&longs;cending, than the other in a&longs;cending; as for Example, let the Wood be Walnut-tree. Then take a Board of Walnut-tree, like and equall to that of Ebony of the Antagoni&longs;ts, which &longs;wims; and if it be true, that this floats above water, by rea&longs;on of the Figure, unable through its breadth, to pierce the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the &longs;ame, the other of Wallnut-tree, without all que&longs;tion, being thru&longs;t unto the Bottom, will &longs;tay there, as le&longs;s apt, through the &longs;ame impediment of Figure, to di­ vide the &longs;aid Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the water. But if we &longs;hall find, and by experience &longs;ee, that not only the thin Board, but every other Figure of the &longs;ame Wallnut-tree will return to float, as undoubtedly we &longs;hall, then I mu&longs;t de&longs;ier my oppo&longs;ers to forbear to attribute the floating of the Ebony, unto the Figure of the Board, in regard that the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the water is the &longs;ame, as well to the a&longs;cent, as to the de&longs;cent, and the force of the Wallnut-trees a&longs;cen&longs;ion, is le&longs;&longs;e than the Ebonys force in going to the Bottom.

Nay, I will &longs;ay more, that if we &longs;hall con&longs;ider Gold in compari&longs;on of water, we &longs;hall find, that it exceeds it in Gravity almo&longs;t twenty times, &longs;o that the Force and Impetus, wherewith a Ball of Gold goes to the Bottom, is very great. On the contrary, there want not matters, as Virgins Wax, and &longs;ome Woods, which are not above a fiftieth part le&longs;s grave than water, whereupon their A&longs;cen&longs;ion therein is very &longs;low, and a thou&longs;and times weaker than the Impetus of the Golds de&longs;cent: yet notwith&longs;tanding, a plate of Gold &longs;wims without de&longs;cending to the Bottom, and, on the contrary, we cannot make a Cake of Wax, or thin Board of Wood, which put in the Bottom of the Water, &longs;hall re&longs;t there without a&longs;cending. Now if the Figure can ob&longs;truct the Penetration, and impede the de&longs;cent of Gold, that hath &longs;o great an Impetus, how can it choo&longs;e but &longs;uffice to re&longs;i&longs;t the &longs;ame Penetration of the other mat­ ter in a&longs;cending, when as it hath &longs;carce a thou&longs;andth part of the Impetus that the Gold hath in de&longs;cending? Its therefore, nece&longs;&longs;ary, that that which &longs;u&longs;pends the thin Plate of Gold, or Board of Ebony, upon the water, be &longs;ome thing that is wanting to the other Cakes and Boards of Matters le&longs;s grave than the water; &longs;ince that being put to the Bottom, and left at liberty, they ri&longs;e up to the Surface, without any ob&longs;truction: But they want not for flatne&longs;s and breadth of Figure: Therefore, the &longs;paciou&longs;ne&longs;&longs;e of the Figure, is not that which makes the Gold and Ebony to &longs;wim.

An Experi­ ment in Gold, to prove the non­ operating of Fi­ gure in Natation and Submer&longs;ion.

And, becau&longs;e, that the exce&longs;s of their Gravity above the Gravity of the water, is que&longs;tionle&longs;s the Cau&longs;e of the &longs;inking of the flat piece of Ebony, and the thin Plate of Gold, when they go to the Bottom, there­ fore, of nece&longs;&longs;ity, when they float, the Cau&longs;e of their &longs;taying above water, proceeds from Levity, which in that ca&longs;e, by &longs;ome Accident, peradventure not hitherto ob&longs;erved, cometh to meet with the &longs;aid Board, rendering it no longer as it was before, whil&longs;t it did fink more ponderous than the water, but le&longs;s.

Now, let us return to take the thin Plate of Gold, or of Silver, or the thin Board of Ebony, and let us lay it lightly upon the water, &longs;o that it &longs;tay there without &longs;inking, and diligently ob&longs;erve its effect. And fir&longs;t, &longs;ee how fal&longs;e the a&longs;&longs;ertion of Aristotle, and our oponents is, to wit, that it &longs;tayeth above water, through its unability to pierce and pene­ trate the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the waters Cra&longs;&longs;itude: for it will manife&longs;tly appear, not only that the &longs;aid Plates have penetrated the water, but al&longs;o that they are a con&longs;iderable matter lower than the Surface of the &longs;ame, the which continueth eminent, and maketh as it were a Rampert on all &longs;ides, round about the &longs;aid Plates, the profundity of which they &longs;tay &longs;wimming: and, according as the &longs;aid Plates &longs;hall be more grave than the water, two, four, ten or twenty times, it is nece&longs;&longs;ary, that their Superficies do &longs;tay below the univer&longs;all Surface of the water, &longs;o much more, than the thickne&longs;s of tho&longs;e Plates, as we &longs;hal more di&longs;tinctly &longs;hew anon. In the mean &longs;pace, for the more ea&longs;ie under&longs;tanding of what I &longs;ay, ob&longs;erve with me a little the pre&longs;ent

Scheme: in which let us &longs;uppo&longs;e the Surface of the water to be di&longs;tended, according to the Lines F L D B, upon which if one &longs;hall put a board of matter &longs;pecifically more grave than water, but &longs;o lightly that it &longs;ubmetge not, it &longs;hall not re&longs;t any thing above, but &longs;hall enter with its whole thickne&longs;s into the water: and, moreover, &longs;hall &longs;ink al&longs;o, as we &longs;ee by the Board A I, O I, who&longs;e breadth is wholly &longs;unk into the water, the little Ram­ perts of water L A and D O incompa&longs;&longs;ing it, who&longs;e Superficies is no­ tably higher than the Superficies of the Board. See now whether it be true, that the &longs;aid Board goes not to the Bottom, as being of Figure unapt to penetrate the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water.

But, if it hath already penetrated, and overcome the Continuity of the water, & is of its own nature more grave than the &longs;aid water, why doth it not proceed in its &longs;inking, but &longs;top and &longs;u&longs;pend its &longs;elf within that little dimple or cavitie, which with its pondero&longs;ity it hath made in the water? I an&longs;wer; becau&longs;e that in &longs;ubmerging it &longs;elf, &longs;o far as till its Superficies come to the Levell with that of the water, it lo&longs;eth a part of its Gravity, and lo&longs;eth the re&longs;t of it as it &longs;ubmergeth & de&longs;cends be­ neath the Surface of the water, which maketh Ramperts and Banks round about it, and it &longs;u&longs;taines this lo&longs;s by means of its drawing after it, and carrying along with it, the Air that is above it, and by Contact ad­ herent to it, which Air &longs;ucceeds to fill the Cavity that is invironed by the Ramperts of water: &longs;o that that which in this ca&longs;e de&longs;cends and is placed in the water, is not only the Board of Ebony or Plate of Iron, but a compo&longs;ition of Ebony and Air, from which re&longs;ulteth a Solid no longer &longs;uperiour in Gravity to the water, as was the &longs;imple Ebony, or the &longs;imple Gold. And, if we exactly con&longs;ider, what, and how great the Solid is, that in this Experiment enters into the water, and contra&longs;ts with the Gravity of the &longs;ame, it will be found to be all that which we find to be beneath the Surface of the water, the which is an aggregate and Compound of a Board of Ebony, and of almo&longs;t the like quantity of Air, or a Ma&longs;s compounded of a Plate of Lead, and ten or twelve times as much Air. But, Genrlemen, you that are my Antagoni&longs;ts in our Que&longs;tion, we require the Identity of Matter, and the alteration only of the Figure; therefore, you mu&longs;t remove that Air, which being conjoyned with the Board, makes it become another Body le&longs;s grave than the Water, and put only the Ebony into the Water, and you &longs;hall certainly &longs;ee the Board de&longs;cend to the Bottom; and, if that do not happen, you have got the day. And to &longs;eperate the Air from the Ebony, there needs no more but only to bath the Superficies of the &longs;aid Board with the &longs;ame Water: for the Water being thus interpo&longs;ed between the Board and the Air, the other circumfu&longs;ed Water &longs;hall run together without any impedi­ ment, and &longs;hall receive into it the &longs;ole and bare Ebony, as it was to do.

Why &longs;olids having penitra­ ted the Water, do not proceed to a totail Sub­ mer&longs;ion.

How to &longs;epe­ rate the Air from Solids in demit­ ting them into the water.

But, me thinks I hear &longs;ome of the Adver&longs;aries cunningly oppo&longs;ing this, and telling me, that they will not yield, by any means, that their Board be wetted, becau&longs;e the weight added thereto by the Water, by making it heavier than it was before, draws it to the Bottom, and that the addition of new weight is contrary to our a­ greement, which was, that the Matter be the &longs;ame.

To this, I an&longs;wer, fir&longs;t; that treating of the operation of Figure in Bodies put into the Water, none can &longs;uppo&longs;e them to be put into the Water without being wet; nor do I de&longs;ire more to be done to the Board, then I will give you leave to do to the Ball. Moreover, it is untrue, that the Board &longs;inks by vertue of the new Weight added to it by the Water, in the &longs;ingle and &longs;light bathing of it: for I will put ten or twenty drops of Water upon the &longs;ame Board, whil&longs;t it is &longs;u&longs;tained upon the water, which drops, becau&longs;e not conjoyned with the other Water circumfu&longs;ed, &longs;hall not &longs;o encrea&longs;e the weight of it, as to make it &longs;ink: but if the Board being taken out, and all the water wiped off that was added thereto, I &longs;hould bath all its Superficies with one only very &longs;mall drop, and put it again upon the water, with­ out doubt it &longs;hall &longs;ink, the other Water running to cover it, not be­ ing retained by the &longs;uperiour Air; which Air by the interpo&longs;ition of the thin vail of water, that takes away its Contiguity unto the Ebony, &longs;hall without Renitence be &longs;eperated, nor doth it in the lea&longs;t oppo&longs;e the &longs;ucce&longs;&longs;ion of the other Water: but rather, to &longs;peak better, it &longs;hall de&longs;cend freely; becau&longs;e it &longs;hall be all invironed and covered with water, as &longs;oon as its &longs;uperiour Superficies, before vailed with water, doth arrive to the Levell of the univer&longs;all Surface of the &longs;aid water. To &longs;ay, in the next place, that water can encrea&longs;e the weight of things that are demitted into it, is mo&longs;t fal&longs;e, for water hath no Gravity in water, &longs;ince it de&longs;cends not: yea, if we would well con&longs;i­ der what any immen&longs;e Ma&longs;s of water doth put upon a grave Body; that is placed in it, we &longs;hall find experimentally, that it, on the con­ trary, will rather in a great part demini&longs;h the weight of it, and that we may be able to lift an huge Stone from the Bottom of the water, which the water being removed, we are not able to &longs;tir. Nor let them tell me by way of reply, that although the &longs;uperpo&longs;ed water augment not the Gravity of things that are in it, yet it increa&longs;eth the pondero&longs;ity of tho&longs;e that &longs;wim, and are part in the water and part in the Air, as is &longs;een, for Example, in a Bra&longs;s Ketle, which whil&longs;t it is empty of water, and repleni&longs;hed only with Air &longs;hall &longs;wim, but pouring of Water therein, it &longs;hall become &longs;o grave, that it &longs;hall &longs;ink to the Bottom, and that by rea&longs;on of the new weight added thereto. To this I will return an&longs;wer, as above, that the Gravity of the Water, contained in the Ve&longs;&longs;el is not that which &longs;inks it to the Bot­ tom, but the proper Gravity of the Bra&longs;s, &longs;uperiour to the Specificall Gravity of the Water: for if the Ve&longs;&longs;el were le&longs;s grave than water, the Ocean would not &longs;uffice to &longs;ubmerge it. And, give me leave to repeat it again, as the fundamentall and principall point in this Ca&longs;e, that the Air contained in this Ve&longs;&longs;el before the infu&longs;ion of the Water, was that which kept it a-float, &longs;ince that there was made of it, and of the Bra&longs;s, a Compo&longs;ition le&longs;s grave than an equall quanti­ ty of Water: and the place that the Ve&longs;&longs;el occupyeth in the Water whil&longs;t it floats, is not equall to the Bra&longs;s alone, but to the Bra&longs;s and to the Air together, which filleth that part of the Ve&longs;&longs;el that is below the Levell of the water: Moreover, when the Water is infu&longs;ed, the Air is removed, and there is a compo&longs;ition made of Bra&longs;s and of water, more grave in &longs;pecie than the &longs;imple water, but not by vertue of the water infu&longs;ed, as having greater Specifick Gravity than the other water, but through the proper Gravity of the Bra&longs;s, and through the alienation of the Air. Now, as he that &longs;hould &longs;ay that Bra&longs;s, that by its nature goes to the Bottom, being formed into the Figure of a Ketle, acquireth from that Figure a vertue of lying in the Water without &longs;inking, would &longs;ay that which is fal&longs;e; becau&longs;e that Bra&longs;s fa&longs;hioned into any whatever Figure, goeth always to the Bottom, provided, that that which is put into the water be &longs;imple Bra&longs;s; and it is not the Figure of the Ve&longs;&longs;el that makes the Bra&longs;s to float, but it is becau&longs;e that that is not purely Bra&longs;s which is put into the water, but an aggregate of Bra&longs;s and of Air: &longs;o is it neither more nor le&longs;s fal&longs;e, that a thin Plate of Bra&longs;s or of Ebony, &longs;wims by vertue of its dilated & broad Figure: for the truth is, that it bares up without &longs;ubmerging, becau&longs;e that that which is put in the water, is not pure Bra&longs;s or &longs;imple Ebony, but an ag­ gregate of Bra&longs;s and Air, or of Ebony and Air. And, this is not contrary unto my Conclu&longs;ion, the which, (having many a time &longs;een Ve&longs;&longs;els of Mettall, and thin pieces of diver&longs;e grave Matters float, by vertue of the Air conjoyned with them) did affirm, That Figure was not the Cau&longs;e of the Natation or Submer&longs;ion of &longs;uch Solids as were placed in the water. Nay more, I cannot omit, but mu&longs;t tell my Antagoni&longs;ts, that this new conceit of denying that the Superfi­ cies of the Board &longs;hould be bathed, may beget in a third per&longs;on an opinion of a poverty of Arguments of defence on their part, &longs;ince that &longs;uch bathing was never in&longs;i&longs;ted upon by them in the beginning of our Di&longs;pute, and was not que&longs;tioned in the lea&longs;t, being that the Originall of the di&longs;cour&longs;e aro&longs;e upon the &longs;wiming of Flakes of Ice, wherein it would be &longs;implicity to require that their Superficies might bedry: be&longs;ides, that whether the&longs;e pieces of Ice be wet or dry they alwayes &longs;wim, and as the Adver&longs;aries &longs;ay, by rea&longs;on of the Figure.

Water hath no Gravity in Water.

Water de­ mini&longs;heth the Gravity of So­ lids immerged therein.

The Experi­ ment of a Bra&longs;s Ketle &longs;wiming when empty, & &longs;inking when full, alledged to prove that water gravitates in water, an&longs;wered.

An Ocean &longs;uf­ ficeth not to &longs;ink a Ve&longs;&longs;el &longs;pe­ cifically le&longs;s grave than wa­ ter.

Air, the Cau&longs;e of the Natation of empty Ve&longs;&longs;els of Matters gra­ ver in &longs;pecie than the water.

Neither Figure, nor the breadth of Figure, is the Cau&longs;e of Nata­ tion.

Some peradventure, by way of defence, may &longs;ay, that wetting the Board of Ebony, and that in the &longs;uperiour Superficies, it would, though of it &longs;elf unable to pierce and penetrate the water, be born downwards, if not by the weight of the additionall water, at lea&longs;t by that de&longs;ire and propen&longs;ion that the &longs;uperiour parts of the water have to re-unite and rejoyn them&longs;elves: by the Motion of which parts, the &longs;aid Board cometh in a certain manner, to be depre&longs;&longs;ed downwards.

The Bathed Solid de&longs;cends not out of any affectation of u­ nion in the upper parts of the wa­ ter.

This weak Refuge will be removed, if we do but con&longs;ider, that the repugnancy of the inferiour parts of the water, is as great against Di&longs;-union, as the Inclination of its &longs;uperiour parts is to union: nor can the uper unite them&longs;elves without depre&longs;&longs;ing the board, nor can it de&longs;cend without di&longs;uniting the parts of the nether Water: &longs;o that it doth follow, by nece&longs;&longs;ary con&longs;equence, that for tho&longs;e re&longs;pects, it &longs;hall not de&longs;cend. Moreover, the &longs;ame that may be &longs;aid of the upper parts of the water, may with equall rea&longs;on be &longs;aid of the nethe, namely, that de&longs;iring to unite, they &longs;hall force the &longs;aid Board upwards.

