ducantur rect&aelig; BI &amp; BD &longs;ecantes circulum CE in F &amp; E: <lb/>
Radium B excedunt exce&longs;&longs;ibus FI &amp; ED, qui ex 8. lib. 3. in&shy;<lb/>
&aelig;quales &longs;unt, &amp; ma&shy;<lb/>
<figure id="id.017.01.363.1.jpg" xlink:href="casat_mecha_017_la_1684/017-01-figures/017.01.363.1.jpg"/><lb/>
jor e&longs;t ED qu&agrave;m FI <lb/>
differenti&acirc; KD. </s> <s id="s.002647">Ar&shy;<lb/>
cuum &longs;ubten&longs;&aelig; CI <lb/>
&amp; ID &aelig;quales &longs;unt, <lb/>
&longs;inuum IH &amp; DG <lb/>
differentia e&longs;t LD. <!-- KEEP S--></s> <lb/>
<s id="s.002648">Dico majorem Ra&shy;<lb/>
tionem e&longs;&longs;e HI ad IF, qu&agrave;m LD ad DK. <!-- KEEP S--></s> </p>

<p type="main"> <s id="s.002649">Prim&ograve; ducantur rect&aelig; EF, KI: EF autem producatur ita, <lb/>
ut occurrat rect&aelig; DI product&aelig; in O. <!-- KEEP S--></s> <s id="s.002650">Quia triangula BFE &amp; <lb/>
BIK &longs;unt i&longs;o&longs;celia, &amp; angulus BEF &aelig;qualis e&longs;t angulo BKI, <lb/>
rect&aelig; EO &amp; KI ex 28.lib.1. &longs;unt parallel&aelig;: igitur ex 2 lib. 6. <lb/>
in triangulo DOE ut DI ad IO, ita DK ad KE: Atqui DI <lb/>
major e&longs;t qu&agrave;m IO, ergo etiam DK major qu&agrave;m KE. </s> <s id="s.002651">Proba&shy;<lb/>
tur autem DI majorem e&longs;&longs;e qu&agrave;m IO; quia DI &aelig;qualis e&longs;t <lb/>
ip&longs;i CI ex hypothe&longs;i; punctum ver&ograve; O e&longs;t extra circulum CE, <lb/>
quem linea EFO &longs;ecat: ergo linea EF producta occurrit li&shy;<lb/>
ne&aelig; IC citr&agrave; punctum C in S. <!-- KEEP S--></s> <s id="s.002652">Sed quoniam angulus BEF e&longs;t <lb/>
acutus, qui e&longs;t illi deinceps DEO e&longs;t obtu&longs;us; ergo per 16. <lb/>
lib.1. externus DOS multo magis e&longs;t obtu&longs;us: ergo per 19 <lb/>
lib.1. major e&longs;t IS qu&agrave;m IO, ergo mult&ograve; major e&longs;t IC qu&agrave;m <lb/>
IO, hoc e&longs;t ID major e&longs;t qu&agrave;m IO. <!-- KEEP S--></s> </p>

<p type="main"> <s id="s.002653">Deinde angulus MCI major e&longs;t angulo NID, majori enim <lb/>
arcui MDI ille in&longs;i&longs;tit, hic autem minori ND ex 33. lib. 6: <lb/>
triangula ver&ograve; HIC &amp; LDI rectangula &aelig;quales habent hy&shy;<lb/>
pothenu&longs;as, hoc e&longs;t Radios CI &amp; ID, ergo majoris anguli <lb/>
HCI major e&longs;t &longs;inus HI; minoris ver&ograve; anguli LID minor e&longs;t <lb/>
&longs;inus LD. <!-- KEEP S--></s> <s id="s.002654">Igitur ex 8. lib.5. HI major ad KE, hoc e&longs;t ad IF, <lb/>
habet majorem Rationem qu&agrave;m ad eandem KE habeat LD <lb/>
minor: &amp; eadem LD habet minorem Rationem ad DK ma&shy;<lb/>
jorem qu&agrave;m ad KE minorem: Ergo HI ad IF majorem habet <lb/>
Rationem, qu&agrave;m LD ad DK.