<p>The discovery indeed was owing rather to chance
than design; so that it is the good fortune of the discoverer,
rather than his skill or ability, we are indebted
to: on this account it concerns us the
less to know, who it was that first hit upon this
admirable invention. Be that as it may, it is certain
it must have been casual, since the theory it depends
upon was not then known.</p>
<p>John Baptista Porta, a Neapolitan, according to
Wolfius, first made a Telescope, which he infers from
this passage in the <hi rend="italics">Magia Naturalis</hi> of that author,
printed in 1560: “If you do but know how to join
“the two (viz, the concave and convex glasses) rightly
“together, you will see both remote and near objects,
“much larger than they otherwise appear, and withal
“very distinct. In this we have been of good help
“to many of our friends, who either saw remote
“things dimly, or near ones confusedly; and have
“made them see every thing perfectly.”</p>
<p>But it is certain, that Porta did not understand his
own invention, and therefore neither troubled himself
to bring it to a greater perfection, nor ever applied it
to celestial observation. Besides, the account given by
Porta of his concave and convex lenses, is so dark and
indistinct, that Kepler, who examined it by desire of
the emperor Rudolph, declared to that prince, that it
was perfectly unintelligible.</p>
<p>Thirty years afterwards, or in 1590, a Telescope
16 inches long was made, and presented to prince
Maurice of Nassau, by a spectacle maker of Middleburg:
but authors are divided about his name. Sirturus,
in a treatise on the Telescope, printed in 1618,
will have it to be John Lippersheim: and Borelli,
in a volume expressly on the inventor of the Telescope,
published in 1655, shews that it was Zacharias
Jansen, or, as Wolsius writes it, Hansen.</p>
<p>Now the invention of Lippersheim is fixed by some
in the year 1609, and by others in 1605: Fontana, in
his <hi rend="italics">Novæ Observationes Cælestium et Terrestrium Rerum,</hi>
printed at Naples in 1646, claims the invention in the
year 1608. But Borelli's account of the discovery of
Telescopes is so circumstantial, and so well authenticated,
as to render it very probable that Jansen was
the original inventor.</p>
<p>In 1620, James Metius of Alcmaer, brother of
Adrian Metius who was professor of mathematics at
Franeker, came with Drebel to Middleburg, and there
bought Telescopes of Jansen's children, who had made
them public; and yet this Adr. Metius has given his
brother the honour of the invention, in which too he
is mistakenly followed by Descartes.</p>
<p>But none of these artificers made Telescopes of
above a foot and a half: Simon Marius in Germany,
and Galileo in Italy, it is said, first made long ones fit
for celestial observations; though, from the recently
discovered astronomical papers of the celebrated Harriot,
author of the Algebra, it appears that he must
have made use of Telescopes in viewing the solar maculæ,
which he did quite as early as they were observed
by Galileo. Whether Harriot made his own
Telescopes, or whether he had them from Holland,
does not appear: it seems however that Galileo's were
made by himself; for Le Rossi relates, that Galileo,
being then at Venice, was told of a sort of optic glass
<cb/>
made in Holland, which brought objects nearer: upon
which, setting himself to think how it should be, he
ground two pieces of glass into form as well as he
could, and fitted them to the two ends of an organpipe;
and with these he shewed at once all the wonders
of the invention to the Venetians, on the top of
the tower of St. Mark. The same author adds, that
from this time Galileo devoted himself wholly to the
improving and perfecting the Telescope; and that he
hence almost deserved all the honour usually done him,
of being reputed the inventor of the instrument, and
of its being from him called <hi rend="italics">Galileo's tube.</hi> Galileo
himself, in his <hi rend="italics">Nuncius Sid<*>us,</hi> published in 1610,
acknowledges that he first heard of the instrument from
a German; and that, being merely informed of its
effects, first by common report, and a few days after
by letter from a French gentleman, James Badovere,
at Paris, he himself discovered the construction by considering
the nature of refraction. He adds in his <hi rend="italics">Saggiatore,</hi>
that he was at Venice when he heard of the
effects of prince Maurice's instrument, but nothing
of its construction; that the first night after his return
to Padua, he solved the problem, and made his instrument
the next day, and soon after presented it to the
Doge of Venice, who, in honour of his grand invention,
gave him the ducal letters, which settled him for
life in his lectureship, at Padua, and doubled his salary,
which then became treble of what any of his predecessors
had enjoyed before. And thus Galileo may be
considered as an inventor of the Telescope, though
not the first inventor.</p>
<p>F. Mabillon indeed relates, in his travels through
Italy, that in a monastery of his own order, he saw a
manuscript copy of the works of Commestor, written
by one Conradus, who lived in the 13th century; in
the 3d page of which was seen a portrait of Ptolomy,
viewing the stars through a tube of 4 joints or draws:
but that father does not say that the tube had glasses
in it. Indeed it is more than probable, that such tubes
were then used for no other purpose but to defend
and direct the sight, or to render it more distinct, by
singling out the particular object looked at, and shutting
out all the foreign rays reflected from others, whose
proximity might have rendered the image less precise.
And this conjecture is verified by experience; for we
have often observed that without a tube, by only looking
through the hand, or even the fingers, or a pinhole
in a paper, the objects appear more clear and
distinct than otherwise.</p>
<p>Be this as it may, it is certain that the optical principles,
upon which Telescopes are founded, are contained
in Euclid, and were well known to the ancient
geometricians; and it has been for want of attention to
them, that the world was so long without that admirable
invention; as doubtless there are many others
lying hid in the same principles, only waiting for reflection
or accident to bring them forth.</p>
<p>To the foregoing abstract of the history of the invention
of the Telescope, it may be proper to add some
particulars relating to the claims of our own celebrated
countryman, friar Bacon, who died in 1294. Mr.
W. Molyneux, in his Dioptrica Nova, pa. 256, declares
his opinion, that Bacon did perfectly well understand
all sorts of optic glasses, and knew likewise the