Happily, &longs;ome of the&longs;e Gentlemen that di&longs;&longs;ent from me, will won­ der, that I affirm, that the contiguous &longs;uperiour Air is able to &longs;u&longs;tain that Plate of Bra&longs;s or of Silver, that &longs;tayeth above water; as if I would in a certain &longs;ence allow the Air, a kind of Magnetick vertue of &longs;u&longs;taining the grave Bodies, with which it is contiguous. To &longs;a­ tis&longs;ie all I may, to all doubts, I have been con&longs;idering how by &longs;ome other &longs;en&longs;ible Experiment I might demon&longs;trate, how truly that little contiguous and &longs;uperiour Air &longs;u&longs;taines tho&longs;e Solids, which being by nature apt to de&longs;cend to the Bottom, being placed lightly on the water &longs;ubmerge not, unle&longs;s they be fir&longs;t thorowly bathed; and have found, that one of the&longs;e Bodies having de&longs;cended to the Bottom, by conveigh­ ing to it (without touching it in the lea&longs;t) a little Air, which conjoyneth with the top of the &longs;ame; it becometh &longs;ufficient, not only, as before to &longs;u&longs;tain it, but al&longs;o to rai&longs;e it, and to carry it back to the top, where it &longs;tays and abideth in the &longs;ame manner, till &longs;uch time, as the a&longs;&longs;i&longs;tance of the conjoyned Air is taken away. And to this effect, I have taken a Ball of Wax, and made it with a little Lead, &longs;o grave, that it lea&longs;urely de&longs;cends to the Bottom, making with all its Superficies very &longs;mooth and pollite: and this being put gently into the water, almo&longs;t wholly &longs;ub­ mergeth, there remaining vi&longs;&longs;ible only a little of the very top, the which solong as it is conjoyned with the Air, &longs;hall retain the Ball a-top, but the Contiguity of the Air taken away by wetting it, it &longs;hall de&longs;cend to the Bottom and there remain. Now to make it by vertue of the Air, that before &longs;u&longs;tained it to return again to the top, and &longs;tay there, thru&longs;t into the water a Gla&longs;s rever&longs;ed with the mouth downwards, the which &longs;hall carry with it the Air it contains, and move this towards the Ball, aba&longs;ing it till &longs;uch time that you &longs;ee, by the tran&longs;parency of the Gla&longs;s, that the contained Air do arrive to the &longs;ummity of the Ball: then gently with­ draw the Gla&longs;s upwards, and you &longs;hall &longs;ee the Ball to ri&longs;e, and afterwards stay on the top of the water, if you carefully part the Gla&longs;s and the water without overmuch commoving and di&longs;turbing it. There is, therefore, a certain affinity between the Air and other Bodies, which holds them uni­ ed, &longs;o, that they &longs;eperate not without a kind of violence. The &longs;ame likewi&longs;e is &longs;een in the water; for if we &longs;hall wholly &longs;ubmerge &longs;ome Body in it, &longs;o that it be thorowly bathed, in the drawing of it afterwards gent­ ly out again, we &longs;hall &longs;ee the water follow it, and ri&longs;e notably above its Surface, before it &longs;eperates from it. Solid Bodies, al&longs;o, if they be equall and alike in Superficies, &longs;o, that they make an exact Contact without the interpo&longs;ition of the lea&longs;t Air, that may part them in the &longs;eperation and yield untill that the ambient Medium &longs;ucceeds to repleni&longs;h the place, do hold very firmly conjoyned, and are not to be &longs;eperated without great force but, becau&longs;e, the Air, Water, and other Liquids, very expedi­ tiou&longs;ly &longs;hape them&longs;elves to contact with any Solid Bodies, &longs;o that their Superficies do exqui&longs;itely adopt them&longs;elves to that of the Solids, without any thing remaining between them, therefore, the effect of this Con­ junction and Adherence is more manife&longs;tly and frequently ob&longs;erved in them, than in hard and inflexible Bodies, who&longs;e Superficies do very rate­ ly conjoyn with exactne&longs;s of Contact. This is therefore that Magne­ tick vertue, which with firm Connection conjoyneth all Bodies, that do touch without the interpo&longs;ition of flexible fluids; and, who knows, but that that a Contact, when it is very exact, may be a &longs;ufficient Cau&longs;e of the Union and Continuity of the parts of a naturall Body?

A Magneti&longs;me in the Air, by which it bears up tho&longs;e Solids in the wa­ ter, that are con­ tiguous with it.

The Effect of the Airs Conti­ guity in the Na­ tation of Solids.

The force of Contact.

An affectati­ on of Conjunct­ ion betwixt So­ lids and the Air contiguous to them.

The like affect­ ation of Con­ junction be­ twixt Solids & the water.

Al&longs;o the like affectation and Conjunction be­ twixt Solids them&longs;eives.

Contact may be the Cau&longs;e of the Continuity of Naturall Bo­ dies.

Now, pur&longs;uing my purpo&longs;e, I &longs;ay; that it needs not, that we have recour&longs;e to the Tenacity, that the parts of the water have among&longs;t them­ &longs;elves, by which they re&longs;i&longs;t and oppo&longs;e Divi&longs;ion, Di&longs;traction, and Seper­ ration, becau&longs;e there is no &longs;uch Coherence and Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion for if there were, it would be no le&longs;s in the internall parts than in tho&longs;e nearer the &longs;uperiour or externall Surface, &longs;o that the &longs;ame Board, find­ ing alwayes the &longs;ame Re&longs;i&longs;tance and Renitence, would no le&longs;s &longs;top in the middle of the water than about the Surface, which is fal&longs;e. More­ over, what Re&longs;i&longs;tance can we place in the Continuity of the water if we &longs;ee that it is impo&longs;&longs;ible to &longs;ind any Body of what&longs;oever Matter Figure or Magnitude, which being put into the water, &longs;hall be ob&longs;tructed and impeded by the Tenacity of the parts of the water to one another &longs;o, but that it is moved upwards or downwards, according as the Cau&longs;e of their Motion tran&longs;ports it? And, what greater proof of it can we de­ &longs;ier, than that which we daily &longs;ee in Muddy waters, which being put into Ve&longs;&longs;els to be drunk, and being, after &longs;ome hours &longs;etling, &longs;till, as we &longs;ay thick in the end, after four or &longs;ix dayes they are wholly &longs;etled, and be­ come pure and clear? Nor can their Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Penetration &longs;tay tho&longs;e impalpable and in&longs;en&longs;ible Atomes of Sand, which by rea&longs;on of their exceeding &longs;mall force, &longs;pend &longs;ix dayes in de&longs;cending the &longs;pace of half a yard.

The &longs;ettlement of Muddy Wa­ ter, proveth that that Element hath no aver&longs;i­ on to Divi&longs;ion.

Nor let them &longs;ay, that the &longs;eeing of &longs;uch &longs;mall Bodies, con&longs;ume &longs;ix dayes in de&longs;cending &longs;o little a way, is a &longs;ufficient Argument of the Waters Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion; becau&longs;e that is no re&longs;i&longs;ting of Divi&longs;ion, but a retarding of Motion; and it would be &longs;implicity to &longs;ay, that a thing oppo&longs;eth Divi&longs;ion and that in the &longs;ame in&longs;tant, it permits it &longs;elf to be divided: nor doth the Retardation of Motion at all favour the Adver&longs;aries cau&longs;e, for that they are to in&longs;tance in a thing that wholly prohibiteth Motion, and procureth Re&longs;t; it is nece&longs;&longs;ary, therefore, to find out Bodies that &longs;tay in the water, if one would &longs;hew its repugnancy to Divi&longs;ion, and not &longs;uch as move in it, howbeit &longs;lowly.

Water cannot oppo&longs;e divi&longs;ion, and at the &longs;ame time permit it &longs;elf to be divi­ ded.

What then is this Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water, with which it re&longs;i&longs;teth Di­ vi&longs;ion? What, I be&longs;eech you, &longs;hould it be, if we (as we have &longs;aid above) with all diligence attempting the reduction of a Matter into &longs;o like a Gravity with the water, that forming it into a dilated Plate it re&longs;ts &longs;u&longs;­ pended as we have &longs;aid, between the two waters, it be impo&longs;&longs;ible to effect it, though we bring them to &longs;uch an Equiponderance, that as much Lead as the fourth part of a Grain of Mu&longs;terd-&longs;eed, added to the &longs;ame expanded Plate, that in Air [i. e. out of the water] &longs;hall weigh four or fix pounds, &longs;inketh it to the Bottom, and being &longs;ub&longs;tracted, it a&longs;cends to the Surface of the water? I cannot &longs;ee, (if what I &longs;ay be true, as it is mo&longs;t certain) what minute vertue and force we can po&longs;&longs;ibly find or ima­ gine, to which the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the water again&longs;t Divi&longs;ion and Penetra­ tion is not inferiour; whereupon, we mu&longs;t of nece&longs;&longs;ity conclude that it is nothing: becan&longs;e, if it were of any &longs;en&longs;ible power, &longs;ome large Plate might be found or compounded of a Matter alike in Gra­ vity to the water, which not only would &longs;tay between the two wa­ ters; but, moreover, &longs;hould not be able to de&longs;cend or a&longs;cend with­ out notable force. We may likewi&longs;e collect the &longs;ame from an o­ ther Experiment, &longs;hewing that the Water gives way al&longs;o in the &longs;ame manner to tran&longs;ver&longs;all Divi&longs;ion; for if in a &longs;etled and &longs;tanding water we &longs;hould place any great Ma&longs;s that goeth not to the bottom, draw­ ing it with a &longs;ingle (Womans) Hair, we might carry it from place to place without any oppo&longs;ition, and this whatever Figure it hath, though that it po&longs;&longs;e&longs;s a great &longs;pace of water, as for in&longs;tance, a great Beam would do moved &longs;ide-ways. Perhaps &longs;ome might oppo&longs;e me and &longs;ay, that if the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of water again&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, as I affirm, were nothing; Ships &longs;hould not need &longs;uch a force of Oars and Sayles for the moving of them from place to place in a tranquile Sea, or &longs;tanding Lake. To him that &longs;hould make &longs;uch an objection, I would reply, that the water contra&longs;teth not again&longs;t, nor &longs;imply re&longs;i&longs;teth Divi&longs;ion, but a &longs;udden Divi&longs;ion, and with &longs;o much greater Reni­ tence, by how much greater the Velocity is: and the Cau&longs;e of this Re&longs;i&longs;tance depends not on Cra&longs;&longs;itude, or any other thing that ab&longs;o­ lutely oppo&longs;eth Divi&longs;ion, but becau&longs;e that the parts of the water divided, in giving way to that Solid that is moved in it, are them­ &longs;elves al&longs;o nece&longs;&longs;itated locally to move, &longs;ome to the one &longs;ide, and &longs;ome to the other, and &longs;ome downwards: and this mu&longs;t no le&longs;s be done by the waves before the Ship, or other Body &longs;wimming through the water, than by the po&longs;teriour and &longs;ub&longs;equent; becau&longs;e, the Ship proceeding forwards, to make it &longs;elf a way to receive its Bulk, it is requi&longs;ite, that with the Prow it repul&longs;e the adjacent parts of the water, as well on one hand as on the other, and that it move them as much tran&longs;ver&longs;ly, as is the half of the breadth of the Hull: and the like removall mu&longs;t tho&longs;e waves make, that &longs;ucceeding the Poump do run from the remoter parts of the Ship towards tho&longs;e of the middle, &longs;ucce&longs;&longs;ively to repleni&longs;h the places, which the Ship in ad­ vancing forwards, goeth, leaving vacant. Now, becau&longs;e, all Moti­ tions are made in Time, and the longer in greater time: and it being moreover true, that tho&longs;e Bodies that in a certain time are moved by a certain power &longs;uch a certain &longs;pace, &longs;hall not be moved the &longs;ame &longs;pace, and in a &longs;horter Time, unle&longs;s by a greater Power: therefore, the broader Ships move &longs;lower than the narrower, being put on by an equall Force: and the &longs;ame Ve&longs;&longs;el requires &longs;o much greater force of Wind, or Oars, the fa&longs;ter it is to move.

An hair will draw a great Ma&longs;s thorow the Water; which proveth, that it hath no Re&longs;i&longs;t­ ance again&longs;t tran&longs;ver&longs;all Di­ vi&longs;ion.

How &longs;hips are moved in the water.

Bodies moved a certain &longs;pace in a certain Time, by a certain power, cannot be moved the &longs;ame &longs;pace, and in a &longs;horter time, but by a greater power.

But yet for all this, any great Ma&longs;s &longs;wimming in a &longs;tanding Lake, may be moved by any petit force; only it is true, that a le&longs;&longs;er force more &longs;lowly moves it: but if the waters Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion, were in any manner &longs;en&longs;ible, it would follow, that the &longs;aid Ma&longs;s, &longs;hould, notwith­ &longs;tanding the percu&longs;&longs;ion of &longs;ome &longs;en&longs;ible force, continue immoveable, which is not &longs;o. Yea, I will &longs;ay farther, that &longs;hould we retire our &longs;elves into the more internall contemplation of the Nature of water and other Fluids, perhaps we &longs;hould di&longs;cover the Con&longs;titution of their parts to be &longs;uch, that they not only do not oppo&longs;e Divi&longs;ion, but that they have not any thing in them to be divided: &longs;o that the Re&longs;i&longs;tance that is ob&longs;erved in moving through the water, is like to that which we meet with in pa&longs;&longs;ing through a great Throng of People, wherein we find impediment, and not by any difficulty in the Divi&longs;ion, for that none of tho&longs;e per&longs;ons are divided whereof the Croud is compo&longs;ed, but only in moving of tho&longs;e per&longs;ons &longs;ide­ ways which were before divided and disjoyned: and thus we find Re&longs;i&longs;tance in thru&longs;ting a Stick into an heap of Sand, not becau&longs;e any part of the Sand is to be cut in pieces, but only to be moved and rai&longs;ed. two manners of Penetration, therefore, offer them&longs;elves to us, one in Bodies, who&longs;e parts were continuall, and here Divi&longs;ion &longs;eemeth nece&longs;&longs;ary; the other in the aggregates of parts not continuall, but contiguous only, and here there is no nece&longs;&longs;ity of dividing but of moving only. Now, I am not well re&longs;olved, whether water and other Fluids may be e&longs;teemed to be of parts continuall or contiguous only; yet I find my &longs;elf indeed incli­ ned to think that they are rather contiguous (if there be in Naturno other manner of aggregating, than by the union, or by the touching of the extreams:) and I am induced thereto by the great difference that I &longs;ee > between the Conjunction of the parts of an hard or Solid Body, and the Conjunction of the &longs;ame parts when the &longs;ame Body &longs;hall be made Liquid and Fluid: for if, for example, I take a Ma&longs;s of Silver or other Solid and hard Mettall, I &longs;hall in dividing it into two parts, find not only the re&longs;i&longs;tance that is found in the moving of it only, but an other incomparably greater, dependent on that vertue, whatever it be, which holds the parts united: and &longs;o if we would divide again tho&longs;e two parts into other two and &longs;ucce&longs;&longs;ively into others and others, we &longs;hould &longs;till find a like Re&longs;i&longs;t­ ance, but ever le&longs;s by how much &longs;maller the parts to be divided &longs;hall be; but if, la&longs;tly, employing mo&longs;t &longs;ubtile and acute In&longs;truments, &longs;uch as are the mo&longs;t tenuous parts of the Fire, we &longs;hall re&longs;olve it (perhaps) into its la&longs;t and lea&longs;t Particles, there &longs;hall not be left in them any longer either Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion, or &longs;o much as a capacity of being farther divi­ ded, e&longs;pecially by In&longs;truments more gro&longs;&longs;e than the acuities of Fire: and what Knife or Ra&longs;or put into well melted Silver can we finde, that will divide a thing which &longs;urpa&longs;&longs;eth the &longs;eparating power of Fire? Certainly none: becau&longs;e either the whole &longs;hall be reduced to the mo&longs;t minute and ultimate Divi&longs;ions, or if there remain parts capable &longs;till of other Suddi­ divi&longs;ions, they cannot receive them, but only from acuter Divi&longs;ors than Fire; but a Stick or Rod of Iron, moved in the melted Met all, is not &longs;uch a one. Of a like Con&longs;titution and Con&longs;i&longs;tence, I account the parts of Water, and other Liquids to be, namely, incapable of Divi&longs;ion by rea&longs;on of their Temtity; or if not ab&longs;olutely indivi&longs;ible, yet at lea&longs;t not to be divided by a Board, or other Solid Body, palpable unto the band, the Sector being alwayes required to be more &longs;harp than the Solid to be cut. Solid Bodies, therefore, do only move, and not divide the Water, when put into it; who&longs;e parts being before divided to the ex­ treame&longs;t minuity, and therefore capable of being moved, either many of them at once, or few, or very few, they &longs;oon give place to every &longs;mall Cor­ pu&longs;cle, that de&longs;cends in the &longs;ame: for that, it being little and light, de­ &longs;cending in the Air, and arriving to the Surface of the Water, it meets with Particles of Water more &longs;mall, and of le&longs;s Re&longs;i&longs;tance again&longs;t Motion and Extru&longs;ion, than is its own prement and extru&longs;ive force, whereupon it &longs;ubmergeth, and moveth &longs;uch a portion of them, as is pro­ portionate to its Power. There is not, therefore, any Re&longs;i&longs;tance in Water again&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, nay, there is not in it any divi&longs;ible parts. I adde, moreover, that in ca&longs;e yet there &longs;bould be any &longs;mall Re&longs;i&longs;tance found (which is ab&longs;olutely fal&longs;e) haply in attempting with an Hair to move a very great natant Machine, or in e&longs;&longs;aying by the addition of one &longs;mall Grain of Lead to &longs;ink, or by removall of it to rai&longs;e a very broad Plate of Matter, equall in Gravity with Water, (which likewi&longs;e will not happen, in ca&longs;e we proceed with dexterity) we may ob&longs;erve that that Re&longs;i&longs;tance is a very different thing from that which the Adver&longs;aries pro­ duce for the Cau&longs;e of the Natation of the Plate of Lead or Board of Ebo­ ny, for that one may make a Board of Ebony, which being put upon the Water &longs;wimmeth, and cannot be &longs;ubmerged, no not by the addition of an bundred Grains of Lead put upon the &longs;ame, and afterwards being ba­ thed, not only &longs;inks, though the &longs;aid Lead be taken away, but though moreover a quantity of Cork, or of &longs;ome other light Body fa&longs;tened to it, &longs;ufficeth not to hinder it from &longs;inking unto the bottome: &longs;o that you &longs;ee, that although it were granted that there is a certain &longs;mall Re&longs;i&longs;t­ ance of Divi&longs;ion found in the &longs;ubstance of the Water, yet this hath no­ thing to do with that Cau&longs;e which &longs;upports the Board above the Water, with a Re&longs;i&longs;tance an hundred times greater than that which men can find in the parts of the Water: nor let them tell me, that only the Sur- face of the Water hath &longs;uch Re&longs;i&longs;tance, and not the internall parts, or that &longs;uch Re&longs;i&longs;tance is found greate&longs;t in the beginning of the Submer&longs;ion, as it al&longs;o &longs;eems that in the beginning, Motion meets with greater oppo&longs;iti­ on, than in the continuance of it; becau&longs;e, fir&longs;t, I will permit, that the Water be &longs;tirred, and that the &longs;uperiour parts be mingled with the mid­ dle, and inferiour parts, or that tho&longs;e above be wholly removed, and tho&longs;e in the middle only made u&longs;e off, and yet you &longs;hall &longs;ee the effect for all that, to be still the &longs;ame: Moreover, that Hair which draws a Beam through the Water, is likewi&longs;e to divide the upperparts, and is al&longs;o to begin the Motion, and yet it begins it, and yet it divides it: and finally, let the Board of Ebony be put in the midway, betwixt the bottome and the top of the Water, and let it there for a while be &longs;u&longs;pended and &longs;etled, and afterwards let it be left at liberty, and it will instantly begin its Motion, and will continue it unto the bottome. Nay, more, the Board &longs;o &longs;oon as it is dimitted upon the Water, hath not only begun to move and divide it, but is for a good &longs;pace dimerged into it.

The parts of Liquids, &longs;o farte from re&longs;i&longs;ting Divi&longs;ion, that they contain not any thing that may be divided.

The Re&longs;i&longs;t­ ance a Solid findeth in mo­ ving through the water, like to that we meet with in pa&longs;&longs;ing through a throng of peo­ ple;

Or in thru&longs;t­ ing a Stick into an heap of Sand.

Two kinds of Penetration, one in Bodies conti­ nuall, the other in Bodies only contiguous.

Water con&longs;i&longs;ts not of continu­ all, but only of contiguous parts.

Set what &longs;atis­ faction he hath given, as to this point, in Lib. de Motu. Dial. 2.

Great differ­ ence betwixt the Conjunction of the parts of a Bo­ dy when Solid, and when fluid.

Water con&longs;i&longs;ts of parts that ad­ mit of no fat­ ther divi&longs;ion.

Solids dimit­ ted into the wa­ ter, do onely move, and not divide it.

If there were any Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion in water, it mu&longs;t needs be &longs;mall, in that it is over­ come by an Hair, a Grain of Lead, or a &longs;light bathing of the Solid.

The uper parts of the Water, do no more re&longs;i&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, than the middle or lowe&longs;t parts.

Waters Re­ &longs;i&longs;tance of divi­ &longs;ion, not greater in the begin­ ning of the Sub­ mer&longs;ion.

Let us receive it, therefore, for a true and undoubted Conclu&longs;i­ on, That the Water hath not any Renitence again&longs;t &longs;imple Divi&longs;i­ on, and that it is not po&longs;&longs;ible to find any Solid Body, be it of what Figure it will, which being put into the Water, its Motion upwards or downwards, according as it exceedeth, or &longs;hall be exceeded by the Water in Gravity (although &longs;uch exce&longs;&longs;e and difference be in­ &longs;en&longs;ible) &longs;hall be prohibited, and taken away, by the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the &longs;aid Water. When, therefore, we &longs;ee the Board of Ebony, or of other Matter, more grave than the Water, to &longs;tay in the Con­ fines of the Water and Air, without &longs;ubmerging, we mu&longs;t have re­ cour&longs;e to &longs;ome other Originall, for the inve&longs;ting the Cau&longs;e of that Effect, than to the breadth of the Figure, unable to overcome the Renitence with which the Water oppo&longs;eth Divi&longs;ion, &longs;ince there is no Re&longs;i&longs;tance; and from that which is not in being, we can expect no Action. It remains mo&longs;t true, therefore, as we have &longs;aid before, that this &longs;o &longs;ucceds, for that that which in &longs;uch manner put upon the wa­ ter, not the &longs;ame Body with that which is put into the Water: becau&longs;e this which is put into the Water, is the pure Board of Ebony, which for that it is more grave than the Water, &longs;inketh, and that which is put upon the Water, is a Compo&longs;ition of Ebony, and of &longs;o much Air, that both together are &longs;pecifically le&longs;s grave than the Water, and therefore they do not de&longs;cend.

I will farther confirm this which I &longs;ay. Gentlemen, my Antago­ ni&longs;ts, we are agreed, that the exce&longs;s or defect of the Gravity of the Solid, unto the Gravity of the Water, is the true and proper Cau&longs;e of Natation or Submer&longs;ion.

Great Caution to be had in ex­ perimenting the operation of Fi­ gure in Natati­ on.

Now, if you will &longs;hew that be&longs;ides the former Cau&longs;e, there is ano­ ther which is &longs;o powerfull, that it can hinder and remove the Sub­ mer&longs;ion of tho&longs;e very Solids, that by their Gravity &longs;ink, and if you will &longs;ay, that this is the breadth or amplene&longs;s of Figure, you are ob­ lieged, when ever you would &longs;hew &longs;uch an Experiment, fir&longs;t to make the circum&longs;tances certain, that that Solid which you put into the Water, be not le&longs;s grave in &longs;pecie than it, for if you &longs;hould not do &longs;o any one might with rea&longs;on &longs;ay, that not the Figure, but the Levity was the cau&longs;e of that Natation. But I &longs;ay, that when you &longs;hall di­ mit a Board of Ebony into the Water, you do not put therein a Solid more grave in &longs;pecie than the Water, but one lighter, for be &longs;ides the Ebony, there is in the Water a Ma&longs;s of Air, united with the Ebony, and &longs;uch, and &longs;o light, that of both there re&longs;ults a Compo&longs;ition le&longs;s grave than the Water: See, therefore, that you remove the Air, and put the Ebony alone into the Water, for &longs;o you &longs;hall immerge a So­ lid more grave then the Water, and if this &longs;hall not go to the Bottom, you have well Philo&longs;ophized, and I ill.

Now, &longs;ince we have found the true Cau&longs;e of the Natation of tho&longs;e Bodies, which otherwi&longs;e as being graver than the Water, would de­ &longs;cend to the bottom, I think, that for the perfect and di&longs;tinct know­ ledge of this bu&longs;ine&longs;s, it would be good to proceed in a way of di&longs;­ covering demon&longs;tratively tho&longs;e particular Accidents that do attend the&longs;e effects, and,

PROBL. I.

To finde what proportion &longs;everall Figures of different

Matters ought to have, unto the Gravity of the Water, that &longs;o they may be able by vertue of the Contigucus Air to &longs;tay afloat.

To finde the proportion Fi­ gures ought to have to the wa­ ters Gravity, that by help of the contiguous Air, they may &longs;wim.

Let, therefore, for better illu&longs;tration, D F N E be a Ve&longs;&longs;ell, wherein the water is contained, and &longs;uppo&longs;e a Plate or Board, who&longs;e thickne&longs;s is comprehended between the Lines I C and O S, and let it be of Matter exceeding the water in Gravity, &longs;o that being put upon the water, it dimergeth and aba&longs;eth below the Levell of the &longs;aid water, leaving the little Banks A I and B C, which are at the greate&longs;t height they can be, &longs;o that if the Plate I S &longs;hould but de&longs;cend any little &longs;pace farther, the little Banks or Ramparts would no longer con&longs;i&longs;t, but expul&longs;ing the Air A I C B, they would dif­ fu&longs;e them&longs;elves over the Superficies I C, and would &longs;ubmerge the Plate. The height AIBC is therefore the greate&longs;t profundity that the

little Banks of water admit of. Now I &longs;ay, that from this, and from the proportion in Gra­ vity, that the Matter of the Plate hath to the water, we may ea&longs;ily &longs;inde of what thickne&longs;s, at mo&longs;t, we may make the &longs;aid Plates, to the end, they may be able to bear up above water: for if the Matter of the Plate or Board I S were, for Example, as heavy again as the water, a Board of that Matter &longs;hall be, at the mo&longs;t of a thickne&longs;s equall to the greate&longs;t height of the Banks, that is, as thick as A I is high: which we will thus demon&longs;trate. Lot the So­ lid I S be donble in Gravity to the water, and let it be a regular Pri&longs;me, or Cylinder, to wit, that hath its two flat Superficies, &longs;uperi­ our and inferiour, alike and equall, and at Right Angles with the o­ ther laterall Superficies, and let its thickne&longs;s I O be equall to the greate&longs;t Altitude of the Banks of water: I &longs;ay, that if it be put upon the water, it will not &longs;ubmerge: for the Altitude A I being equall to the Altitude I O, the Ma&longs;s of the Air A B C I &longs;hall be equall to the Ma&longs;s of
the Solid C I O S: and the whole Ma&longs;s A O S B double to the Ma&longs;s I S; And &longs;ince the Ma&longs;s of the Air A C, neither encrea&longs;eth nor dimi­ ni&longs;heth the Gravity of the Ma&longs;s I S, and the Solid I S was &longs;uppo&longs;ed double in Gravity to the water; Therefore as much water as the Ma&longs;s &longs;ubmerged A O S B, compounded of the Air A I C B, and of the Solid I O S C, weighs ju&longs;t as much as the &longs;ame &longs;ubmerged Ma&longs;s A O S B: but when &longs;uch a Ma&longs;s of water, as is the &longs;ubmerged part of the Solid, weighs as much as the &longs;aid Solid, it de&longs;cends not farther, but re&longs;teth, as by (a) Archimedes, and above by us, hath been de­> mon&longs;trated: Therefore, I S &longs;hall de&longs;cend no farther, but &longs;hall re&longs;t. And if the Solid I S &longs;hall be Se&longs;quialter in Gravity to the water, it &longs;hall float, as long as its thickne&longs;s be not above twice as much as the greate&longs;t Altitude of the Ramparts of water, that is, of A I.
For I S being Se&longs;quialter in Gravity to the water, and the Altitude O I being double to I A, the Solid &longs;ubmerged A O S B, &longs;hall be al&longs;o Se&longs;quialter in Ma&longs;s to the Solid I S. And becau&longs;e the Air A C, neither increa&longs;eth nor dimini&longs;heth the pondero&longs;ity of the Solid I S: Therefore, as much water in quantity as the &longs;ubmerged Ma&longs;s AOSB, weighs as much as the &longs;aid Ma&longs;s &longs;ubmerged: And, therefore, that Ma&longs;s &longs;hall re&longs;t. And briefly in generall.

Of Natation Lib. 1. Prop. 3.

THEOREME. VI.

When ever the exce&longs;s of the Gravity of the Solid above the Gravity of the Water, &longs;hall have the &longs;ame pro­ portion to the Gravity of the Water, that the Alti­ tude of the Rampart, hath to the thickne&longs;s of the Solid, that Solid &longs;hall not &longs;ink, but being never &longs;o lit­ tle thicker it &longs;hall.

The proporti­ on of the great­ e&longs;t thickne&longs;s of Solids, beyond which encrea­ &longs;ed they &longs;ink.

Let the Solid I S be &longs;uperior in Gravity to the water, and of &longs;uch thickne&longs;s, that the Altitude of the Rampart A I, be in proporti­ on to the thickne&longs;s of the Solid I O, as the exce&longs;s of the Gravi­ ty of the &longs;aid Solid I S, above the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Ma&longs;s I S, is to the Gravity of the Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Ma&longs;s I S. I &longs;ay, that the Solid I S &longs;hall not &longs;inke, but being never &longs;o little thicker it &longs;hall go to the bottom: For being that as A I is

to I O, &longs;o is the Exce&longs;s of the Gravity of the Solid I S, above the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Ma&longs;s I S, to the Gravity of the &longs;aid Ma&longs;s of water: Therefore, compounding, as A O is to O I, &longs;o &longs;hall the Gravity of the Solid I S, be to the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Ma&longs;s I S: And, converting, as I O is to O A, &longs;o &longs;hall the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Ma&longs;s I S, be to the Gravity of the Solid I S: But as I O is to O A, &longs;o is a Ma&longs;s of water I S, to a Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Ma&longs;s A B S O: and &longs;o is the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water I S, to the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water A S: Therefore as the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water, equall to the Ma&longs;s I S, is to the Gravity of the Solid I S, &longs;o is the &longs;ame Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water I S, to the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of Water A S: Therefore the Gra­ vity of the Solid I S, is equall to the Gravity of a Ma&longs;s of water e­ quall to the Ma&longs;s A S: But the Gravity of the Solid I S, is the &longs;ame with the Gravity of the Solid A S, compounded of the Solid I S, and of the Air A B C I. Therefore the whole compounded Solid A O S B, weighs as much as the water that would be compri&longs;ed in the place of the &longs;aid Compound A O S B: And, therefore, it &longs;hall make an Equilibrium and re&longs;t, and that &longs;ame Solid I O S C &longs;hall &longs;inke no farther. But if its thickne&longs;s I O &longs;hould be increa&longs;ed, it would be ne­ ce&longs;&longs;ary al&longs;o to encrea&longs;e the Altitude of the Rampart A I, to main­ tain the due proportion: But by what hath been &longs;uppo&longs;ed, the Alti­ tude of the Rampart A I, is the greate&longs;t that the Nature of the Water and Air do admit, without the waters repul&longs;ing the Air ad­ herent to the Superficies of the Solid I C, and po&longs;&longs;e&longs;&longs;ing the &longs;pace A I C B: Therefore, a Solid of greater thickne&longs;s than I O, and of the &longs;ame Matter with the Solid I S, &longs;hall not re&longs;t without &longs;ubmerging, but &longs;hall de&longs;cend to the bottome: which was to be demon&longs;trated. In con&longs;equence of this that hath been demon&longs;trated, &longs;undry and va­ rious Conclu&longs;ions may be gathered, by which the truth of my prin­ cipall Propo&longs;ition comes to be more and more confirmed, and the imperfection of all former Argumentations touching the pre&longs;ent Que&longs;tion cometh to be di&longs;covered.

And fir&longs;t we gather from the things demonstrated, that,

THEOREME VII.

The heavie&longs;t Bodies may &longs;wimme.

All Matters, how heavy &longs;oever, even to Gold it &longs;elf, the heavie&longs;t of all Bodies, known by us, may float upon the Water.

Becau&longs;e its Gravity being con&longs;idered to be almo&longs;t twenty times greater than that of the water, and, moreover, the greate&longs;t Alti­ tude that the Rampart of water can be extended to, without break ing the Contiguity of the Air, adherent to the Surface of the Solid, that is put upon the water being predetermined, if we &longs;hould make a Plate of Gold &longs;o thin, that it exceeds not the nineteenth part ofthe Altitude of the &longs;aid Rampart, this put lightly upon the water &longs;hall re&longs;t, without going to the bottom: and if Ebony &longs;hall chance to be in &longs;e&longs;qui&longs;eptimall proportion more grave than the water, the greate&longs;t thickne&longs;s that can be allowed to a Board of Ebony, &longs;o that it may be able to &longs;tay above water without &longs;inking, would be &longs;eaven times more than the height of the Rampart Tinn, v. gr. eight times more grave than water, &longs;hall &longs;wimm as oft as the thickne&longs;s of its Plate,

exceeds not the 7th part of the Altitude of the Rampart.

He el&longs;ewhere cites this as a Propo&longs;ition, there­ fore I make it of that number.

And here I will not omit to note, as a &longs;econd Corrollary dependent upon the things demon&longs;trated, that,

THEOREME VIII.

Natation and Submer&longs;ion, col­ lected from the thickne&longs;s, exclu­ ding the length and breadth of Plates.

The Expan&longs;ion of Figure not only is not the Cau&longs;e of the Natation of tho&longs;e grave Bodies, which otherwi&longs;e do &longs;ubmerge, but al&longs;o the determining what be tho&longs;e Boards of Ebony, or Plates of Iron or Gold that will &longs;wimme, depends not on it, rather that &longs;ame determina­ tion is to be collected from the only thickne&longs;s of tho&longs;e Figures of Ebony or Gold, wholly excluding the con­ &longs;ideration of length and breadth, as having no way any &longs;hare in this Effect.

It hath already been manife&longs;ted, that the only cau&longs;e of the Nata­ tion of the &longs;aid Plates, is the reduction of them to be le&longs;s grave than the water, by means of the connexion of that Air, which de­ &longs;cendeth together with them, and po&longs;&longs;e&longs;&longs;eth place in the water; which place &longs;o occupyed, if before the circumfu&longs;ed water diffu&longs;eth it &longs;elf to fill it, it be capable of as much water, as &longs;hall weigh equall with the Plate, the Plate &longs;hall remain &longs;u&longs;pended, and &longs;inke no farther.

Now let us &longs;ee on which of the&longs;e three dimen&longs;ions of the Solid depends the terminating, what and how much the Ma&longs;s of that ought to be, that &longs;o the a&longs;&longs;i&longs;tance of the Air contiguous unto it, may &longs;uffice to render it &longs;pecifically le&longs;s grave than the water, whereupon it may re&longs;t without Submer&longs;ion. It &longs;hall undoubtedly be found, that the length and breadth have not any thing to do in the &longs;aid determina­ tion, but only the height, or if you will the thickne&longs;s: for, if we take a Plate or Board, as for Example, of Ebony, who&longs;e Altitude hath unto the greate&longs;t po&longs;&longs;ible Altitude of the Rampart, the proportion above declared, for which cau&longs;e it &longs;wims indeed, but yet not if we never &longs;o little increa&longs;e its thickne&longs;s; I &longs;ay, that retaining its thick­ ne&longs;s, and encrea&longs;ing its Superficies to twice, four times, or ten times its bigne&longs;s, or dmini&longs;ning it by dividing it into four, or &longs;ix, or twenty, or a hundred parts, it &longs;hall &longs;till in the &longs;ame manner continue to float: but encrea&longs;ing its thickne&longs;s only a Hairs breadth, it will alwaies &longs;ubmerge, although we &longs;hould multiply the Superficies a hundred and a hundred times. Now fora&longs;much as that this is a Cau&longs;e, which being added, we adde al&longs;o the Effect, and being remo­ ved, it is removed; and by augmenting or le&longs;&longs;ening the length or breadth in any manner, the effect of going, or not going to the bot­ tom, is not added or removed: I conclude, that the greatne&longs;s and &longs;malne&longs;s of the Superficies hath no influence upon the Natation or Submer&longs;ion. And that the proportion of the Altitude of the Ram­ parts of Water, to the Altitude of the Solid, being con&longs;tituted in the manner afore&longs;aid, the greatne&longs;s or &longs;malne&longs;s of the Superficies, makes not any variation, is manife&longs;t from that which hath been above demon&longs;trated, and from this, that, The Pri&longs;ms and Cylinders which

have the &longs;ame Ba&longs;e, are in proportion to one another as their heights: Whence Cylinders or Prifmes, namely, the Board, be they great or little, &longs;o that they be all of equall thickne&longs;s, have the &longs;ame proportion to their Conterminall Air, which hath for Ba&longs;e the &longs;aid Superficies of the Board, and for height the Ramparts of water; &longs;o that alwayes of that Air, and of the Board, Solids are compounded, that in Gravity equall a Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Ma&longs;s of the Solids, compounded of Air, and of the Board: whereupon all the &longs;aid Solids do in the &longs;ame manner continue afloat. We will conclude in the third place, that,

Pri&longs;mes and Cylinders ha­ ving the &longs;ame Ba&longs;e, are to one another as their heights.

THEOREME. IX.

All Figures of all Matters, float by hep of the Rampart re­ pleni&longs;hed with Air, and &longs;ome but only touch the water.

All &longs;orts of Figures of what&longs;oever Matter, albeit more grave than the Water, do by Benefit of the &longs;aid Ram­ part, not only float, but &longs;ome Figures, though of the grave&longs;t Matter, do &longs;tay wholly above Water, wetting only the inferiour Surface that toucheth the Water.

And the&longs;e &longs;hall be all Figures, which from the inferiour Ba&longs;e up­ wards, grow le&longs;&longs;er and le&longs;&longs;er; the which we &longs;hall exemplifie for this time in Piramides or Cones, of which Figures the pa&longs;&longs;ions sre common. We will demon&longs;trate therefore, that,

It is po&longs;&longs;ible to form a Piramide, of any what&longs;oever Matter propo&longs;ed, which being put with its Ba&longs;e upon the Water, re&longs;ts not only without &longs;ubmerging, but without wetting it more then its Ba&longs;e.

For the explication of which it is requi&longs;ite, that we fir&longs;t demon&longs;trate the &longs;ub&longs;equent Lemma, namely, that,

LEMMA II.

Solids who&longs;e Ma&longs;&longs;es an&longs;wer in proportion contrarily to

their Specificall Gravities, are equall in Ab&longs;olute Gravities.

Solids who&longs;e Ma&longs;&longs;es are in contrary pro­ portion to their Specifick Gra­ vities, are equall in ab&longs;olute Gra vity.

Let A C and B be two Solids, and let the Ma&longs;s A C be to the Ma&longs;s B, as the Specificall Gravity of the Solid B, is to the Speci­ ficall Gravity of the Solid A C: I &longs;ay, the Solids A C and B are equall in ab&longs;olute weight, that is, equally grave. For

if the Ma&longs;s A C be equall to the Ma&longs;s B, then, by the A&longs;&longs;umption, the Specificall Gravity of B, &longs;hall be e­ quall to the Specificall Gravity of A C, and being e­ quall in Ma&longs;s, and of the &longs;ame Specificall Gravity they &longs;hall ab&longs;olutely weigh one as much as another. But if their Ma&longs;&longs;es &longs;hall be unequall, let the Ma&longs;s A C be greater, and in it take the part C, equall to the Ma&longs;s B. And, becau&longs;e the Ma&longs;&longs;es B and C are equall; the Ab&longs;olute weight of B, &longs;hall have the &longs;ame pro­ portion to the Ab&longs;olute weight of C, that the Specificall Gravity of B, hath to the Specificall Gravity of C; or of C A, which is the &longs;ame in &longs;pecie: But look what proportion the Specificall Gravity of B, hath to the Specificall Gravity of C A, the like proportion, by the A&longs;&longs;umption, hath the Ma&longs;s C A, to the Ma&longs;s B; that is, to the Ma&longs;s C: Therefore, the ab&longs;olute weight of B, to the ab&longs;olute weight of C, is as the Ma&longs;s A C to the Ma&longs;s C: But as the Ma&longs;s AC, is to the Ma&longs;s C, &longs;o is the ab&longs;olute weight of A C, to the ab&longs;olute weight of C: There­ fore the ab&longs;olute weight of B, hath the &longs;ame proportion to the ab&longs;o­ lute weight of C, that the ab&longs;olute weight of A C, hath to the ab­ &longs;olute weight of C: Therefore, the two Solids A C and B are equall in ab&longs;olute Gravity: which was to be demon&longs;trated. Having de­ mon&longs;trated this, I &longs;ay,

THEOREME X.

That it is po&longs;&longs;ible of any a&longs;&longs;igned Matter, to form a Pi- ramide or Cone upon any Ba&longs;e, which being put upon the Water &longs;hall not &longs;ubmerge, nor wet any more than its Ba&longs;e.

There may be Cones and Pira­ mides of any Matter, which demittedinto the water, re&longs;t only their Ba&longs;es.

Let the greate&longs;t po&longs;&longs;ible Altitude of the Rampart be the Line D B, and the Diameter of the Ba&longs;e of the Cone to be made of any Mat­ ter a&longs;&longs;igned B C, at right angles to D B: And as the Specificall Gravity of the Matter of the Piramide or Cone to be made, is to the Specificall Gravity of the water, &longs;o let the Altitude of the

Rampart D B, be to the third part of the Piramide or Cone A B C, de&longs;cribed upon the Ba&longs;e, who&longs;e Diameter is B C: I &longs;ay, that the &longs;aid Cone A B C, and any other Cone, lower then the &longs;ame, &longs;hall re&longs;t upon the Surface of the water B C without &longs;inking. Draw D F parallel to B C, and &longs;uppo&longs;e the Pri&longs;me or Cylinder E C, which &longs;hall be tripple to the Cone A B C. And, becau&longs;e the Cylinder D C hath the &longs;ame proportion to the Cylinder C E, that the Altitude D B, hath to the Altitude B E: But the Cylinder C E, is to the Cone A B C, as the Altitude E B is to the third part of the Altitude of the Cone: Therefore, by Equality of proportion, the Cylinder D C is to the Cone A B C, as D B is to the third part of the Altitude B E: But as D B is to the third part of B E, &longs;o is the Specificall Gravity of the Cone A B C, to the Specificall Gra­ vity of the water: Therefore, as the Ma&longs;s of the Solid D C, is to the Ma&longs;s of the Cone A B C, &longs;o is the Specificall Gravity of the &longs;aid Cone, to the Specificall Gravity of the water: Therefore, by the precedent Lemma, the Cone A B C weighs in ab&longs;olute Gravity as much as a Ma&longs;s of Water equall to the Ma&longs;s D C: But the water which by the impo&longs;ition of the Cone A B C, is driven out of its place, is as much as would preci&longs;ely lie in the place D C, and is equall in weight to the Cone that di&longs;placeth it: Therefore, there &longs;hall be an Equilibrium, and the Cone &longs;hall re&longs;t without farther &longs;ubmerging. And its ma­ nife&longs;t,

COROLARY I.

Among&longs;t Cones of the &longs;ame Ba&longs;e, tho&longs;e of lea&longs;t Al­ titude &longs;hall &longs;ink the lea&longs;t.

That making upon the &longs;ame Ba&longs;is, a Cone of a le&longs;s Altitude, it &longs;hall be al&longs;o le&longs;s grave, and &longs;hall &longs;o much the more re&longs;t without Submer&longs;ion.

COROLARY II.

It is manife&longs;t, al&longs;o, that one may make Cones and Piramids of any Matter

what&longs;oever, more grave than the water, which being put into the water, with the Apix or Point downwards, re&longs;t without Submer&longs;ion.

There may be Cones and Pira­ mides of any Matter, which demitted with the Point down­ wards do float a­ top.

Becau&longs;e if we rea&longs;&longs;ume what hath been above demon&longs;trated, of Pri&longs;ms and Cylinders, and that on Ba&longs;es equall to tho&longs;e of the &longs;aid Cylinders, we make Cones of the &longs;ame Matter, and thrree times as high as the Cylinders, they &longs;hall re&longs;t afloat, for that in Ma&longs;s and Gravity they &longs;hall be equall to tho&longs;e Cylinders, and by having their Ba&longs;es equall to tho&longs;e of the Cylinders, they &longs;hall leave equall Ma&longs;&longs;es of Air included within the Ramparts. This, which for Exam­ ple &longs;ake hath been demon&longs;trated, in Pri&longs;ms, Cylinders, Cones and Piramids, might be proved in all other Solid Figures, but it would require a whole Volume (&longs;uch is the multitude and variety of their Symptoms and Accidents) to comprehend the particuler demon&longs;tration of them all, and of their &longs;everall Segments: but I will to avoid prolixity in the pre&longs;ent Di&longs;cour&longs;e, content my &longs;elf, that by what I have declared every one of ordinary Capacity may comprehend, that there is not any Matter &longs;o grave, no not Gold it &longs;elf, of which one may not form all &longs;orts of Figures, which by vertue of the &longs;uperiour Air adherent to them, and not by the Waters Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Penetration, do remain afloat, &longs;o that they &longs;ink not. Nay, farther, I will &longs;hew, for removing that Error, that,

THEOREME XI.

A Piramide or Cone, demitted with the Point downwards &longs;hal &longs;wim, with its Ba&longs;e downward &longs;hall &longs;ink.

A Piramide or Cone put into the Water, with the Point downward &longs;hall &longs;wimme, and the &longs;ame put with the Ba&longs;e downwards &longs;hall &longs;inke, and it &longs;hall be impo&longs;&longs;ible to make it float.

Now the quite contrary would happen, if the difficulty of Pene­ trating the water, were that which had hindred the de&longs;cent, for that the &longs;aid Cone is far apter to pierce and penetrate with its &longs;harp Point, than with its broad and &longs;pacious Ba&longs;e.

And, to demon&longs;trate this, let the Cone be A B C, twice as grave as the water, and let its height be tripple to the height of the Rampart D A E C: I &longs;ay, fir&longs;t, that being put lightly into the water with the Point downwards, it &longs;hall not de&longs;cend to the bot­ tom: for the Aeriall Cylinder contained betwixt

the Ramparts D A C E, is equall in Ma&longs;s to the Cone A B C; &longs;o that the whole Ma&longs;s of the Solid compounded of the Air D A C E, and of the Cone A B C, &longs;hall be double to the Cone A C B: And, becau&longs;e the Cone A B C is &longs;uppo&longs;ed to be of Matter double in Gra­ vity to the water, therefore as much water as the whole Ma&longs;&longs;e D A B C E, placed beneath the Levell of the water, weighs as much as the Cone A B C: and, therefore, there &longs;hall be an Equilibrium, and the Cone A B C &longs;hall de&longs;cend no lower. Now, I &longs;ay farther, that the &longs;ame Cone placed with the Ba&longs;e downwards, &longs;hall &longs;ink to the bottom, without any po&longs;&longs;ibility of returning again, by any means to &longs;wimme.

Let, therefore, the Cone be A B D, double in Gravity to the water, and let its height be tripple the height

of the Rampart of water L B: It is already manife&longs;t, that it &longs;hall not &longs;tay wholly out of the water, becau&longs;e the Cylinder being com­ prehended betwixt the Ramparts L B D P, equall to the Cone A B D, and the Matter of the Cone, beig double in Gravity to the water, it is evident that the weight of the &longs;aid Cone &longs;hall be double to the weight of the Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Cylinder L B D P: Therefore it &longs;hall not re&longs;t in this &longs;tate, but &longs;hall de&longs;cend.

COROLARY I.

I &longs;ay farther; that much le&longs;&longs;e &longs;hall the &longs;aid Cone stay afloat, if one

immerge a part thereof.

Much le&longs;s &longs;hall the &longs;aid Cone &longs;wim, if one im­ merge a part thereof.

Which you may &longs;ee, comparing with the water as well the part that &longs;hall immerge as the other above water. Let us therefore of the Cone A B D, &longs;ubmergeth part N T O S, and advance the Point N S F above water. The Altitude of the Cone F N S, &longs;hall either be more than half the whole Altitude of the Cone F T O, or it &longs;hall not be more: if it &longs;hall be more than half, the Cone F N S &longs;hall be more than half of the Cylinder E N S C: for the Altitude of the Cone F N S, &longs;hall be more than Se&longs;quialter of the Altitude of the Cylinder E N S C: And, becau&longs;e the Matter of the Cone is &longs;uppo&longs;ed to be double in Specificall Gravity to the water, the water which would be contained within the Rampart E N S C, would be le&longs;s grave ab&longs;olutely than the Cone F N S; &longs;o that the whole Cone F N S cannot be &longs;u&longs;tained by the Rampart: But the part immerged N T O S, by being double in Specificall Gravity to the water, &longs;hall tend to the bottom: Therefore, the whole Cone F T O, as well in re&longs;pect of the part &longs;ubmerged, as the part above water &longs;hall de­ &longs;cend to the bottom. But if the Altitude of the Point F N S, &longs;hall be half the Altitude of the whole Cone F T O, the &longs;ame Altitude of the &longs;aid Cone F N S &longs;hall be Se&longs;quialter to the Altitude E N: and, therefore, E N S C &longs;hall be double to the Cone F N S; and as much water in Ma&longs;s as the Cylinder E N S C, would weigh as much as the part of the Cone F N S. But, becau&longs;e the other immerged part N T O S, is double in Gravity to the water, a Ma&longs;s of water equall to that compounded of the Cylinder E N S C, and of the Solid N T O S, &longs;hall weigh le&longs;s than the Cone F T O, by as much as the weight of a Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Solid N T O S: Therefore, the Cone &longs;ha l al&longs;o de&longs;cend. Again, becau&longs;e the Solid N T O S, is &longs;eptuple to the Cone F N S, to which the Cylinder E S is double, the propor­ tion of the Solid N T O S, &longs;hall be to the Cylinder E N S C, as &longs;eaven to two: Therefore, the whole Solid compounded of the Cylinder E N S C, and of the Solid N T O S, is much le&longs;s than double the Solid N T O S: Therefore, the &longs;ingle Solid N T O S, is much graver than a Ma&longs;s of water equall to the Ma&longs;s, compounded of the Clinder E N S C, and of N T O S.

COROLARY II.

Part of the Cones towards the Cu&longs;pis remo­ ved, it &longs;hall &longs;till &longs;ink.

From whence it followeth, that though one &longs;hould remove and take a­ way the part of the Cone F N S, the &longs;ole remainder N T O S would go to the bottom.

COROLARY III.

And if we &longs;hould more depre&longs;s the Cone F T O, it would be &longs;o much the

more impo&longs;&longs;ible that it &longs;hould &longs;u&longs;tain it &longs;elf afloat, the part &longs;ubmerged N T O S &longs;till encrea&longs;ing, and the Ma&longs;s of Air contained in the Rampart dimini&longs;hing, which ever grows le&longs;s, the more the Cone &longs;ubmergeth.

The more the Cone is immer­ ged, the more impo&longs;&longs;ible is its floating.

That Cone, therefore, that with its Ba&longs;e upwards, and its Cu&longs;pis downwards doth &longs;wimme, being dimitted with its Ba&longs;e downward mu&longs;t of nece&longs;&longs;ity &longs;inke. They have argued farre from the truth, therefore, who have a&longs;cribed the cau&longs;e of Natation to waters re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion, as to a pa&longs;&longs;ive principle, and to the breadth of the Figure, with which the divi&longs;ion is to be made, as the Efficient.

I come in the fourth place, to collect and conclude the rea&longs;on of that which I have propo&longs;ed to the Adver&longs;aries, namely,

THE OREME XII.

That it is po&longs;&longs;ible to fo m Solid Bodies, of what Figure and greatne&longs;s &longs;oever, that of their own Nature goe to the Bottome; But by the help of the Air con­ tained in the Rampart, re&longs;t without &longs;ubmerging.

Solids of any Figure & great­ ne&longs;&longs;e, that natu­ rally &longs;ink, may by help of the Air in the Ram­ part &longs;wimme.

The truth of this Propo&longs;ition is &longs;ufficiently manife&longs;t in all tho&longs;e Solid Figures, that determine in their uppermo&longs;t part in a plane Superficies: for making &longs;uch Figures of &longs;ome Matter &longs;pecifi­ cally as grave as the water, putting them into the water, &longs;o that the whole Ma&longs;s be covered, it is manife&longs;t, that they &longs;hall re&longs;t in all places, provided, that &longs;uch a Matter equall in weight to the water, may be exactly adju&longs;ted: and they &longs;hall by con&longs;equence, re&longs;t or lie even with the Levell of the water, without making any Rampart. If, therefore, in re&longs;pect of the Matter, &longs;uch Figures are apt to re&longs;t without &longs;ubmerging, though deprived of the help of the Rampart, it is manife&longs;t, that they may admit &longs;o much encrea&longs;e of Gravity, (without encrea&longs;ing their Ma&longs;&longs;es) as is the weight of as much water as would be contained within the Rampart, that is made about their upper plane Surface: by the help of which being &longs;u&longs;tained, they &longs;hall re&longs;t afloat, but being bathed, they &longs;hall de&longs;cend, having been made graver than the water. In Figures, therefore, that determine above in a plane, we may cleerly comprehend, that the Rampart added or removed, may prohibit or permit the de&longs;cent: but in tho&longs;e Figures that go le&longs;&longs;ening upwards towards the top, &longs;ome Per&longs;ons may, and that not without much &longs;eeming Rea&longs;on, doubt whether the &longs;ame may be done, and e&longs;pecially by tho&longs;e which terminate in a very acute Point, &longs;uch as are your Cones and &longs;mall Piramids. Touch­ ing the&longs;e, therefore, as more dubious than the re&longs;t, I will endeavour to demon&longs;trate, that they al&longs;o lie under the &longs;ame Accident of going, or not going to the Bottom, be they of any whatever bigne&longs;s. Let therefore the Cone be A B D, made of a matter &longs;pecifically as grave as the water; it is manife&longs;t

that being put all under water, it &longs;hall re&longs;t in all places (alwayes provided, that it &longs;hall weigh exactly as much as the water, which is almo&longs;t impo&longs;&longs;ible to effect) and that any &longs;mall weight being added to it, it &longs;hall &longs;ink to the bottom: but if it &longs;hall de&longs;cend downwards gently, I &longs;ay, that it &longs;hall make the Rampart E S T O, and that there &longs;hall &longs;tay out of the water the point A S T, tripple in height to the Rampart E S: which is manife&longs;t, for the Matter of the Cone weighing equally with the water, the part &longs;ubmerged S B D T, becomes indifferent to move downwards or upwards; and the Cone A S T, being equall in Ma&longs;s to the water that would be contained in the concave of the Rampart E S T O, &longs;hall be al&longs;o equall unto it in Gravity: and, therefore, there &longs;hall be a perfect Equilibrium, and, con&longs;equently, a Re&longs;t. Now here ari&longs;eth a doubt, whether the Cone A B D may be made heavier, in &longs;uch &longs;ort, that when it is put wholly under water, it goes to the bottom, but yet not in &longs;uch &longs;ort, as to take from the Rampart the vertue of &longs;u&longs;taining it that it &longs;ink not, and, the rea&longs;on of the doubt is this: that although at &longs;uch time as the Cone A B D is &longs;pecifically as grave as the water, the Rampart E S T O &longs;u&longs;taines it, not only when the point A S T is tripple in height to the Altitude of the Rampart E S, but al&longs;o when a le&longs;&longs;er part is above water; [for although in the De&longs;cent of the Cone the Point A S T by little and little dimini&longs;heth, and &longs;o likewi&longs;e the Rampart E S T O, yet the Point dimini&longs;heth in
greater proportion than the Rampart, in that it dimini&longs;heth according to all the three Di­ men&longs;ions, but the Rampart according to two only, the Altitude &longs;till remaining the &longs;ame; or, if you will, becau&longs;e the Cone S T goes di­ mini&longs;hing, according to the proportion of the cubes of the Lines that do &longs;ucce&longs;&longs;ively become the Diameters of the Ba&longs;es of emergent Cones, and the Ramparts dimini&longs;h according to the proportion of the Squares of the &longs;ame Lines; whereupon the proportions of the Points are alwayes Se&longs;quialter of the proportions of the Cylinders, con­ tained within the Rampart; &longs;o that if, for Example, the height of the emergent Point were double, or equall to the height of the Rampart, in the&longs;e ca&longs;es, the Cylinder contained within the Ram­ part, would be much greater than the &longs;aid Point, becau&longs;e it would be either &longs;e&longs;quialter or tripple, by rea&longs;on of which it would perhaps &longs;erve over and above to fu&longs;tain the whole Cone, &longs;ince the part &longs;ub­ merged would no longer weigh any thing;] yet, neverthele&longs;s, when any Gravity is added to the whole Ma&longs;s of the Cone, &longs;o that al&longs;o the part &longs;ubmerged is not without &longs;ome exce&longs;&longs;e of Gravity above the Gravity of the water, it is not manife&longs;t, whether the Cylinder con­ tained within the Rampart, in the de&longs;cent that the Cone &longs;hall make, can be reduced to &longs;uch a proportion unto the emergent Point, and to &longs;uch an exce&longs;&longs;e of Ma&longs;s above the Ma&longs;s of it, as to compen&longs;ate the exce&longs;&longs;e of the Cones Specificall Gravity above the Gravity of the wa­ ter: and the Scruple ari&longs;eth, becau&longs;e that howbeit in the de&longs;cent made by the Cone, the emergent Point A S T dimini&longs;heth, whereby there is al&longs;o a diminution of the exce&longs;s of the Cones Gravity above the Gravity of the water, yet the ca&longs;e &longs;tands &longs;o, that the Rampart doth al&longs;o contract it &longs;elf, and the Cylinder contained in it doth de­ mini&longs;h.
Neverthele&longs;s it &longs;hall be demon&longs;trated, how that the Cone A B D being of any &longs;uppo&longs;ed bigne&longs;&longs;e, and made at the fir&longs;t of a Matter exactly equall in Gravity to the Water, if there may be affixed to it &longs;ome Weight, by means of which it may de&longs;cend to the bottom, when &longs;ubmerged under water, it may al&longs;o by vertue of the Rampart &longs;tay above without &longs;inking.

Let, therefore, the Cone A B D be of any &longs;uppo&longs;ed greatne&longs;&longs;e, and alike in &longs;pecificall Gravity to the water. It is manife&longs;t, that being put lightly into the water, it &longs;hall re&longs;t without de&longs;cending; and it &longs;hall advance above water, the Point

AS T, tripple in height to the height of the Rampart E S: Now, &longs;uppo&longs;e the Cone A B D more depre&longs;&longs;ed, &longs;o that it advance above wa­ ter, only the Point A I R, higher by half than the Point A S T, with the Rampart about it C I R N. And, becau&longs;e, the Cone A B D is to the Cone A I R, as the cube of the Line S T is to the cube of the Line I R, but the Cylin­ der E S T O, is to the Cylinder C I R N, as the Square of S T to the Square of I R, the Cone A S T &longs;hall be Octuple to the Cone A I R, and the Cylinder E S T O, quadruple to the Cylinder C I R N: But the Cone A S T, is equall to the Cylinder E S T O: Therefore, the Cylinder C I R N, &longs;hall be double to the Cone A I R: and the water which might be contained in the Rampart C I R N, would be double in Ma&longs;s and in Weight to the Cone A I R, and, therefore, would be able to &longs;u&longs;tain the double of the Weight of the Cone AIR: Therefore, if to the whole Cone A B D, there be added as much Weight as the Gravity of the Cone A I R, that is to &longs;ay, the eighth part of the weight of the Cone A S T, it al&longs;o &longs;hall be &longs;u&longs;tained by the Rampart C I R N, but without that it &longs;hall go to the bottome: the Cone A B D, being, by the addition of the eighth part of the weight of the Cone A S T, made &longs;pecifically more grave than the water. But if the Altitude of the Cone A I R, were two thirds of the Altitude of the Cone A S T, the Cone A S T would be to the Cone A I R, as twenty &longs;even to eight; and the Cylinder E S T O, to the Cylinder C I R N, as nine to four, that is, as twenty &longs;even to twelve; and, therefore, the Cylinder C I R N, to the Cone A I R, as twelve to eight; and the exce&longs;s of the Cylinder C I R N, above the Cone A I R, to the Cone A S T, as four to twenty &longs;even: there­ fore if to the Cone A B D be added &longs;o much weight as is the four twenty &longs;evenths of the weight of the Cone A S T, which is a little more then its &longs;eventh part, it al&longs;o &longs;hall continue to &longs;wimme, and the height of the emergent Point &longs;hall be double to the height of the Rampart. This that hath been demon&longs;trated in Cones, exactly holds in Piramides, although the one or the other &longs;hould be very &longs;harp in their Point or Cu&longs;pis: From whence we conclude, that the &longs;ame Accident &longs;hall &longs;o much the more ea&longs;ily happen in all other Figures, by how much the le&longs;s &longs;harp the Tops &longs;hall be, in which they deter­ mine, being a&longs;&longs;i&longs;ted by more &longs;pacious Ramparts.

Natatiou ea&longs;i­ e&longs;t effected in Figures broad toward the top.

THEOREME XIII.

All Figures &longs;ink or &longs;wim, upon bathing or not bathing of their tops.

All Figures, therefore, of whatever greatne&longs;&longs;e, may go, and not go, to the Bottom, according as their Sumi­ ties or Tops &longs;hall be bathed or not bathed.

And this Accident being common to all &longs;orts of Figures, without exception of &longs;o much as one. Figure hath, therefore, no part in the production of this Effect, of &longs;ometimes &longs;inking, and &longs;ome­ times again not &longs;inking, but only the being &longs;ometimes conjoyned to, and &longs;ometimes &longs;eperated from, the &longs;upereminent Air: which cau&longs;e, in fine, who &longs;o &longs;hall rightly, and, as we &longs;ay, with both his Eyes, con&longs;ider this bu&longs;ine&longs;s, will find that it is reduced to, yea, that it really is the &longs;ame with, the true, Naturall and primary cau&longs;e of Natation or Submer&longs;ion; to wit, the exce&longs;s or deficiency of the Gravity of the water, in relation to the Gravity of that Solid Mag­ nitude, that is demitted into the water. For like as a Plate of Lead, as thick as the back of a Knife, which being put into the water by it &longs;elf alone goes to the bottom, if upon it you fa&longs;ten a piece of Cork four fingers thick, doth continue afloat, for that now the Solid that is demitted in the water, is not, as before, more grave than the water, but le&longs;s, &longs;o the Board of Ebony, of its own nature more grave than water; and, therefore, de&longs;cending to the bottom, when it is demit­ ted by it &longs;elf alone into the water, if it &longs;hall be put upon the water, conjoyned with an Expanded vail of Air, that together with the Ebony doth de&longs;cend, and that it be &longs;uch, as that it doth make with it a compound le&longs;s grave than &longs;o much water in Ma&longs;s, as equalleth the Ma&longs;s already &longs;ubmerged and depre&longs;&longs;ed beneath the Levell of the waters Surface, it &longs;hall not de&longs;cend any farther, but &longs;hall re&longs;t, for no other than the univer&longs;all and mo&longs;t common cau&longs;e, which is that Solid Magnitudes, le&longs;s grave in&longs;pecie than the water, go not to the bottom.

So that if one &longs;hould take a Plate of Lead, as for Example, a finger thick, and an handfull broad every way, and &longs;hould attempt to make it &longs;wimme, with putting it lightly on the water, he would lo&longs;e his Labour, becau&longs;e that if it &longs;hould be depre&longs;&longs;ed an Hairs breadth be­ yond the po&longs;&longs;ible Altitude of the Ramparts of water, it would dive and &longs;ink; but if whil&longs;t it is going downwards, one &longs;hould make certain Banks or Ramparts about it, that &longs;hould hinder the do fu&longs;ion of the water upon the &longs;aid Plate, the which Banks &longs;hould ri&longs;e &longs;o high, as that they might be able to contain as much water, as &longs;hould weigh equally with the &longs;aid Plate, it would, without all Que&longs;tion, de&longs;cend no lower, but would re&longs;t, as being &longs;u&longs;tained by vertue of the Air contained within the afore&longs;aid Ramparts: and, in &longs;hort, there would be a Ve&longs;&longs;ell by this means formed with the bottom of Lead. But if the thinne&longs;s of the Lead &longs;hall be &longs;uch, that a very &longs;mall height of Rampart would &longs;uffice to contain &longs;o much Air, as might keep it afloat, it &longs;hall al&longs;o re&longs;t without the Artificiall Banks or Ram­ parts, but yet not without the Air, becau&longs;e the Air by it &longs;elf makes Banks &longs;ufficient for a &longs;mall height, to re&longs;i&longs;t the Superfu&longs;ion of the water: &longs;o that that which in this ca&longs;e &longs;wimmes, is as it were a Ve&longs;&longs;ell filled with Air, by vertue of which it continueth afloat.

I will, in the la&longs;t place, with an other Experimeut, attempt to remove all difficulties, if &longs;o be there &longs;hould yet be any doubt le&longs;t in any one, touching the opperation of this ^{*}Continuity of the Air, with

the thin Plate which &longs;wims, and afterwards put an end to this part of my di&longs;cour&longs;e.

*Or rather Cor­ tiguity,

I &longs;uppo&longs;e my &longs;elf to be que&longs;tioning with &longs;ome of my Oponents.

Whether Figure have any influence upon the encrea&longs;e or diminu­ tion of the Re&longs;i&longs;tance in any Weight again&longs;t its being rai&longs;ed in the Air, and I &longs;uppo&longs;e, that I am to maintain the Affirmative, a&longs;&longs;ert­ ing that a Ma&longs;s of Lead, reduced to the Figure of a Ball, &longs;hall be rai&longs;ed with le&longs;s force, then if the &longs;ame had been made into a thinne and broad Plate, becau&longs;e that it in this &longs;pacious Figure, hath a great quantity of Air to penetrate, and in that other, more compacted and contracted very little: and to demon&longs;trate the truth of &longs;uch my O­ pinion, I will hang in a &longs;mall thred fir&longs;t the Ball or Bullet, and put that into the water, tying the thred that upholds it to one end of the Ballance that I hold in the Air, and to the other end I by degrees adde &longs;o much Weight, till that at la&longs;t it brings up the Ball of Lead out of the water: to do which, &longs;uppo&longs;e a Gravity of thirty Ounces &longs;ufficeth; I afcerwards reduce the &longs;aid Lead into a flat and thinne Plate, the which I likewi&longs;e put into the water, &longs;u&longs;pended by three threds, which hold it parallel to the Surface of the water, and put­ ting in the &longs;ame manner, Weights to the other end, till &longs;uch time as the Place comes to be rai&longs;ed and drawn out of the water: I finde that thirty &longs;ix ounces will not &longs;uffice to &longs;eperate it from the water, and rai&longs;e it thorow the Air: and arguing from this Experiment, I af­ firm, that I have fully demon&longs;trated the truth of my Propo&longs;ition. He re my Oponents de&longs;ires me to look down, &longs;hewing me a thing which I had not before ob&longs;erved, to wit, that in the A&longs;cent of the Plate out of the water, it draws after it another Plate (if I may &longs;o call it) of water, which before it divides and parts from the inferiour Surface of the Plate of Lead, is rai&longs;ed above the Levell of the other water, more than the thickne&longs;s of the back of a Knife: Then he goeth to repeat the Experiment with the Ball, and makes me &longs;ee, that it is but a very &longs;mall quantity of water, which cleaves to its compacted and contracted Figure: and then he &longs;ubjoynes, that its no wonder, if in &longs;eperating the thinne and broad Plate from the water, we meet with much greater Re&longs;i&longs;tance, than in &longs;eperating the Ball, &longs;ince together with the Plate, we are to rai&longs;e a great quantity of water, which occurreth not in the Ball: He telleth me moreover, how that our Que&longs;tion is, whether the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Elevation be greater in a dilated Plate of Lead, than in a Ball, and not whether more re&longs;i&longs;teth a Plate of Lead with a great quantity of water, or a Ball with a very little water: He &longs;heweth me in the clo&longs;e, that the putting the Plate and the Ball fir&longs;t into the water, to make proofe thereby of their Re&longs;i&longs;tance in the Air, is be&longs;ides our ca&longs;e, which treats of Elivating in the Air, and of things placed in the Air, and not of the Re&longs;i&longs;tance that is made in the Confines of the Air and water, and by things which are part in Air and part in water: and la&longs;tly, they make me feel with my hand, that when the thinne Plate is in the Air, and free from the weight of the water, it is rai&longs;ed with the very &longs;ame Force that rai&longs;eth the Ball. Seeing, and under&longs;tand­ ing the&longs;e things, I know not what to do, unle&longs;s to grant my &longs;elf con­ vinced, and to thank &longs;uch a Friend, for having made me to &longs;ee that which I never till then ob&longs;erved: and, being adverti&longs;ed by this &longs;ame Accident, to tell my Adver&longs;aries, that our Que&longs;tion is, whether a Board and a Ball of Ebony, equally go to the bottom in water, and not a Ball of Ebony and a Board of Ebony, joyned with another flat Body of Air: and, farthermore, that we &longs;peak of &longs;inking, and not &longs;inking to the bottom, in water, and not of that which happeneth in the Confines of the water and Air to Bodies that be part in the Air, and part in the water; nor much le&longs;s do we treat of the greater or le&longs;&longs;er Force requi&longs;ite in &longs;eperating this or that Body from the Air; not omitting to tell them, in the la&longs;t place, that the Air doth re&longs;i&longs;t, and gravitate downwards in the water, ju&longs;t &longs;o much as the water (if I may &longs;o &longs;peak) gravitates and re&longs;i&longs;ts upwards in the Air, and that the &longs;ame force is required to &longs;inke a Bladder under water, that is full of Air, as to rai&longs;e it in the Air, being full of water, removing the con­ &longs;ideration of the weight of that Filme or Skinne, and confidering the water and the Air only. And it is likewi&longs;e true, that the &longs;ame Force is required to &longs;ink a Cup or &longs;uch like Ve&longs;&longs;ell under water, whil&longs;t it is full of Air, as to rai&longs;e it above the Superficies of the water, keeping it with the mouth downwards; whil&longs;t it is full of water, which is con&longs;trained in the &longs;ame manner to follow the Cup which contains it, and to ri&longs;e above the other water into the Region of the Air, as the Air is forced to follow the &longs;ame Ve&longs;&longs;ell under the Surface of the wa­ ter, till that in this ca&longs;e the water, &longs;urmounting the brimme of the Cup, breaks in, driving thence the Air, and in that ca&longs;e, the &longs;aid brimme coming out of the water, and arriving to the Confines of the Air, the water falls down, and the Air &longs;ub-enters to fill the cavity of the Cup: upon which en&longs;ues, that he no le&longs;s tran&longs;gre&longs;&longs;es the Arti­ cles of the Convention, who produceth a Plate conjoyned with much Air, to &longs;ee if it de &longs;eend to the bottom in water, then he that makes proof of the Re&longs;i&longs;tance again&longs;t Elevation in Air with a Plate of Lead, joyned with a like quantity of water.

An Experi­ ment of the op­ peration of Fi­ gures, in en­ crea&longs;ing or le&longs;­ &longs;ening of the Airs Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion.

I have &longs;aid all that I could at pre&longs;ent think of, to maintain the A&longs;&longs;ertion I have undertook. It remains, that I examine that which Ari&longs;totle hath writ of this matter towards the end of his Book De Cælo; wherein I &longs;hall note two things: the one that it being true as hath been demon&longs;trated, that Figure hath nothing to do about the moving or not moving it &longs;elf upwards or downwards, it &longs;eemes that Aristotle at his fir&longs;t falling upon this Sp. culation, was of the &longs;ame opinion, as in my opinion may be collected from the examination of his words. Tis true, indeed, that in e&longs;&longs;aying afterwards to render a rea&longs;on of &longs;uch effect, as not having in my conceit hit upon the right, (which in the &longs;econd place I will examine) it &longs;eems that he is brought to admit the largene&longs;&longs;e of Figure, to be intere&longs;&longs;ed in this operation. As to the fir&longs;t particuler, hear the preci&longs;e words of Aristotle.

Ari&longs;totles opi­ nion touching the Operation of Figure ex­ amined.

Ari&longs;tot de Cælo, Lib. 4. Cap. 66.

Figures are not the Cau&longs;es of moving &longs;imply upwards or downwards, but of moving more &longs;lowly or &longs;wiftly, and by what means this comes to pa&longs;s, it is not difficult to &longs;ee.

Ari&longs;totle makes not Figure the cau&longs;e of Motion ab&longs;olutely, but of &longs;wi&longs;t or &longs;low motion,

Here fir&longs;t I note, that the terms being four, which fall under the pre&longs;ent con&longs;ideration, namely, Motion, Re&longs;t, Slowly and Swiftly: And Ari&longs;totle naming Figures as Cau&longs;es of Tardity and Velocity, ex­ cluding them from being the Cau&longs;e of ab&longs;olute and &longs;imple Motion, it &longs;eems nece&longs;&longs;ary, that he exclude them on the other &longs;ide, from being the Cau&longs;e of Re&longs;t, &longs;o that his meaning is this. Figures are not the Cau&longs;es of moving or not moving ab&longs;olutely, but of moving quickly or &longs;lowly: and, here, if any &longs;hould &longs;ay the mind of Ari&longs;totle is to exclude Figures from being Cau&longs;es of Motion, but yet not from being Cau&longs;es of Re&longs;t, &longs;o that the &longs;ence would be to remove from Figures, there being the Cau&longs;es of moving &longs;imply, but yet not there being Cau&longs;es of Re&longs;t, I would demand, whether we ought with Aristotle to under&longs;tand, that all Figures univer&longs;ally, are, in &longs;ome manner, the cau&longs;es of Re&longs;t in tho&longs;e Bodies, which otherwi&longs;e would move, or el&longs;e &longs;ome particular Figures only, as for Example, broad and thinne Figures: If all indifferently, then every Body &longs;hall re&longs;t: becau&longs;e every Body hath &longs;ome Figure, which is fal&longs;e: but if &longs;ome particular Figures only may be in &longs;ome manner a Cau&longs;e of Re&longs;t, as, for Example, the broad, then the others would be in &longs;ome manner the Cau&longs;es of Motion: for if from &longs;eeing &longs;ome Bodies of a contracted Figure move, which after dilated into Plates re&longs;t, may be inferred, that the Amplitude of Figure hath a part in the Cau&longs;e of that Re&longs;t; &longs;o from &longs;eeing &longs;uch like Figures re&longs;t, which afterwards contracted move, it may with the &longs;ame rea&longs;on be affirmed, that the united and contracted Figure, hath a part in cau&longs;ing Motion, as the remover of that which impeded it: The which again is directly oppo&longs;ite to what Ari&longs;totle &longs;aith, namely, that Figures are not the Cau&longs;es of Motion. Be&longs;ides, if Ari&longs;totle had admitted and not excluded Figures from be­ ing Cau&longs;es of not moving in &longs;ome Bodies, which moulded into ano­ ther Figure would move, he would have impertinently propounded in a dubitative manner, in the words immediately following, whence it is, that the large and thinne Plates of Lead or Iron, re&longs;t upon the water, &longs;ince the Cau&longs;e was apparent, namely, the Amplitude of Figure. Let us conclude, therefore, that the meaning of Ari&longs;totle in this place is to affirm, that Figures are not the Cau&longs;es of ab&longs;olutely moving or not moving, but only of moving &longs;wiftly or &longs;lowly: which we ought the rather to believe, in regard it is indeed a me&longs;t true con­ ceipt and opinion. Now the mird of Ari&longs;totle being &longs;uch, and ap­ pearing by con&longs;equence, rather contrary at the fir&longs;t &longs;ight, then fa­ vourable to the a&longs;&longs;ertion of the Oponents, it is nece&longs;&longs;ary, that their Interpretation be not exactly the &longs;ame with that, but &longs;uch, as being in part under&longs;tood by &longs;ome of them, and in part by others, was &longs;et down: and it may ea&longs;ily be indeed &longs;o, being an Interpretation con&longs;onent to the &longs;ence of the more famous Interpretors, which is, that the Adverbe Simply or Ab&longs;olutely, put in the Text, orght not to be joyned to the Verbe to Move, but with the Noun Cau&longs;es: &longs;o that the purport of Ari&longs;totles words, is to affirm, That Figures are not the Cau&longs;es ab&longs;olutely of moving or not moving, but yet are Cau&longs;es Se­ cundum quid, viz in &longs;ome &longs;ort; by which means, they are called Auxiliary and Concomitant Cau&longs;es: and this Propo&longs;ition is received and a&longs;&longs;erted as true by Signor Buonamico Lib. 5. Cap. 28. where he thus writes. There are other Cau&longs;es concomitant, by which &longs;ome things float, and others &longs;ink, among which the Figures of Bodies hath the fir&longs;t place, &c.

Lib. 4. Cap. 61 Text. 42.

Concerning this Propo&longs;ition, I meet with many doubts and diffi­ culties, for which me thinks the words of Ari&longs;totle are not capable of &longs;uch a con&longs;truction and &longs;ence, and the difficulties are the&longs;e.

Fir&longs;t in the order and di&longs;po&longs;ure of the words of Ari&longs;totle, the par­ ticle Simpliciter, or if you will ab&longs;oluté, is conjoyned with the Verb to move, and &longs;eperated from the Noun Cau&longs;es, the which is a great pre&longs;umption in my favour, &longs;eeing that the writing and the Text &longs;aith, Figures are not the Cau&longs;e of moving &longs;imply upwards or downwards, but of quicker or &longs;lower Motion: and, &longs;aith not, Figures are not &longs;imply the Cau&longs;es of moving upwards or down­ wards, and when the words of a Text receive, tran&longs;po&longs;ed, a &longs;ence different from that which they found, taken in the order wherein the Author di&longs;po&longs;eth them, it is not convenient to inverte them. And who will affirm that Ari&longs;totle de&longs;iring to write a Propo&longs;ition, would di&longs;po&longs;e the words in &longs;uch &longs;ort, that they &longs;hould import a different, nay, a contrary &longs;ence? contrary, I &longs;ay, becau&longs;e under­ &longs;tood as they are written; they &longs;ay, that Figures are not the Cau&longs;es of Motion, but inverted, they &longs;ay, that Figures are the Cau&longs;es of Motion, &c.

Moreover, if the intent of Aristotle had been to &longs;ay, that Figures are not &longs;imply the Cau&longs;es of moving upwards or downwards, but only Cau&longs;es Secundum quid, he would not have adjoyned tho&longs;e words, but they are Cau&longs;es of the more &longs;wift or &longs;low Motion; yea, the &longs;ubjoining this would have been not only &longs;uperfluous but fal&longs;e, for that the whole tenour of the Propo&longs;ition would import thus much. Figures are not the ab&longs;olute Cau&longs;es of moving upwards or down­ wards, but are the ab&longs;olute Cau&longs;e of the &longs;wift or &longs;low Motion; which is not true: becau&longs;e the primary Cau&longs;es of greater or le&longs;&longs;er Velocity, are by Ari&longs;totle in the 4th of his Phy&longs;icks, Text. 71. attri­ buted to the greater or le&longs;&longs;er Gravity of Moveables, compared a­ mong them&longs;elves, and to the greater or le&longs;&longs;er Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Medium's, depending on their greater or le&longs;s Cra&longs;&longs;itude: and the&longs;e are in&longs;erted by Ari&longs;totle as the primary Cau&longs;es; and the&longs;e two only are in that place nominated: and Figure comes afterwards to be con&longs;idered, Text. 74. rather as an In&longs;trumentall Cau&longs;e of the force of the Gravity, the which divides either with the Figure, or with the Impetus; and, indeed, Figure by it &longs;elf without the force of Gravity or Levity, would opperate nothing.

Iadde, that if Ari&longs;totle had an opinion that Figure had been in &longs;ome &longs;ort the Cau&longs;e of moving or not moving, the inqui&longs;ition which he makes immediately in a doubtfull manner, whence it comes, that a Plate of Lead flotes, would have been impertinent; for if but ju&longs;t before he had &longs;aid, that Figure was in a certain &longs;ort the Cau&longs;e of moving or not moving, he needed not to call in Que&longs;tion, by what Cau&longs;e the Plate of Lead &longs;wims, and then a&longs;cri­ bing the Cau&longs;e to its Figure; and framing a di&longs;cour&longs;e in this manner. Figure is a Cau&longs;e Secundum quid of not &longs;inking: but, now, if it be doubted, for what Cau&longs;e a thin Plate of Lead goes not to the bottom; it &longs;hall be an&longs;wered, that that proceeds from its Figure: a di&longs;cour&longs;e which would be indecent in a Child, much more in Ari&longs;totle; For where is the occa&longs;ion of doubting? And who &longs;ees not, that if Ari&longs;totle had held, that Figure was in &longs;ome &longs;ort a Cau&longs;e of Natation, he would without the lea&longs;t He&longs;itation have writ; That Figure is in a certain &longs;ort the Cau&longs;e of Natation, and therefore the Plate of Lead in re&longs;pect of its large and expatiated Figure &longs;wims; but if we take the propo&longs;ition of Ari&longs;totle as I &longs;ay, and as it is writte n, and as in­ deed it is true, the en&longs;uing words come in very oppo&longs;itely, as well in the introduction of &longs;wift and &longs;low, as in the que&longs;tion, which very pertinently offers it &longs;elf, and would &longs;ay thus much.

Figures are not the Cau&longs;e of moving or not moving &longs;imply up­ wards or downwards, but of moving more quickly or &longs;lowly: But if it be &longs;o, the Cau&longs;e is doubtfull, whence it proceeds, that a Plate of Lead or of Iron broad and thin doth &longs;wim, &c. And the occa&longs;ion of the doubt is obvious, becau&longs;e it &longs;eems at the fir&longs;t glance, that the Figure is the Cau&longs;e of this Natation, &longs;ince the &longs;ame Lead, or a le&longs;s quantity, but in another Figure, goes to the bottom, and we have already affirmed, that the Figure hath no &longs;hare in this effect.

La&longs;tly, if the intent of Ari&longs;totle in this place had been to &longs;ay, that Figures, although not ab&longs;olutely, are at lea&longs;t in &longs;ome mea&longs;ure the Cau&longs;e of moving or not moving: I would have it con&longs;idered, that he names no le&longs;s the Motion upwards, than the other down­ wards: and becau&longs;e in exemplifying it afterwards, he produceth no other Experiments than of a Plate of Lead, and Board of Ebony, Matters that of their own Nature go to the bottom, but by vertue (as our Adver&longs;aries &longs;ay) of their Figure, re&longs;t afloat; it is &longs;it that they &longs;hould produce &longs;ome other Experiment of tho&longs;e Matters, which by their Nature &longs;wims, but retained by their Figure re&longs;t at the bottom. But &longs;ince this is impo&longs;&longs;ible to be done, we conclude, that Ari&longs;totle in this place, hath not attributed any action to the Figure of &longs;imply moving or not moving.

But though he hath exqui&longs;itely Philo&longs;ophiz'd, in inve&longs;tigating the &longs;olution of the doubts he propo&longs;eth, yet will I not undertake to maintain, rather various difficulties, that pre&longs;ent them&longs;elves unto me, give me occa&longs;ion of &longs;u&longs;pecting that he hath not entirely di&longs;plaid unto us, the true Cau&longs;e of the pre&longs;ent Conclu&longs;ion: which difficulties I will propound one by one, ready to change opinion, when ever I am &longs;hewed, that the Truth is different from what I &longs;ay; to the confe&longs;&longs;ion whereof I am much more inclinable than to contra­ diction.

Ari&longs;totle erred in affirming a Needle dimitted long wayes to &longs;ink.

Ari&longs;totle having propounded the Que&longs;tion, whence it proceeds, that broad Plates of Iron or Lead, float or &longs;wim; he addeth (as it were &longs;trengthening the occa&longs;ion of doubting) fora&longs;much as other things, le&longs;s, and le&longs;s grave, be they round or long, as for in&longs;tance a Needle go to the bottom. Now I here doubt, or rather am certain, that a Needle put lightly upon the water, re&longs;ts afloat, no le&longs;s than the thin Plates of Iron or Lead. I cannot believe, albeit it hath been told me, that &longs;ome to defend Ari&longs;totle &longs;hould &longs;ay, that he intends a Needle demitted not longwayes but endwayes, and with the Point downwards; neverthele&longs;s, not to leave them &longs;o much as this, though very weak refuge, and which in my judgement Ari&longs;totle him&longs;elf would refu&longs;e, I &longs;ay it ought to be under&longs;tood, that the Needle mu&longs;t be demitted, according to the Dimen&longs;ion named by Ari&longs;totle, which is the length: becau&longs;e, if any other Dimen&longs;ion than that which is named, might or ought to be taken, I would &longs;ay, that even the Plates of Iron and Lead, &longs;ink to the bottom, if they be put into the water edgewayes and not flatwayes. But becau&longs;e Ari&longs;totle &longs;aith, broad Figures go not to the bottom, it is to be under&longs;tood, being demitted broadwayes: and, therefore, when he &longs;aith, long Figures as a Needle, albeit light, re&longs;t not afloat, it ought to be under&longs;tood of them when demitted longwayes.

Morcover, to &longs;ay that Ari&longs;totle is to be under&longs;tood of the Needle de­ mitted with the Point downwards, is to father upon him a great imper­ tinency; for in this place he &longs;aith, that little Particles of Lead or Iron, if they be round or long as a Needle, do &longs;ink to the bottome; &longs;o that by his Opinion, a Particle or &longs;mall Grain of Iron cannot &longs;wim: and if he thus believed, what a great folly would it be to &longs;ubjoyn, that neither would a Needle demitted endwayes &longs;wim? And what other is &longs;uch a Needle, but many &longs;uch like Graines accumulated one upon another? It was too unworthy of &longs;uch a man to &longs;ay, that one &longs;ingle Grain of Iron could not &longs;wim, and that neither can it &longs;wim, though you put a hundred more upon it.

La&longs;tly, either Ari&longs;totle believed, that a Needle demitted long­ wayes upon the water, would &longs;wim, or he believed that it would not &longs;wim: If he believed it would not &longs;wim, he might well &longs;peak as indeed he did; but if he believed and knew that it would &longs;loat, why, together with the dubious Problem of the Natation of broad Figure, though of ponderous Matter, hath he not al&longs;o introduced the Que&longs;tion; whence it proceeds, that even long and &longs;lender Fi­ gures, howbeit of Iron or Lead do &longs;wim? And the rather, for that the occa&longs;ion of doubting &longs;eems greater in long and narrow Figures, than in broad and thin, as from Aristotles not having doubted of it, is manife&longs;ted.

No le&longs;&longs;er an inconvenience would they fa&longs;ten upon Ari&longs;totle, who in his defence &longs;hould &longs;ay, that he means a Needle pretty thick, and not a &longs;mall one; for take it for granted to be intended of a &longs;mall one and it &longs;hall &longs;uffice to reply, that he believed that it would &longs;wim; and I will again charge him with having avoided a more wonderfull and intricate Probleme, and introduced the more facile and le&longs;s wonderfull.

We &longs;ay freely therefore; that Ari&longs;totle did hold, that only the broad Figure did &longs;wim, but the long and &longs;lender, &longs;uch as a Needle, not. The which neverthele&longs;s is fal&longs;e, as it is al&longs;o fal&longs;e in round Bodies: becau&longs;e, as from what hath been predemon&longs;trated, may be ga­ thered, little Balls of Lead and Iron, do in like manner &longs;wim.

He propo&longs;eth likewi&longs;e another Conclu&longs;ion, which likewi&longs;e &longs;eems

different from the truth, and it is, That &longs;ome things, by rea&longs;on of their littlene&longs;s fly in the Air, as the &longs;mall du&longs;t of the Earth, and the thin leaves of beaten Gold: but in my Opinion, Experience &longs;hews us, that that happens not only in the Air, but al&longs;o in the water, in which do de&longs;cend, even tho&longs;e Particles or Atomes of Earth, that di&longs;tur be it, who&longs;e minuity is &longs;uch, that they are not de&longs;ervable, &longs;ave only when they are many hundreds together. Therefore, the du&longs;t of the Earth, and beaten Gold, do not any way &longs;u&longs;tain them&longs;elves in the Air, but de&longs;cend downwards, and only fly to and again in the &longs;ame, when &longs;trong Windes rai&longs;e them, or other agitations of the Air commove them: and this al&longs;o happens in the commotion of the water, which rai&longs;eth its Sand from the bottom, and makes it muddy. But Ari&longs;totle cannot mean this impediment of the commotion, of which he makes no mention, nor names other than the lightne&longs;s of &longs;uch Minutiæ or Atomes, and the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Cra&longs;&longs;itudes of the Water and Air, by which we &longs;ee, that he &longs;peakes of a calme, and not di&longs;turbed and agitated Air: but in that ca&longs;e, neither Gold nor Earth, be they never &longs;o &longs;mall, are &longs;u&longs;tained, but &longs;peedily de&longs;cend.

Ari&longs;totle af­ fir meth &longs;ome Bodies volatile for their Minu­ ity, Text. 42.

Democritus pla­ ced the Cau&longs;e of Natation in certain &longs;iery A­ tomes.

He pa&longs;&longs;eth next to confute Democritus, which, by his Te&longs;timony would have it, that &longs;ome Fiery Atomes, which continually a&longs;cend through the water, do &longs;pring upwards, and &longs;u&longs;tain tho&longs;e grave Bodies, which are very broad, and that the narrow de&longs;cend to the bottom,

for that but a &longs;mall quantity of tho&longs;e Atomes, encounter and re&longs;i&longs;t them.

Ari&longs;tot. De Cœlo lib. 4. cap. 6. text. 43.

I &longs;ay, Ari&longs;totle confutes this po&longs;ition, &longs;aying, that that &longs;hould much more occurre in the Air, as the &longs;ame Democritus in&longs;tances a­ gain&longs;t him&longs;elf, but after he had moved the objection, he &longs;lightly re­ &longs;olves it, with &longs;aying, that tho&longs;e Corpu&longs;cles which a&longs;cend in the Air, make not their Impetus conjunctly. Here I will not &longs;ay, that the rea&longs;on alledged by Democritus is true, but I will only &longs;ay, it &longs;eems in my judgement, that it is not wholly confuted by Ari&longs;totle, whil&longs;t he &longs;aith, that were it true, that the calid a&longs;cending Atomes, &longs;hould &longs;u&longs;tain Bodies grave, but very broad, it would much more be done in the Air, than in Water, for that haply in the Opinion of Ari&longs;totle, the &longs;aid calid Atomes a&longs;cend with much greater Force and Velocity through the Air, than through the water. And if this be &longs;o, as I veri­ ly believe it is, the Objection of Ari&longs;totle in my judgement &longs;eems to give occa&longs;ion of &longs;u&longs;pecting, that he may po&longs;&longs;ibly be deceived in more than one particular: Fir&longs;t, becau&longs;e tho&longs;e calid Atomes, (whether they be Fiery Corpu&longs;cles, or whether they be Exhalations, or in &longs;hort, whatever other matter they be, that a&longs;cends upwards through the Air) cannot be believed to mount fa&longs;ter through Air, than through water: but rather on the contrary, they peradventure move more impetuou&longs;ly through the water, than through the Air, as hath been in part demon&longs;trated above. And here I cannot finde the rea­ &longs;on, why Ari&longs;totle &longs;eeing, that the de&longs;eending Motion of the &longs;ame Moveable, is more &longs;wift in Air, than in water, hath not adverti&longs;ed us, that from the contrary Motion, the contrary &longs;hould nece&longs;&longs;arily follow; to wit, that it is more &longs;wift in the water, than in the Air: for &longs;ince that the Moveable which de&longs;cendeth, moves &longs;wifter through the Air, than through the water, if we &longs;hould &longs;uppo&longs;e its Gravity gradually to dimini&longs;h, it would fir&longs;t become &longs;uch, that de&longs;cending &longs;wiftly through the Air, it would de&longs;cend but &longs;lowly through the water: and then again, it might be &longs;uch, that de&longs;cending in the Air, it &longs;hould a&longs;cend in the water: and being made yet le&longs;s grave, it &longs;hall a&longs;cend &longs;wiftly through the water, and yet de&longs;cend likewi&longs;e through the Air: and in &longs;hort, before it can begin to a&longs;cend, though but &longs;lowly through the Air, it &longs;hall a&longs;cend &longs;wiftly through the water: how then is it true, that a&longs;cending Moveables move &longs;wifter through the Air, than through the water?

Democritus con­ futed by Ari­ &longs;totle, text 43.

Ari&longs;totles con­ futation of De­ mocritus refuted by the Author.

That which hath made Ari&longs;totle believe, the Motion of A&longs;cent to be &longs;wifter in Air, than in water, was fir&longs;t, the having referred the Cau&longs;es of &longs;low and quick, as well in the Motion of A&longs;cent, as of De&longs;cent, only to the diver&longs;ity of the Figures of the Moveable, and to the more or le&longs;s Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the greater or le&longs;&longs;er Cra&longs;&longs;itude, or Ra­ rity of the Medium; not regarding the compari&longs;on of the Exce&longs;&longs;es of the Gravities of the Moveables, and of the Mediums: the which notwith&longs;tanding, is the mo&longs;t principal point in this affair: for if the augmentation and diminution of the Tardity or Velocity, &longs;hould have only re&longs;pect to the Den&longs;ity or Rarity of the Medium, every Body that de&longs;cends in Air, would de&longs;cend in water: becau&longs;e whatever difference is found between the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water, and that of the Air, may well be found between the Velocity of the &longs;ame Move­ able in the Air, and &longs;ome other Velocity: and this &longs;hould be its proper Velocity in the water, which is ab&longs;olutely fal&longs;e. The other occa&longs;ion is, that he did believe, that like as there is a po&longs;itive and in­ trin&longs;ecall Quality, whereby Elementary Bodies have a propen&longs;ion of moving towards the Centre of the Earth, &longs;o there is another like­ wi&longs;e intrin&longs;ecall, whereby &longs;ome of tho&longs;e Bodies have an Impetus of flying the Centre, and moving upwards: by Vertue of which in­ trin&longs;e call Principle, called by him Levity, the Moveables which have that &longs;ame Motion more ea&longs;ily penetrate the more &longs;ubtle Medium, than the more den&longs;e: but &longs;uch a Propo&longs;ition appears likewi&longs;e un­ certain, as I have above hinted in part, and as with Rea&longs;ons and Experiments, I could demon&longs;trate, did not the pre&longs;ent Argument im­ portune me, or could I di&longs;patch it in few words.

Lib. 4. Cap. 5.

The Objection therefore of Ari&longs;totle again&longs;t Democritus, whil&longs;t he &longs;aith, that if the Fiery a&longs;cending Atomes &longs;hould &longs;u&longs;tain Bodies grave, but of a di&longs;tended Figure, it would be more ob&longs;ervable in the Air than in the water, becau&longs;e &longs;uch Corpu&longs;cles move &longs;wifter in that, than in this, is not good; yea the contrary would evene, for that they a&longs;cend more &longs;lowly through the Air: and, be&longs;ides their moving &longs;lowly, they a&longs;cend, not united together, as in the water, but di&longs;continue, and, as we &longs;ay, &longs;catter: And, therefore, as Democritus well replyes, re&longs;olving the in&longs;tance they make not their pu&longs;h or Impetus conjunctly.

Ari&longs;totle, in the &longs;econd place, deceives him&longs;elf, whil&longs;t he will have the &longs;aid grave Bodies to be more ea&longs;ily &longs;u&longs;tained by the &longs;aid Fiery a&longs;cending Atomes in the Air than in the Water: not ob&longs;erv­ ing, that the &longs;aid Bodies are much more grave in that, than in this, and that &longs;uch a Body weighs ten pounds in the Air, which will not in the water weigh 1/2 an ounce; how can it then be more ea&longs;ily &longs;u&longs;tained in the Air, than in the Water?

Let us conclude, therefore, that Democritus hath in this particular better Philo&longs;ophated than Ari&longs;totle. But yet will not I affirm, that De- mocritus hath rea&longs;on'd rightly, but I rather &longs;ay, that there is a ma­ nife&longs;t Experiment that overthrows his Rea&longs;on, and this it is, That if it were true, that calid a&longs;cending Atomes &longs;hould uphold a Body, that if they did not hinder, would go to the bottom, it would follow, that we may find a Matter very little &longs;uperiour in Gravity to the water, the which being reduced into a Ball, or other contracted Figure, &longs;hould go to the bottom, as encountring but few Fiery A­ tomes; and which being di&longs;tended afterwards into a dilated and thin Plate, &longs;hould come to be thru&longs;t upwards by the impul&longs;ion of a great Multitude of tho&longs;e Corpu&longs;cles, and at la&longs;t carried to the very Surface of the water: which wee &longs;ee not to happen; Experience &longs;hewing us, that a Body v. gra. of a Sphericall Figure, which very hardly, and with very great lea&longs;ure goeth to the bottom, will re&longs;t there, and will al&longs;o de&longs;cend thither, being reduced into what&longs;oever other di&longs;tended Figure. We mu&longs;t needs &longs;ay then, either that in the water, there are no &longs;uch a&longs;cending Fiery Atoms, or if that &longs;uch there be, that they are not able to rai&longs;e and lift up any Plate of a Matter, that without them would go to the bottom: Of which two Pofitions, I e&longs;teem the &longs;econd to be true, under&longs;tanding it of water, con&longs;tituted in its naturall Coldne&longs;s. But if we take a Ve&longs;&longs;el of Gla&longs;s, or Bra&longs;s, or any other hard matter, full of cold water, within which is put a Solid of a flat or concave Figure, but that in Gravity exceeds the water &longs;o little, that it goes &longs;lowly to the bottom; I &longs;ay, that putting &longs;ome burning Coals under the &longs;aid Ve&longs;&longs;el, as &longs;oon as the new Fiery Atomes &longs;hall have penetrated the &longs;ub&longs;tance of the Ve&longs;&longs;el, they &longs;hall without doubt, a&longs;cend through that of the water, and thru&longs;ting a­ gain&longs;t the fore&longs;aid Solid, they &longs;hall drive it to the Superficies, and there detain it, as long as the incur&longs;ions of the &longs;aid Corpu&longs;cles &longs;hall la&longs;t, which cea&longs;ing after the removall of the Fire, the Solid being a­ bandoned by its &longs;upporters, &longs;hall return to the bottom.

Democritus con­ futed by the Authour.

But Democritus notes, that this Caufe only takes place when we treat of rai&longs;ing and &longs;u&longs;taining of Plates of Matters, but very little heavier than the water, or extreamly thin: but in Matters very grave, and of &longs;ome thickne&longs;s, as Plates of Lead or other Mettal, that &longs;ame Effect wholly cea&longs;eth: In Te&longs;timony of which, let's ob&longs;erve that &longs;uch Plates, being rai&longs;ed by the Fiery Atomes, a&longs;cend through all the depth of the water, and &longs;top at the Confines of the Air, &longs;till &longs;taying under water: but the Plates of the Opponents &longs;tay not, but only when they have their upper Superficies dry, nor is there any means to be u&longs;ed, that when they are within the water, they may not &longs;ink to the bottom. The cau&longs;e, therefore, of the Supernatation of the things of which Democritus &longs;peaks is one, and that of the Super­ natation of the things of which we &longs;peak is another. But, returning to Ari&longs;totle, methinks that he hath more weakly confuted Democritus, than Democritus him&longs;elf hath done: For Ari&longs;totle having propounded the Objection which he maketh again&longs;t him, and oppo&longs;ed him with &longs;aying, that if the calid a&longs;cendent Corpu&longs;cles were tho&longs;e that rai&longs;ed the thin Plate, much more then would &longs;uch a Solid be rai&longs;ed and born upwards through the Air, it &longs;heweth that the de&longs;ire in Ari&longs;totle to detect Democritus, was predominate over the exqui&longs;itene&longs;s of Solid Philo&longs;ophizing: which de&longs;ire of his he hath di&longs;covered in other oc­ ca&longs;ions, and that we may not digre&longs;s too far from this place, in the Text precedent to this Chapter which we have in hand; where he attempts to confute the &longs;ame Democritus, for that he, not content­ ing him&longs;elf with names only, had e&longs;&longs;ayed more particularly to de­ clare what things Gravity and Levity were; that is, the Cau&longs;es of de&longs;cending and a&longs;cending, (and had introduced Repletion and Va­ cuity) a&longs;cribing this to Fire, by which it moves upwards, and that to the Earth, by which it de&longs;cends; afterwards attributing to the Air more of Fire, and to the water more of Earth. But Ari&longs;totle de&longs;iring a po&longs;itive Cau&longs;e, even of a&longs;cending Motion, and not as Plato, or the&longs;e others, a &longs;imple negation, or privation, &longs;uch as Vacuity would be in reference to Repletion, argueth again&longs;t Democritus and &longs;aith: If it be true, as you &longs;uppo&longs;e, then there &longs;hall be a great Ma&longs;s of water, which &longs;hall have more of Fire, than a &longs;mall Ma&longs;s of Air, and a great Ma&longs;s of Air, which &longs;hall have more of Earth than a lit­ tle Ma&longs;s of water, whereby it would en&longs;ue, that a great Ma&longs;s of Air, &longs;hould come more &longs;wiftly downwards, than a little quantity of water: But that is never in any ca&longs;e &longs;oever: Therefore Democritus di&longs;cour&longs;eth erroneou&longs;ly.

Ari&longs;totle &longs;hews his de&longs;ire of finding Demo­ critus in an Er­ ror, to exceed that of di&longs;co­ veting Truth.

Cap. 5. Text 41.

Id. ibid.

But in my opinion, the Doctrine of Democritus, is not by this alle­ gation overthrown, but if I erre not, the manner of Ari&longs;totle deduction either concludes not, or if it do conclude any thing, it may with e­ quall force be re&longs;tored again&longs;t him&longs;elf. Democritus will grant to Ari&longs;totle, that there may be a great Ma&longs;s of Air taken, which con­ tains more Earth, than a &longs;mall quantity of water, but yet will deny, that &longs;uch a Ma&longs;s of Air, &longs;hall go fa&longs;ter downwards than a little water, and that for many rea&longs;ons. Fir&longs;t, becau&longs;e if the greater quantity of Earth, contained in the great Ma&longs;s of Air, ought to cau&longs;e a greater Velocity than a le&longs;s quantity of Earth, contained in a little quantity of water, it would be nece&longs;&longs;ary, fir&longs;t, that it were true, that a greater Ma&longs;s of pure Earth, &longs;hould move more &longs;wiftly than a le&longs;s: But this is fal&longs;e, though Ari&longs;totle in many places affirms it to be true: becau&longs;e not the greater ab&longs;olute, but the greater &longs;pecificall Gravity, is the cau&longs;e of greater Velocity: nor doth a Ball of Wood, weigh­ ing ten pounds, de&longs;cend more &longs;wiftly than one weighing ten Ounces, and that is of the &longs;ame Matter: but indeed a Bullet of Lead of four Ounces, de&longs;cendeth more &longs;wiftly than a Ball of Wood of twenty Pounds: becau&longs;e the Lead is more grave in &longs;pecie than the Wood. Therefore, its not nece&longs;&longs;ary, that a great Ma&longs;s of Air, by rea&longs;on of the much Earth contained in it, do de&longs;cend more &longs;wiftly than a little Ma&longs;s of water, but on the contrary, any what&longs;oever Ma&longs;s of water, &longs;hall move more &longs;wiftly than any other of Air, by rea&longs;on the partici­ pation of the terrene parts in &longs;pecie is greater in the water, than in the Air. Let us note, in the &longs;econd place, how that in multiplying the Ma&longs;s of the Air, we not only multiply that which is therein of terrene, but its Fire al&longs;o: whence the Cau&longs;e of a&longs;cending, no le&longs;s encrea&longs;eth, by vertue of the Fire, than that of de&longs;cending on the account of its multiplied Earth. It was requi&longs;ite in increa&longs;ing the greatne&longs;s of the Air, to multiply that which it hath of terrene only, leaving its Fire in its fir&longs;t &longs;tate, for then the terrene parts of the augmented Air, overcoming the terrene parts of the &longs;mall quantity of water, it might with more probability have been pretended, that the great quanti­ ty of Air, ought to de&longs;cend with a greater Impetus, than the little quantity of water.

The greater Specificall, not the greater ab­ &longs;olute Gravity, is the Cau&longs;e of Velocity.

Any Ma&longs;s of water &longs;hal move more &longs;wiftly, than any of Air, and why.

Therefore, the Fallacy lyes more in the Di&longs;cour&longs;e of Ari&longs;totle, than in that of Democritus, who with &longs;everall other Rea&longs;ons might oppo&longs;e Ari&longs;totle, and alledge; If it be true, that the extreame Elements be one &longs;imply grave, and the other &longs;imply light, and that the mean Elements participate of the one, and of the other Nature; but the Air more of Levity, and the water more of Gravity, then there &longs;hall be a great Ma&longs;s of Air, who&longs;e Gravity &longs;hall exceed the Gravity of a little quantity of water; and therefore &longs;uch a Ma&longs;s of Air &longs;hall de­ &longs;cend more &longs;wiftly than that little water: But that is never &longs;een to occurr: Therefore its not true, that the mean Elements do partici­ pate of the one, and the other quality. This argument is fallacious, no le&longs;s than the other again&longs;t Democritus.

La&longs;tly, Aristotle having &longs;aid, that if the Po&longs;ition of Democritus were true, it would follow, that a great Ma&longs;s of Air &longs;hould move more &longs;wiftly than a &longs;mall Ma&longs;s of water, and afterwards &longs;ubjoyned, that that is never &longs;een in any Ca&longs;e: methinks others may become de­ &longs;irous to know of him in what place this &longs;hould evene, which he de­ duceth again&longs;t Democritus, and what Experiment teacheth us, that it never falls out &longs;o. To &longs;uppo&longs;e to &longs;ee it in the Element of water, or in that of the Air is vain, becau&longs;e neither doth water through water, nor Air through Air move, nor would they ever by any whatever participation others a&longs;&longs;ign them, of Earth or of Fire: the Earth, in that it is not a Body fluid, and yielding to the mobility of other Bodies, is a mo&longs;t improper place and Medium for &longs;uch an Ex­ periment: Vacuum, according to the &longs;ame Ari&longs;totle him&longs;elf, there is none, and were there, nothing would move in it: there remaine the Region of Fire, but being &longs;o far di&longs;tant from us, what Experi­ ment can a&longs;&longs;ure us, or hath a&longs;&longs;ertained Ari&longs;totle in &longs;uch &longs;ort, that he &longs;hould as of a thing mo&longs;t obvious to &longs;ence, affirm what he produ­ ceth in confutation of Democritus, to wit, that a great Ma&longs;s of Air, is moved no &longs;wifter than a little one of water? But I will dwell no longer upon this matter, whereon I have &longs;poke &longs;ufficiently: but leaving Democritus, I return to the Text of Ari&longs;totle, wherein he goes about to render the true rea&longs;on, how it comes to pa&longs;s, that the thin Plates of Iron or Lead do &longs;wim on the water; and, moreover, that Gold it &longs;elf being beaten into thin Leaves, not only &longs;wims in water, but flyeth too and again in the Air. He &longs;uppo&longs;eth that of Continualls, &longs;ome are ea&longs;ily divi&longs;ible, others not: and that of the ea&longs;ily divi&longs;ible, &longs;ome are more &longs;o, and &longs;ome le&longs;s: and the&longs;e he affirms we &longs;hould e&longs;teem the Cau&longs;es. He addes that that is ea&longs;ily divi&longs;ible, which is well terminated, and the more the more divi&longs;ible, and that the Air is more &longs;o, than the water, and the water than the Earth. And, la&longs;tly, he &longs;uppo&longs;eth that in each kind, the le&longs;&longs;e quan­ tity is ea&longs;lyer divided and broken than the greater.

De Cœlo l. 4. c. 6. t. 44.

Here I note, that the Conclu&longs;ions of Ari&longs;totle in generall are all true, but methinks, that he applyeth them to particulars, in which they have no place, as indeed they have in others, as for Example, Wax is more ea&longs;ily divi&longs;ible than Lead, and Lead than Silver, in­ a&longs;much as Wax receives all the terms more ea&longs;iler than Lead, and Lead than Silver. Its true, moreover, that a little quantity of Sil­ ver is ea&longs;lier divided than a great Ma&longs;s: and all the&longs;e Propo&longs;itions are true, becau&longs;e true it is, that in Silver, Lead and Wax, there is &longs;imply a Re&longs;i&longs;tance again&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, and where there is the ab&longs;o­ lute, there is al&longs;o the re&longs;pective. But if as well in water as in Air, there be no Renitence again&longs;t &longs;imple Divi&longs;ion, how can we &longs;ay, that the water is ea&longs;lier divided than the Air? We know not how to ex­ tricate our &longs;elves from the Equivocation: whereupon I return to an&longs;wer, that Re&longs;i&longs;tance of ab&longs;olute Divi&longs;ion is one thing, and Re­ &longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion made with &longs;uch and &longs;uch Velocity is another. But to produce Re&longs;t, and to abate the Motion, the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of ab&longs;olute Divi&longs;ion is nece&longs;&longs;ary; and the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of &longs;peedy Di­ vi&longs;ion, cau&longs;eth not Re&longs;t, but &longs;lowne&longs;s of Motion. But that as well in the Air, as in water, there is no Re&longs;i&longs;tance of &longs;imple Divi&longs;ion, is manife&longs;t, for that there is not found any Solid Body which divides not the Air, and al&longs;o the water: and that beaten Gold, or &longs;mall du&longs;t, are not able to &longs;uperate the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Air, is contrary to that which Experience &longs;hews us, for we &longs;ee Gold and Du&longs;t to go waving to and again in the Air, and at la&longs;t to de&longs;cend down­ wards, and to do the &longs;ame in the water, if it be put therein, and &longs;e­ parated from the Air. And, becau&longs;e, as I &longs;ay, neither the water, nor the Air do re&longs;i&longs;t &longs;imple Divi&longs;ion, it cannot be &longs;aid, that the water re&longs;i&longs;ts more than the Air. Nor let any object unto me, the Exam­ ple of mo&longs;t light Bodies, as a Feather, or a little of the pith of El­ der, or water-reed that divides the Air and not the water, and from this infer, that the Ait is ea&longs;lier divi&longs;ible than the water; for I &longs;ay unto them, that if they do well ob&longs;erve, they &longs;hall &longs;ee the &longs;ame Body likewi&longs;e divide the Continuity of the water, and &longs;ubmerge in part, and in &longs;uch a part, as that &longs;o much water in Ma&longs;s would weigh as much as the whole Solid. And if they &longs;hal yet per&longs;i&longs;t in their doubt, that &longs;uch a Solid &longs;inks not through inability to divide the water, I will return them this reply, that if they put it under water, and then let it go, they &longs;hall &longs;ee it divide the water, and pre&longs;ently a&longs;cend with no le&longs;s celerity, than that with which it divided the Air in de&longs;cending: &longs;o that to &longs;ay that this Solid a&longs;cends in the Air, but that coming to the water, it cea&longs;eth its Motion, and therefore the water is more difficult to be divided, concludes nothing: for I, on the contrary, will propo&longs;e them a piece of Wood, or of Wax, which ri&longs;eth from the bottom of the water, and ea&longs;ily divides its Re&longs;i&longs;tance, which afterwards being arri­ ved at the Air, &longs;tayeth there, and hardly toucheth it; whence I may aswell &longs;ay, that the water is more ea&longs;ier divided than the Air

Archimed. De In&longs;ident, humi lib. 2. prop. 1.

I will not on this occa&longs;ion forbear to give warning of another fal­ lacy of the&longs;e per&longs;ons, who attribute the rea&longs;on of &longs;inking or &longs;wimming to the greater or le&longs;&longs;e Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water again&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, making u&longs;e of the example of an Egg, which in &longs;weet water goeth to the bottom, but in &longs;alt water &longs;wims; and alledging for the cau&longs;e thereof, the faint Re&longs;i&longs;tance of fre&longs;h water again&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, and the &longs;trong Re&longs;i&longs;tance of &longs;alt water But if I mi&longs;take not, from the &longs;ame Experiment, we may aswell deduce the quite contrary; namely, that the fre&longs;h water is more den&longs;e, and the &longs;alt more tenuous and &longs;ubtle, &longs;ince an Egg from the bottom of &longs;alt water &longs;peedily a&longs;cends to the top, and divides its Re&longs;i&longs;tance, which it cannot do in the fre&longs;h, in who&longs;e bottom it &longs;tays, being unable to ri&longs;e upwards. Into &longs;uch like perplex­ ities, do fal&longs;e Principles Lead men: but he that rightly Philo&longs;ophating, &longs;hall acknowledge the exce&longs;&longs;es of the Gravities of the Moveables and of the Mediums, to be the Cau&longs;es of tho&longs;e effects, will &longs;ay, that the Egg &longs;inks to the bottom in fre&longs;h water, for that it is more grave than it, and &longs;wimeth in the &longs;alt, for that its le&longs;s grave than it: and &longs;hall without any ab&longs;urdity, very &longs;olidly e&longs;tabli&longs;h his Conclu&longs;ions.

Therefore the rea&longs;on totally cea&longs;eth, that Ari&longs;totle &longs;ubjoyns in the Text &longs;aying; The things, therefore, which have great breadth remain above, becau&longs;e they comprehend much, and that which is greater, is not ea&longs;ily divided. Such di&longs;cour&longs;ing cea&longs;eth, I &longs;ay, becau&longs;e its not true, that there is in water or in Air any Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion; be­ &longs;ides that the Plate of Lead when it &longs;tays, hath already divided and penetrated the Cra&longs;&longs;itude of the water, and profounded it &longs;elf ten or twelve times more than its own thickne&longs;s: be&longs;ides that &longs;uch Re&longs;i&longs;tance of Divi&longs;ion, were it &longs;uppo&longs;ed to be in the water, could not rationally be affirmed to be more in its &longs;uperiour parts than in the middle, and lower: but if there were any difference, the inferiour &longs;hould be the more den&longs;e, &longs;o that the Plate would be no le&longs;s unable to penetrate the lower, than the &longs;uperiour parts of the water; neverthele&longs;s we &longs;ee that no &longs;ooner do we wet the &longs;uperious Superficies of the Board or thin Piece of Wood, but it precipitatly, and without any reten&longs;ion, de&longs;cends to the bottom.

Text 45.

I believe not after all this, that any (thinking perhaps thereby to defend Aristotle) will &longs;ay, that it being true, that the much water re­ &longs;i&longs;ts more than the little, the &longs;aid Board being put lower de&longs;cendeth, becau&longs;e there remaineth a le&longs;s Ma&longs;s of water to be divided by it: be­ cau&longs;e if after the having &longs;een the &longs;ame Board &longs;wim in four Inches of water, and al&longs;o after that in the &longs;ame to &longs;ink, he &longs;hall try the &longs;ame Experiment upon a profundity of ten or twenty fathom water, he &longs;hall &longs;ee the very &longs;elf &longs;ame effect. And here I will take occa&longs;ion to remember, for the removall of an Error that is too common; That that Ship or other what&longs;oever Body, that on the depth of an hundred or a thou&longs;and fathom, &longs;wims with &longs;ubmerging only &longs;ix fathom of its own height, [or in the Sea dialect, that draws &longs;ix fathom water] &longs;hall &longs;wim in the &longs;ame manner in water, that hath but &longs;ix fathom and half an Inch of depth. Nor do I on the other &longs;ide, think that it can be &longs;aid, that the &longs;uperiour parts of the water are the more den&longs;e, al­ though a mo&longs;t grave Authour hath e&longs;teemed the &longs;uperiour water in the Sea to be &longs;o, grounding his opinion upon its being more &longs;alt, than that at the bottom: but I doubt the Experiment, whether hitherto in taking the water from the bottom, the Ob&longs;ervatour did not light upon &longs;ome &longs;pring of fre&longs;h water there &longs;pouting up: but we plainly &longs;ee on the contrary, the fre&longs;h Waters of Rivers to dilate them&longs;elves for &longs;ome miles beyond their place of meeting with the &longs;alt water of the Sea, without de&longs;cending in it, or mixing with it, unle&longs;s by the intervention of &longs;ome commotion or turbulency of the Windes.

A Ship that in 100 Fathome water draweth 6 Fathome, &longs;hall float in 6 Fa­ thome and 1/2 an Inch of depth.

But returning to Aristotle, I &longs;ay, that the breadth of Figure hath nothing to do in this bu&longs;ine&longs;s more or le&longs;s, becau&longs;e the &longs;aid Plate of Lead, or other Matter, cut into long Slices, &longs;wim neither more nor le&longs;s; and the &longs;ame &longs;hall the Slices do, being cut anew into little pieces, becau&longs;e its not the breadth but the thickne&longs;s that operates in this bu&longs;ine&longs;s. I &longs;ay farther, that in ca&longs;e it were really true, that the Renitence to Divi&longs;ion were the proper Cau&longs;e of &longs;wimming, the Fi­ gures more narrow and &longs;hort, would much better &longs;wim than the more &longs;pacious and broad, &longs;o that augmenting the breadth of the Figure, the facility of &longs;upernatation will be demini&longs;hed, and decrea&longs;ing, that this will encrea&longs;e.

Thickne&longs;s not breadth of Fi­ gure to be re­ &longs;pected in Na­ tation.

Were Reni­ tence the cau&longs;e of Natation, breadth of Fi­ gure would hinder the &longs;wiming of Bo­ dies.

And for declaration of what I &longs;ay, con&longs;ider that when a thin Plate of Lead de&longs;cends, dividing the water, the Divi&longs;ion and di&longs;continu­ ation is made between the parts of the water, invironing the perime­ ter or Circumference of the &longs;aid Plate, and according to the big­ ne&longs;s greater or le&longs;&longs;er of that circuit, it hath to divide a greater or le&longs;&longs;er quantity of water, &longs;o that if the circuit, &longs;uppo&longs;e of a Board, be ten Feet in &longs;inking it flatways, it is to make the &longs;eperation and divi&longs;ion, and to &longs;o &longs;peak, an inci&longs;&longs;ion upon ten Feet of water; and likewi&longs;e a le&longs;&longs;er Board that is four Feet in Perimeter, mu&longs;t make an ince&longs;&longs;ion of four Feet. This granted, he that hath any knowledge in Geometry, will comprehend, not only that a Board &longs;awed in many long thin pieces, will much better float than when it was entire, but that all Figures, the more &longs;hort and narrow they be, &longs;hall &longs;o much the better &longs;wim. Let the Board ABCD be, for Example, eight Palmes long, and five broad, its circuit &longs;hall be twenty &longs;ix Palmes; and &longs;o many mu&longs;t the ince&longs;&longs;ion be, which it &longs;hall make in the water to de&longs;cend therein: but if we do &longs;aw ir, as &longs;uppo&longs;e into eight little pieces, according to the Lines E F, G H, &c. making &longs;even Segments, we mu&longs;t adde to the twenty &longs;ix Palmes of the circuit of the whole Board, &longs;eventy others; whereupon the eight little pieces &longs;o cut and &longs;eperated, have to cut ninty &longs;ix Palmes of water. And, if moreover, we cur each of the &longs;aid pieces into five parts, re­

ducing them into Squares, to the circuit of ninty &longs;ix Palmes, with four cuts of eight Palmes apiece; we &longs;hall adde al&longs;o &longs;ixty four Palmes, whereupon the &longs;aid Squares to de&longs;cend in the water, mu&longs;t divide one hundred and &longs;ixty Palmes of water, but the Re&longs;i&longs;tance is much greater than that of twenty &longs;ix; therefore to the le&longs;&longs;er Superficies, we &longs;hall reduce them, &longs;o much the more ea&longs;ily will they float: and the &longs;ame will happen in all other Figures, who&longs;e Superficies are &longs;imular among&longs;t them&longs;elves, but different in bigne&longs;s: becau&longs;e the &longs;aid Superficies, being either demini­ &longs;hed or encrea&longs;ed, always dimini&longs;h or encrea&longs;e their Perimeters in &longs;ubduple proportion; to wit, the Re&longs;i&longs;tance that they find in pene­ trating the water; therefore the little pieces gradually &longs;wim, with more and more facility as their breadth is le&longs;&longs;ened.

This is manife&longs;t; for keeping &longs;till the &longs;ame height of the Solid, with the &longs;ame proportion as the Ba&longs;e encrea&longs;eth or demini&longs;heth, doth the &longs;aid Solid al&longs;o encrea&longs;e or dimini&longs;h; whereupon the Solid more dimini&longs;hing than the Circuit, the Cau&longs;e of Submer&longs;ion more dimini&longs;heth than the Cau&longs;e of Natation: And on the contrary, the Solid more encrea&longs;ing than the Circuit, the Cau&longs;e of Submer&longs;ion encrea&longs;eth more, that of Natation le&longs;s.

And this may all be dedueed out of the Doctrine of Ari&longs;totlegain&longs;t his own Doctrine.

La&longs;tly, to that which we read in the latter part of the Text, that is to &longs;ay, that we mu&longs;t compare the Gravity of the Moveable with the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Medium again&longs;t Divi&longs;ion, becau&longs;e if the force of the Gravity exceed the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of the Medium, the Moveable will de&longs;cend, if not it will float. I need not make any other an&longs;wer, but that which hath been already delivered; namely, that its not the Re&longs;i&longs;tance of ab&longs;olute Divi&longs;ion, (which neither is in Water nor Air) but the Gravity of the Medium that mu&longs;t be compared with the Gravity of the Moveables; and if that of the Medium be greater, the Moveable &longs;hall not de&longs;cend, nor &longs;o much as make a totall Submer&longs;ion, but a partiall only: becau&longs;e in the place which it would occupy in the water, there mu&longs;t not remain a Body that weighs le&longs;s than a like quantity of water: but if the Moveable be more grave, it &longs;hall de&longs;­ cend to the bottom, and po&longs;&longs;e&longs;s a place where it is more conformable for it to remain, than another Body that is le&longs;s grave. And this is the only true proper and ab&longs;olute Cau&longs;e of Natation and Sub­ mer&longs;ion, &longs;o that nothing el&longs;e hath part therein: and the Board of the Adver&longs;aries &longs;wimmeth, when it is conjoyned with as much Air, as, together with it, doth form a Body le&longs;s grave than &longs;o much water as would fill the place that the &longs;aid Compound occupyes in the water; but when they &longs;hall demit the &longs;imple Ebony into the water, according to the Tenour of our Que­ &longs;tion, it &longs;hall alwayes go to the bottom, though it were as thin as a Paper.

Lib. 4. c. 6. Text 45.

FINIS.